Apparently, though unproven, at 05:03 on Friday 06 May 2011, Kfir Lavi did
opine thusly:
Hi,
emerge -vpt -e system
...
[nomerge ] sys-apps/shadow-4.1.4.3 USE=cracklib nls pam -audit
(-selinux) -skey
You used --tree
That line is probably part of some other packages dep graph. Look
Hi,
I'm trying to update my old rig, the x86 one. It is about 2 months or
so behind. I wanted to get it ready for the latest KDE for my brother
to play on. I keep running into this type of error:
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to disable maintainer-specific
This is usually CFLAGS and other bits of env stuff. There's probably a more
meaningful error earlier in the build log.
Can you post the full log for a failing file?
Apparently, though unproven, at 09:45 on Friday 06 May 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
Hi,
I'm trying to update my old rig,
Alan McKinnon wrote:
This is usually CFLAGS and other bits of env stuff. There's probably a more
meaningful error earlier in the build log.
Can you post the full log for a failing file?
Here is one:
Emerging (1 of 5) x11-libs/gdk-pixbuf-2.22.1
* gdk-pixbuf-2.22.1.tar.bz2 RMD160 SHA1
On 05/06/2011 11:28 AM, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
This is usually CFLAGS and other bits of env stuff. There's probably a
more
meaningful error earlier in the build log.
Can you post the full log for a failing file?
Here is one:
No, that's not it. It's this:
!!! Please attach the
/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.4/temp/logging
PORTAGE_LOG_FILE=/var/log/portage/elog/sys-apps:sandbox-2.4:20110506-073007.log
SANDBOX_VERBOSE=1
PORTAGE_COMPRESS_EXCLUDE_SUFFIXES=css gif htm[l]? jp[e]?g js pdf png
LOGNAME=root
LESS=-R -M --shift 5
TMP=/var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.4/temp
WINDOW
On 06/05/11 11:08, Dale wrote:
That shed any light?
Dale
:-) :-)
Yes it does
/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.4/cc1: error while loading shared
libraries: libmpfr.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
you upgraded your mpfr. Now you have to
On 05/06/2011 12:08 PM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
No, that's not it. It's this:
!!! Please attach the following file when seeking support:
!!! /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.4/work/build-default/config.log
Hmmm. Thought it was the same. Here goes but it is lengthy:
[...]
justin wrote:
On 06/05/11 11:08, Dale wrote:
That shed any light?
Dale
:-) :-)
Yes it does
/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.4/cc1: error while loading shared
libraries: libmpfr.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
you upgraded your mpfr. Now
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:15 on Friday 06 May 2011, justin did opine
thusly:
On 06/05/11 11:08, Dale wrote:
That shed any light?
Dale
:-) :-)
Yes it does
/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.4/cc1: error while loading shared
libraries: libmpfr.so.1: cannot open
Hi,
My system is Gentoo 64bit, up to date. I want to use GAE, but it
supports python2.5 only. So I emerged python2.5, but I am unable to
emerge packages for python2.5.
E.g. I emerged dev-python/oauth, but it is installed to
/usr/lib64/python2.7, but not python2.5.
I think using eselect to
Dale wrote:
justin wrote:
On 06/05/11 11:08, Dale wrote:
That shed any light?
Dale
:-) :-)
Yes it does
/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.4/cc1: error while loading shared
libraries: libmpfr.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
you upgraded your mpfr.
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 05/06/2011 12:08 PM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
No, that's not it. It's this:
!!! Please attach the following file when seeking support:
!!! /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.4/work/build-default/config.log
Hmmm. Thought it was the same. Here goes
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:15 on Friday 06 May 2011, justin did opine
thusly:
On 06/05/11 11:08, Dale wrote:
That shed any light?
Dale
:-) :-)
Yes it does
/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.4/cc1: error while loading shared
libraries:
On 06.05.2011 13:28, Xi Shen wrote:
Hi,
My system is Gentoo 64bit, up to date. I want to use GAE, but it
supports python2.5 only. So I emerged python2.5, but I am unable to
emerge packages for python2.5.
E.g. I emerged dev-python/oauth, but it is installed to
/usr/lib64/python2.7, but not
On 5/5/2011, at 10:53pm, Mick wrote:
...
Portage should run lafilefixer on its own these days. The fixlafiles is one
of the default FEATURES.
I only read of that on this list in the last few weeks, so had assumed it had
come of ~x86, but not yet x86.
Stroller.
yes, USE_PYTHON. thank you!
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Evgeny Bushkov z...@dotcomltd.ru wrote:
On 06.05.2011 13:28, Xi Shen wrote:
Hi,
My system is Gentoo 64bit, up to date. I want to use GAE, but it
supports python2.5 only. So I emerged python2.5, but I am unable to
emerge packages
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 12:18 +0200, Andrea Conti wrote:
AFAIK in order to avoid this kind of
breakage system ebuilds such as mpfr never delete old library
versions;
they just print a warning saying that the old library has been kept
around and should be manually deleted after running
/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.4/cc1: error while loading shared
libraries: libmpfr.so.1: cannot open shared object file
Meaning, run revdep-rebuild :)
Yeah, right. So revdep-rebuild does its thing, finds out that gcc is
broken and tries to rebuild it with the broken gcc :)
In this
Hi,
My system is Gentoo 64bit, up to date. I want to use Nginx+FastCgi+PHP
to build my web site. But I found if I start the php-cgi, through the
spawn-fcgi tool, as nginx:nginx, I got No input file specified.
message on in my browser. If I spawn the process as root:root,
everything works fine.
The access permission to
/usr/lib64/php5.3/bin/php-cgi is 755, so I think everyone can execute
it. Then, what is the problem?
Most probably, the nginx user cannot access the .php file you're trying
to execute, either because of its permissions or because it cannot
traverse one of its parent
On Fri, 6 May 2011 11:03:47 +0100, Stroller wrote:
Portage should run lafilefixer on its own these days. The fixlafiles
is one of the default FEATURES.
Portage has its own code for this, lafilefixer can be uninstalled.
I only read of that on this list in the last few weeks, so had
Hi, Alan.
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 11:06:52PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:22 on Sunday 01 May 2011, Alan Mackenzie
did opine thusly:
Hi, Gentoo.
Could somebody please help me with a printing problem.
With a piece of sheet music downloaded from
On 05/06/2011 11:52 AM, Evgeny Bushkov wrote:
Try to add USE_PYTHON=2.5 2.7 to your make.conf. After that rebuild
your package.
.. using app-admin/python-updater !
Sebastian
On 2011-05-05, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011-05-05, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
It finished emerging, and everything works exactly as expected. The
new templates (and old ones) all show up inside the program
automatically, no problems at all. The
On 05/06/2011 12:45 AM, Dale wrote:
checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler works... no
I know you have it fixed now, but just thought I'd mention that
you will see the same error when compiling something in a directory
where you don't have write privileges.
Hello,
thank you for your reply,
I check that I didn't mixed QT version,
first I tried with 4.7.2, than I unmerged all qt packages and I tried
4.7.3 .
every time after emerging I checked system consistency with revdep-rebuild.
Now I unmerged all, emerged all QT packages (4.72) with debug
I successfuly installed lafilefixer and then ran it, however, the problem
persists :(
2011/5/5 Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk
On 5/5/2011, at 3:00am, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
...
The thing is that emerging mirrorselect has the following outcome:
* QA Notice: libdialog.la appears
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Lorenzo Marussi i...@lorenzomarussi.it wrote:
Hello,
thank you for your reply,
I check that I didn't mixed QT version,
first I tried with 4.7.2, than I unmerged all qt packages and I tried 4.7.3
.
every time after emerging I checked system consistency with
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 12:32:50PM -0300, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
I successfuly installed lafilefixer and then ran it, however, the problem
persists :(
2011/5/5 Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk
On 5/5/2011, at 3:00am, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
...
The thing is that
2011/5/6 Kevin McCarthy sign...@gentoo.org
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 12:32:50PM -0300, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
I successfuly installed lafilefixer and then ran it, however, the problem
persists :(
2011/5/5 Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk
On 5/5/2011, at 3:00am, Rafael
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Andrea Conti a...@alyf.net wrote:
The access permission to
/usr/lib64/php5.3/bin/php-cgi is 755, so I think everyone can execute
it. Then, what is the problem?
Most probably, the nginx user cannot access the .php file you're trying
to execute, either
Doesn't look like this went through the first time; re-sending without
attachment.
On May 5, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:40 PM, John Nielsen li...@jnielsen.net wrote:
I am trying to set up a 5GHz wireless access point on an Alix 3d2 board with
an AR9220
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 01:45:01PM -0300, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
Attached to this message are the contents of the afforementioned file,
thanks for the help!!!
Hmm... It looks like libtool is being called to link the library when
DESTDIR is set. It shouldn't be set during the compile phase,
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 03:25:31PM -0300, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
2011/5/6 Kevin McCarthy sign...@gentoo.org
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 01:45:01PM -0300, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
Attached to this message are the contents of the afforementioned file,
thanks for the help!!!
This seems
On Friday 06 May 2011 18:04:31 John Nielsen wrote:
Doesn't look like this went through the first time; re-sending without
attachment.
On May 5, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:40 PM, John Nielsen li...@jnielsen.net wrote:
I am trying to set up a 5GHz
On Fri, 6 May 2011 12:34:29 -0400, Kevin McCarthy wrote:
[application/pgp-signature (490 bytes)]
Kevin, can you upload your PGP/GPG key to a public keyserver, otherwise
the only point of signing your mails is to cause mailers to slow down
while trying to check a signature against an
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Kevin McCarthy sign...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 03:25:31PM -0300, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
2011/5/6 Kevin McCarthy sign...@gentoo.org
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 01:45:01PM -0300, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
Attached to this message are the
On Friday 06 May 2011 19:57:36 Kevin McCarthy wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 03:25:31PM -0300, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
2011/5/6 Kevin McCarthy sign...@gentoo.org
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 01:45:01PM -0300, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
Attached to this message are the contents of the
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 10:45:31PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Kevin, can you upload your PGP/GPG key to a public keyserver, otherwise
the only point of signing your mails is to cause mailers to slow down
while trying to check a signature against an unavailable key.
I know what you mean. I
Dale wrote:
On the list of things to do. Running python-updater now will run that
next.
Thanks.
Dale
:-) :-)
Well, this ain't good. Neither python-updater nor revdep-rebuild can
complete. Either it is a missing package or some other error. Am I to
the point where I have to
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 12:18 +0200, Andrea Conti wrote:
AFAIK in order to avoid this kind of
breakage system ebuilds such as mpfr never delete old library
versions;
they just print a warning saying that the old library has been kept
around and should be manually
Dale writes:
Dale wrote:
On the list of things to do. Running python-updater now will run that
next.
Well, this ain't good. Neither python-updater nor revdep-rebuild can
complete. Either it is a missing package or some other error. Am I to
the point where I have to reinstall?
Add
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
Dale wrote:
On the list of things to do. Running python-updater now will run that
next.
Well, this ain't good. Neither python-updater nor revdep-rebuild can
complete. Either it is a missing package or some other error. Am I to
the
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 11:50:02PM +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2011 12:34:29 -0400, Kevin McCarthy wrote:
[application/pgp-signature (490 bytes)]
Kevin, can you upload your PGP/GPG key to a public keyserver, otherwise
the only point of signing your mails is to cause mailers
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 02:10:01AM +0200, Indi wrote:
Speaking of that, I always get that notice the PGP signature could
not be verified on your mails, Neil.
Never mind, sorry -- that was my configuration needed updating.
--
caveat utilitor
On 2011-05-06, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
P. S. One would think a Gentoo system could sit idle for a couple
months without this sort of mess.
It depends on which couple of months you happen to pick. ;)
Most of the time a couple months is OK. Once in a while there will
be several
47 matches
Mail list logo
