On 1 Aug 2009, at 04:56, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I've got portage's dev-perl/XML-Parser-2.36, but nevertheless several
packages have started to fail during emerge for lack of Perl's
XML::Parser.
Even the simple script fails to run under perl:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use XML::Parser;
print yes\n;
John Blinka schrieb:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Stefan G. Weichingerli...@xunil.at wrote:
Didn't the binary-paths change with 2.6 ?
Yes.
Check if /usr/libexec/amanda/amandad exists and adjust the xinetd-entry
if necessary.
Did that. The binaries exist and xinetd entries point
I'm not exactly sure what I've done to fix things, but backups and
amrecovers are now working properly.
For the record, on the backup server, the /etc/xinetd.d/amanda file contains:
service amanda
{
socket_type = dgram
protocol= udp
wait= yes
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 13:10:41 -0400
Simon turne...@gmail.com wrote:
I have tried using git in the past and found that it doesnt work in my
'space constrained' scenario. The need for a repository is a problem.
The use of the usbkey however is nice since it allows git to work
without having
Vagner Rodrigues vagner at litrixlinux.org writes:
I work with another admin's and I never told me when they access and
for what my server to do something, I try log but this can be erased
and maybe mail can help me about access and with this I can Ask about
this access.
Well, what
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:51 PM, ABCDen.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I've got portage's dev-perl/XML-Parser-2.36, but nevertheless several
packages have started to fail during emerge for lack of Perl's
XML::Parser.
Even the simple script fails to run under perl:
On 1 Aug 2009, at 14:54, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
...
It has always baffled me, given this sensitivity, that all such
packages don't just declare that they use the 'ithreads' USE flag,
even if they don't explicitly. Then my usual emerge --newuse would do
the Right Thing (TM).
The build scripts
Hi,
For some reason, YouTube doesn't work for me in some web browsers. It
acts like the hostname is not found. When I do host www.youtube.com
lookups and tcptraceroute to port 80 and everything else I have tried
to diagnose it seems to work just fine. I'm not using a proxy, I don't
have youtube
On Saturday 01 August 2009 16:53:08 Paul Hartman wrote:
Hi,
For some reason, YouTube doesn't work for me in some web browsers. It
acts like the hostname is not found. When I do host www.youtube.com
lookups and tcptraceroute to port 80 and everything else I have tried
to diagnose it seems to
On Saturday 01 August 2009 15:35:35 James wrote:
That way you can document what other admins have done,
with a variety of techniques and when servers are migrated to another
admin, the new admin can document how things work or have been set up,
to the point of training another admin. Often,
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Alan McKinnonalan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 01 August 2009 16:53:08 Paul Hartman wrote:
Hi,
For some reason, YouTube doesn't work for me in some web browsers. It
acts like the hostname is not found. When I do host www.youtube.com
lookups and
Paul Hartman wrote:
My ISP's DNS servers have 3 strikes against them:
1. It is slow, slow, slow, slow, slow... and did I mention slow? :)
2. They have previously sold user's DNS/browsing history to
advertisers. They claim to have stopped, but...
3. They hijack DNS, making every invalid
On Saturday 01 August 2009, Paul Hartman wrote:
My ISP's DNS servers have 3 strikes against them:
1. It is slow, slow, slow, slow, slow... and did I mention slow? :)
2. They have previously sold user's DNS/browsing history to
advertisers. They claim to have stopped, but...
3. They hijack
On Saturday 01 August 2009 18:56:24 Paul Hartman wrote:
Following that thought -- I wonder if there is a special YouTube
server for my ISP and the standard/outside YouTube server farm is
blocked? I've read about Google hosting servers at or near major ISPs
to reduce the number of hops, but
On Saturday 01 August 2009 19:03:49 Remy Blank wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
My ISP's DNS servers have 3 strikes against them:
1. It is slow, slow, slow, slow, slow... and did I mention slow? :)
2. They have previously sold user's DNS/browsing history to
advertisers. They claim to have
On 8/1/09, Remy Blank remy.bl...@pobox.com wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
My ISP's DNS servers have 3 strikes against them:
1. It is slow, slow, slow, slow, slow... and did I mention slow? :)
2. They have previously sold user's DNS/browsing history to
advertisers. They claim to have stopped,
Paul Hartman wrote:
My ISP's DNS servers have 3 strikes against them:
1. It is slow, slow, slow, slow, slow... and did I mention slow? :)
2. They have previously sold user's DNS/browsing history to
advertisers. They claim to have stopped, but...
3. They hijack DNS, making every invalid
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Remy Blankremy.bl...@pobox.com wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
My ISP's DNS servers have 3 strikes against them:
1. It is slow, slow, slow, slow, slow... and did I mention slow? :)
2. They have previously sold user's DNS/browsing history to
advertisers. They claim
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
My ISP's DNS servers have 3 strikes against them:
1. It is slow, slow, slow, slow, slow... and did I mention slow? :)
2. They have previously sold user's DNS/browsing history to
advertisers. They claim to
Starting on July 26, my email client started displaying a number
of messages lacking subject lines. The messages were all cronjob
outputs.
Here's a sample:
From rel...@osage.osagesoftware.com Mon Jul 27 00:15:02 2009
Return-Path: rel...@osage.osagesoftware.com
X-Original-To:
I've been trying to get a few recalcitrant packages to build
(evolution-data-server, openoffice) but they seem to require things
that my system does not have, and portage doesn't know this.
So I'm trying revdep-rebuild, which also fails. In particular,
x11-libs/gtkglext-1.2.0 won't build because
On Saturday 01 August 2009 23:19:52 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I've been trying to get a few recalcitrant packages to build
(evolution-data-server, openoffice) but they seem to require things
that my system does not have, and portage doesn't know this.
So I'm trying revdep-rebuild, which also
Hi. On my latest update attempt, I get the following message: !!! All
ebuilds that could satisfy =sys-fs/udev-145[extras] have been
masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
request:
- sys-fs/udev- (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword)
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Alan McKinnonalan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 01 August 2009 23:19:52 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I've been trying to get a few recalcitrant packages to build
(evolution-data-server, openoffice) but they seem to require things
that my system does not have,
I was updating my wife's machine today and noticed that there are a
number of older/stranded gcc-config's left on the machine. I still
have gcc-4.1.2 but the other 3.3/3.4 versions should not remain.
How would I remove these?
Thanks,
Mark
dragonfly ~ # gcc-config -l
[1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.3
Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon at gmail.com writes:
See where this is going?
No documentation = no knowledge transfer = no wage increase.
Well, these days, I work in smaller circles, but, I like your
ideas. I pretty much do the same thing with consultants,
contracts and money
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:19:52 -0700
Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Are the packages looking for a .la file? I had a problem on my system
that it wanted a nonexistant opengl.la or something similar. I ended up
fixing it by emerging dev-util/lafilefixer and running it
over
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 04:41:51PM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
I was updating my wife's machine today and noticed that there are a
number of older/stranded gcc-config's left on the machine. I still
have gcc-4.1.2 but the other 3.3/3.4 versions should not remain.
How would I remove these?
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Kenneth Prughken69...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:19:52 -0700
Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Are the packages looking for a .la file? I had a problem on my system
that it wanted a nonexistant opengl.la or something similar. I ended
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Kevin O'Gormankogor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Kenneth Prughken69...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:19:52 -0700
Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Are the packages looking for a .la file? I had a problem on my
I don't want to get into a flamewar over this, but I'm working on
Fortran 77 program for a personal project. Because the gcc maintainers
gave up on F77, and f95 is partial superset that deprecates some F77
stuff, I'm trying to do this with the DJGPP g77 compiler under DOS
emulation. g77 dies
31 matches
Mail list logo
