Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-26 Thread Momesso Andrea
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:14:38PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Wednesday 25 March 2009 16:54:21 Momesso Andrea wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:14:14PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:27:09 -0400, James Skinner wrote: Top-posting is totally fine when emailing from

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-25 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 03:40:51 Stroller wrote: Every time you bottom post with more than a page or screenful of quoting, a top-posting is justified. Every time you find you have a screenful of quoted text you should just trim out the extraneous crap and return the mail to sanity. As I

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-25 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:49:57 -0500, Dale wrote: I don't mind top posting in private emails but not on the list. Who is it with that signature with the backward questions about top posting? This one? A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-25 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:49:57 -0500, Dale wrote: I don't mind top posting in private emails but not on the list. Who is it with that signature with the backward questions about top posting? This one? A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-25 Thread James Skinner
Top-posting is totally fine when emailing from a mobile device. It does make it hard to follow a thread, but email's are time-stamped. On 3/25/09, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:49:57 -0500, Dale wrote: I don't mind top posting in private

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-25 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:27:09 -0400, James Skinner wrote: Top-posting is totally fine when emailing from a mobile device. It does make it hard to follow a thread, but email's are time-stamped. It doesn't mater what device is used to send the email, it is the recipient that is affected by the

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-25 Thread Momesso Andrea
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:14:14PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:27:09 -0400, James Skinner wrote: Top-posting is totally fine when emailing from a mobile device. It does make it hard to follow a thread, but email's are time-stamped. It doesn't mater what device is

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-25 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 16:54:21 Momesso Andrea wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:14:14PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:27:09 -0400, James Skinner wrote: Top-posting is totally fine when emailing from a mobile device. It does make it hard to follow a thread, but

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-25 Thread Paul Hartman
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday 25 March 2009 16:54:21 Momesso Andrea wrote: Unfortunatly my BlackBerry doesn't allow bottom posting. I hope you guys forgive me for the few times I answer on this list using my mobile device. What?

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-25 Thread Paul Hartman
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday 25 March 2009 16:54:21 Momesso Andrea wrote: Unfortunatly my BlackBerry doesn't allow bottom posting. I hope you guys

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-25 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 17:16:51 Paul Hartman wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday 25 March 2009 16:54:21 Momesso Andrea wrote: Unfortunatly my BlackBerry doesn't allow bottom posting. I hope you guys forgive me for the few

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on? - snippage

2009-03-25 Thread Stroller
On 25 Mar 2009, at 07:06, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Wednesday 25 March 2009 03:40:51 Stroller wrote: Every time you bottom post with more than a page or screenful of quoting, a top-posting is justified. Every time you find you have a screenful of quoted text you should just trim out the

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on? - snippage

2009-03-25 Thread AllenJB
Can you ALL please take this off-topic conversation off list. This is a general support list used by many users of a wide range of experience, therefore you can not expect to be able to enforce any standards, either way. In addition, please keep language clean on this list. AllenJB

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-25 Thread Graham Murray
Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com writes: There are many devices and webmail services that do quoting in the Microsoft Outlook style -- putting a one-line divider between the reply and the original message. No indentation or nesting of replies. This makes it harder to reply to

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on? - snippage

2009-03-25 Thread Roy Wright
AllenJB wrote: Can you ALL please take this off-topic conversation off list. +1 In addition, please keep language clean on this list. +1 Well said.

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-25 Thread Dale
Graham Murray wrote: Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com writes: There are many devices and webmail services that do quoting in the Microsoft Outlook style -- putting a one-line divider between the reply and the original message. No indentation or nesting of replies. This makes it

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-24 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:46:15 -0400, James Skinner wrote: Man. Is this thread really going to continue?? As long as people have something to say, yes. Now it can be forked into a no-top-posting discussion too, so you have helped prolong it that much longer :) -- Neil Bothwick If you're not

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on? - top posting

2009-03-24 Thread KH
Dale schrieb: James Skinner wrote: Man. Is this thread really going to continue?? If you are not careful, you will get someone on the no top posting soapbox. LOL This is a educational channel and there are teachers and learners. I'm the learner. We can however change the

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-24 Thread Stroller
On 24 Mar 2009, at 02:34, Albert Hopkins wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 18:58 -0500, Dale wrote: Albert Hopkins wrote: On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 22:18 -0500, Dale wrote: Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:26:40 -0500, Dale wrote: emerge -pvDu --reinstall changed-use @world ???

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-24 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:40:51 +, Stroller wrote: Every time you bottom post with more than a page or screenful of quoting, a top-posting is justified. No it's not, but trimming of the quoted text is. -- Neil Bothwick There are 10 types of people in this world, those who understand

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-24 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:40:51 +, Stroller wrote: Every time you bottom post with more than a page or screenful of quoting, a top-posting is justified. No it's not, but trimming of the quoted text is. +1 I don't mind top posting in private emails

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-23 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:18:09 -0500, Dale wrote: I'm not real familiar with aliases but know what it is. If you use the alias method, how would you disable it for a one time run? If you gave the alias the same name as the command, just use the full path to the command to call it directly. But

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-23 Thread Dale
Albert Hopkins wrote: On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 22:18 -0500, Dale wrote: Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:26:40 -0500, Dale wrote: emerge -pvDu --reinstall changed-use @world ??? Certainly a lot more typing. ;-) Use an alias

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-23 Thread Hilco Wijbenga
2009/3/23 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com: Oh, OK.  Dale waves hand over head.  If it is set up to add that option, how do you tell it not to use it? alias ls='/bin/ls --color' alias l='ls -l' With these aliases in your .bashrc (or whatever is appropriate in your environment), you can now use 'ls'

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-23 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 18:58 -0500, Dale wrote: Albert Hopkins wrote: On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 22:18 -0500, Dale wrote: Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:26:40 -0500, Dale wrote: emerge -pvDu --reinstall changed-use @world ??? Certainly a lot more

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-23 Thread James Skinner
Man. Is this thread really going to continue?? On 3/23/09, Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 18:58 -0500, Dale wrote: Albert Hopkins wrote: On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 22:18 -0500, Dale wrote: Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:26:40 -0500, Dale

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-23 Thread Dale
Hilco Wijbenga wrote: 2009/3/23 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com: Oh, OK. Dale waves hand over head. If it is set up to add that option, how do you tell it not to use it? alias ls='/bin/ls --color' alias l='ls -l' With these aliases in your .bashrc (or whatever is appropriate in your

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Dale
Mike Diehl wrote: On Saturday 21 March 2009 21:00:11 Dale wrote: Mike Kazantsev wrote: On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:17:53 -0600 Mike Diehl mdi...@diehlnet.com wrote: Has Gentoo become such a moving target that it's no longer suitable for normal, every day, usage? If

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Philip Webb
090321 Mike Diehl wrote: Ok now, I'm getting fed up with all of the breakage that I've seen in Gentoo in the last few months. I haven't experienced any such thing. I'm trying to upgrade MythTV. I don't use that, so can't help directly. Emerge told me to upgrade my profile, which I did.

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:58:57 -0400, Philip Webb wrote: Now I'm doing an emerge -u world. I never do that: I always do 'emerge -Dup world', then decide which packages to update emerge them individually. I hope you use --oneshot every time or your world file will be a complete mess by now

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sunday 22 March 2009 07:50:04 Mike Diehl wrote: So here is the question: Are these just growing pains, or is this the trend with Gentoo? If I resolve to update frequently, will these problems become more rare? I've been using Gentoo for 4 years now, my main desktop is still running code

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:50:04 -0600, Mike Diehl wrote: However, lately, Gentoo seems to have been plagued with problems. Circular blockers. 32/64 bit libraries. Package re-organization. Others. That's inevitable with a versionless distro like Gentoo. With the other distros you have mentions,

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread KH
Hi, you also have the chance of running emerge -DuavN system. That way you can be sure that your system is stable without updating every program you might only need once in a blue moon or you are allready seticfied with. I would allways have an eye on the GLSA. You can do this in the forum, with

emerge-log (was: Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?)

2009-03-22 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Philip Webb schrieb am 22.03.2009 07:58: I never do that: I always do 'emerge -Dup world', then decide which packages to update emerge them individually. I also have a list of all the pkgs I have installed with dates + deps, which I keep upto-date by hand as I emerge items. I've never

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Philip Webb
090322 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:58:57 -0400, Philip Webb wrote: Now I'm doing an emerge -u world. I never do that: I always do 'emerge -Dup world', then decide which packages to update emerge them individually. I hope you use --oneshot every time or your world file will

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Peter Alfredsen
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:17:53 -0600 Mike Diehl mdi...@diehlnet.com wrote: It seems that as long as I keep rebuilding machines from a current live CD, all is well. But if I try to upgrade anything else, I end up having to reformat. I've been using Gentoo long enough to have actually met

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 07:37:50 -0400, Philip Webb wrote: 090322 Neil Bothwick wrote: I hope you use --oneshot every time or your world file will be a complete mess by now :( Yes, there's always someone who says that (grin). I wouldn't want to disappoint you :) Of course, it's 2nd nature

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Sonntag, 22. März 2009 02:17:53 schrieb Mike Diehl: Ok now, I'm getting fed up with all of the breakage that I've seen in Gentoo in the last few months. I'm trying to upgrade MythTV. Emerge told me to upgrade my profile, which I did. Now I'm doing an emerge -u world. But before I

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 12:44 +0100, Peter Alfredsen wrote: I would say that if you do a complete world update at least every six months, followed by revdep-rebuild, keeping Gentoo up-to-date should be relatively painless, excluding all the blockers you have to resolve. ie.: emerge -uDNav

RE: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread James Homuth
-Original Message- From: Philip Webb [mailto:purs...@ca.inter.net] Sent: March 22, 2009 7:38 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on? 090322 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:58:57 -0400, Philip Webb wrote: Now I'm doing an emerge -u

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Dale
Philip Webb wrote: 090322 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:58:57 -0400, Philip Webb wrote: Now I'm doing an emerge -u world. I never do that: I always do 'emerge -Dup world', then decide which packages to update emerge them individually. I hope you

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Dale
Philip Webb wrote: 090322 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:58:57 -0400, Philip Webb wrote: Now I'm doing an emerge -u world. I never do that: I always do 'emerge -Dup world', then decide which packages to update emerge them individually. I hope you

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Mark Knecht
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Mike Diehl mdi...@diehlnet.com wrote: Ok now, I'm getting fed up with all of the breakage that I've seen in Gentoo in the last few months. Understood and personally felt. SNIP emerge -C mktemp Generally a *very* bad move unless you are *absolutely* sure

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:23:38 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: 2) emerge -DuN world building lots of packages that are already on the system but the LoG has apparently changed flags so emerge wants to rebuild them. Don't use --newuse, use --reinstall changed-use. -- Neil Bothwick Most software is

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 13:23 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: Personally I think we're in one of those unfortunate periods of time where there is a relatively high number of issues. I'm seeing it on all my machines. It's taking far more of my time to deal with this than I wish it would. 1)

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Mark Knecht
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:23:38 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: 2) emerge -DuN world building lots of packages that are already on the system but the LoG has apparently changed flags so emerge wants to rebuild them. Don't use

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Mark Knecht
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org wrote: On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 13:23 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: Personally I think we're in one of those unfortunate periods of time where there is a relatively high number of issues. I'm seeing it on all my machines. It's

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Stroller
On 22 Mar 2009, at 22:07, Mark Knecht wrote: ... 1) ntp-update problems at boot time. Hmm, I'm not having any ntp-update problems on my machines. Have you submitted a bug report or searched the bug database? Obviously this isn't happening for everyone so if the right people don't know

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:02:12 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: Also, it seems that there's no shortcut for that command so instead of emerge -pvDuN @world if I understand then I might try emerge -pvDu --reinstall changed-use @world ??? Certainly a lot more typing.

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:26:40 -0500, Dale wrote: emerge -pvDu --reinstall changed-use @world ??? Certainly a lot more typing. ;-) Use an alias and it's less typing. Or add it to make.conf. I think that would work too. It would work, every time you called emerge, whether you wanted

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:26:40 -0500, Dale wrote: emerge -pvDu --reinstall changed-use @world ??? Certainly a lot more typing. ;-) Use an alias and it's less typing. Or add it to make.conf. I think that would work too. It would

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-22 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 22:18 -0500, Dale wrote: Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:26:40 -0500, Dale wrote: emerge -pvDu --reinstall changed-use @world ??? Certainly a lot more typing. ;-) Use an alias and it's less typing. Or add it to

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-21 Thread Mike Kazantsev
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:17:53 -0600 Mike Diehl mdi...@diehlnet.com wrote: Has Gentoo become such a moving target that it's no longer suitable for normal, every day, usage? If you're prepared to update you system at least once a week and have up-to-date knowledge of all the installed stuff, so

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-21 Thread Dale
Mike Kazantsev wrote: On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:17:53 -0600 Mike Diehl mdi...@diehlnet.com wrote: Has Gentoo become such a moving target that it's no longer suitable for normal, every day, usage? If you're prepared to update you system at least once a week and have up-to-date

Re: [gentoo-user] Time to move on?

2009-03-21 Thread Mike Diehl
On Saturday 21 March 2009 21:00:11 Dale wrote: Mike Kazantsev wrote: On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:17:53 -0600 Mike Diehl mdi...@diehlnet.com wrote: Has Gentoo become such a moving target that it's no longer suitable for normal, every day, usage? If you're prepared to update you system at