When using R on my Gentoo machine, whether in interactive or in batch
mode, calling `help()' causes the following error:
Error in strsplit(txt, \n, fixed = TRUE) :
'split' string 1 is invalid UTF-8
When in interactive mode, typing any function with an opening bracket
(eg. `help(') and
With net-misc/wget-1.13.3-r2, when executing `wget --version', I get
GNU Wget 1.13.3 built on linux-gnu.\n\n+digest
(intepret as C string, you migh need to note that there is no newline in
the end of the output); when executing `wget --help', I get
GNU Wget 1.13.3, a non-interactive
What would cause this?
bunyip rpm # /opt/vmware/lib/vmware/bin/vmware
*** glibc detected *** /opt/vmware/lib/vmware/bin/vmware: malloc():
memory corruption: 0x09f35e80 ***
^C
bunyip rpm #
Ive tried doing a emerge -ep world
glibc is
* sys-libs/glibc
Latest version available: 2.12.2
Neil Bothwick writes:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 19:04:17 -0400, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Putting it on a logical volume is one advantage, allowing /usr to be
resized should the need arise.
Why not allow / to be resized entirely? You probably will take the
machine off-line anyway.
Because
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 05:15, kashani kashani-l...@badapple.net wrote:
On 9/7/2011 5:25 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
Well, for all my other servers, I standardized on ext4.
Since a vFirewall have to perform lots of packet-juggling, I'd rather
dedicate the CPU time to the kernel rather than the HD
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 23:30:16 -0400, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Because you can't boot from an LV, so you'd than need a separate /boot
and an initramfs. Without LVM, you are unlikely to be able to resize /
or /usr as it is not usually the last partition on the drive.
So, you guys want a
Am Mittwoch, 7. September 2011, 23:33:35 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
The more I think about this merge of / and /usr, the dumber I think the
idea is. As I wrote in an earlier message on this list, the initramfs
will be many times larger than the kernel itself. Indeed, my /boot
partition
Alberto Luaces writes:
Neil Bothwick writes:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 19:04:17 -0400, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Putting it on a logical volume is one advantage, allowing /usr to be
resized should the need arise.
Why not allow / to be resized entirely? You probably will take the
machine
Hello!
I've installed vmware-player, but can't start it. It outputs a lot of
messages (none of them seems to be error msgs) and gives back the prompt:
localhost ~ # vmplayer
Logging to /tmp/vmware-root/setup-8401.log
filename: /lib/modules/2.6.38-gentoo-r6/misc/vmmon.ko
supported:
On 09/08/2011 10:10 AM, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
What would cause this?
bunyip rpm # /opt/vmware/lib/vmware/bin/vmware
*** glibc detected *** /opt/vmware/lib/vmware/bin/vmware: malloc():
memory corruption: 0x09f35e80 ***
^C
bunyip rpm #
Ive tried doing a emerge -ep world
glibc is
*
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 19:08:21 -0400
David Relson rel...@osagesoftware.com wrote:
G'day,
I'm having a problem with VirtualBox and am looking for ideas.
As background, I'm running virtualbox-bin-4.1.2 on a 2.6.39-gentoo-r2
kernel on an AMD Phenom 9850. My vmware install no longer works
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 23:23:45 -0400
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
I wound up being able to recover by doing a full reinstall of all
packages on the live system after mounting /usr into a
freshly-mkfs'd new lvm volume. If I'd taken the system offline, it
would have been much
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.ilwrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011, Kfir Lavi wrote about Nested VMX support in qemu and
kvm:
Hi,
Wow, I didn't expect to see a discussion about nested VMX in linux-il?
Any particular reason why you bring this up here, and not
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:45 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
from here I learned the altgr-intl keyboard layout:
http://dry.sailingissues.com/us-international-keyboard-layout.html
which I will try. It seems to be a good choice for daily
programming and writing (I need german Umlauts...;)
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Then don't update. Wanna keep up with upstream? Then accept that sometimes
you will need to change your setup, and change how you do stuff. Regards.
This is so like something I have told folks about
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 23:30:16 -0400, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Because you can't boot from an LV, so you'd than need a separate /boot
and an initramfs. Without LVM, you are unlikely to be able to resize /
or /usr as it
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 7. September 2011, 23:33:35 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
The more I think about this merge of / and /usr, the dumber I think the
idea is. As I wrote in an earlier message on this list, the initramfs
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Then don't update. Wanna keep up with upstream? Then accept that sometimes
you will need to change your setup, and change
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 23:23:45 -0400
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
I wound up being able to recover by doing a full reinstall of all
packages on the live system after mounting /usr into a
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Then don't update. Wanna keep up with upstream? Then
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:15:40 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
Perhaps udev's problem is that it's too complex, as a result of having
too large a problem scope.
The problem, AIUI, is the udev can run any programs specified in the
rules files, and they may not be available before /usr is mounted. If the
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 11:13:58 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 7. September 2011, 23:33:35 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
I don't see any problem with an initramfs larger than the kernel. It
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 16:58:22 schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:15:40 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
Perhaps udev's problem is that it's too complex, as a result of having
too large a problem scope.
The problem, AIUI, is the udev can run any programs specified in the
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 11:13:58 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 7. September 2011, 23:33:35 schrieb Canek Peláez
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 23:33:35 -0400, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] /dev/sda* missing at boot:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:37 PM, David W Noon dwn...@ntlworld.com
wrote:
[snip]
The more I think about this merge of / and /usr, the dumber I think
the idea is. As I wrote in an
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 16:58:22 schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:15:40 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
Perhaps udev's problem is that it's too complex, as a result of having
too large a problem
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:44 PM, David W Noon dwn...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 23:33:35 -0400, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] /dev/sda* missing at boot:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:37 PM, David W Noon dwn...@ntlworld.com
wrote:
[snip]
The more I think about
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 12:34:50 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 11:13:58 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 12:45:47 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 16:58:22 schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:15:40 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
Perhaps udev's
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 12:34:50 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 11:13:58 schrieb Canek Peláez
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 12:45:47 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 16:58:22 schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On 2011-09-08 05:23, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Yeah, first time I installed Linux, it required 512 Mb (if I installed
X), and 16 Mb of memmory. Change happens. I welcome it happily,
because that's how we progress and get even better stuff.
Change is sometimes good, sometimes bad. Something
On 2011-09-08 16:51, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
But the freedom is still there. The freedom to either keep your system
as it is (don't upgrade)
^
You do realise that this is quite valid for Windows (and all other OS's
in existence)? At least so far...
Best regards
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
We already *have* the situation of not requiring initramfs for separate /usr.
Mission accomplished.
It's the upcoming change, that violates
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:35 PM, pk pete...@coolmail.se wrote:
On 2011-09-08 16:51, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
But the freedom is still there. The freedom to either keep your system
as it is (don't upgrade)
^
You do realise that this is quite valid for Windows (and all
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 12:56:44 -0400, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] /dev/sda* missing at boot:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:44 PM, David W Noon dwn...@ntlworld.com
wrote:
[snip]
I expect to switch my simpler systems away from udev to mdev. This
loses some functionality of
On 2011-09-08 19:47, Michael Mol wrote:
Outdated operating systems make baby coder cry.
I like making baby coders cry... :-
;-)
Best regards
Peter K
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:30 PM, pk pete...@coolmail.se wrote:
On 2011-09-08 05:23, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Yeah, first time I installed Linux, it required 512 Mb (if I installed
X), and 16 Mb of memmory. Change happens. I welcome it happily,
because that's how we progress and get even
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:35 PM, pk pete...@coolmail.se wrote:
On 2011-09-08 16:51, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
But the freedom is still there. The freedom to either keep your system
as it is (don't upgrade)
^
You do realise that this is quite valid for Windows (and all
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
We already *have* the situation of not requiring initramfs for
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:35 PM, pk pete...@coolmail.se wrote:
On 2011-09-08 16:51, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
But the freedom is still there. The freedom to either keep your system
as it is (don't upgrade)
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:05 PM, David W Noon dwn...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 12:56:44 -0400, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] /dev/sda* missing at boot:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:44 PM, David W Noon dwn...@ntlworld.com
wrote:
[snip]
I expect to switch my
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
This isn't a discussion. This is a bunch of people offering
displeasure, ideas and/or thoughts, and one person saying, hey,
nothing I can do. I trust
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:35 PM, pk pete...@coolmail.se wrote:
^
You do realise that this is quite valid for Windows (and all
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:13:58 -0400
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you *ever* thought about machines, that are not x86 or x86_64?
Here's an intersting read:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/72769
No, I haven't thought about them, because I don't use
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
This isn't a discussion. This is a bunch of people offering
displeasure, ideas
On Thursday 08 Sep 2011 04:52:44 BRM wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com
Hmm ... what is the error/warning that comes up?
pneumo-martyr wpa_supplicant # /etc/init.d/net.wlan0 start
* Bringing up interface wlan0
* Starting wpa_supplicant on
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:11:04 +0200
Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Then design the correct solution and implement it. If it's
technically sound, it will prevail. I think it's a rather
complicated problem with a non trivial solution, but the code is
there if you feel like give
On Wednesday 07 Sep 2011 21:48:44 Harry Putnam wrote:
Stefano Crocco stefano.cro...@alice.it writes:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . you have to click on the Opera
button, just below the title bar and at the left of the first open
tab. A menu will popup.
Many thanks friend. That one
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:13:58 -0400
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you *ever* thought about machines, that are not x86 or x86_64?
Here's an intersting read:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:11:04 +0200
Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Then design the correct solution and implement it. If it's
technically sound, it will prevail. I think it's a rather
complicated
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:32:27 -0400
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
An initramfs is optional becuase i can disable it in the kernel. I
would like to keep that optional.
udev at some point was optional,
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 15:13:55 -0400, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] /dev/sda* missing at boot:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:05 PM, David W Noon dwn...@ntlworld.com
wrote:
[snip]
I don't know if the kernel offers any particular blessing to any
hotplug handler.
udev is the
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
[ big fat snip ]
Why is it so hard for these same maintainers to leave things as they
are? It is not broken currently
I really need to get some work done, so I will keep it shortly,
because this is a dup of the CUPS
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 16:21:11 -0400
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not have an initramfs, do not
need one, see no need to have one and have not yet seen a valid
technical reason for why having one is ideal.
It's not ideal (I don't think anybody has said that). Almost
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 22:05:36 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:11:04 +0200
Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Then design the correct solution and implement it. If it's
technically sound, it will prevail. I think it's a rather
complicated problem
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:25 PM, David W Noon dwn...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 15:13:55 -0400, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] /dev/sda* missing at boot:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:05 PM, David W Noon dwn...@ntlworld.com
wrote:
[snip]
I don't know if the kernel
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 16:23:36 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
In what valid way does access to /usr become something that udev may be
required to support?
It is a matter of what else do you end having in /bin and /lib.
Remember that udev rules can execute arbitrary code. Do all
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 21:25:31 +0100
David W Noon dwn...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Well, then you already know what to do.
Indeed I do.
If your databases are not ASE or Oracle, then migrating to FreeBSD is a
fine option. It's what we did at work. The benefits were immediate:
- we didn't lose the
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 16:21:11 -0400
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not have an initramfs, do not
need one, see no need to have one and have not yet seen a valid
technical reason for why having one
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 16:23:36 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
In what valid way does access to /usr become something that udev may be
required to support?
It is a matter of what else do you end having in
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:40:07 +0200
Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 22:05:36 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:11:04 +0200
Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Then design the correct solution and implement it. If it's
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry you read that way; I keep trying to explain why I don't find a
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I htink almost everyone understand this. Regards.
I think you are one of *very* few that understands this.
This reminds me of a old joke. One in four people have a mental issue.
Check three friends and if they are OK, you are it. Again, it is a joke
but my
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 16:48:45 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 16:23:36 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
In what valid way does access to /usr become something that udev
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 16:23:36 -0400
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a matter of what else do you end having in /bin and /lib.
Remember that udev rules can execute arbitrary code. Do all that code
needs to be moved to /bin and /lib also?
Why should it not move to /bin and /lib?
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 22:56:07 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:40:07 +0200
Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 22:05:36 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:11:04 +0200
Michael Schreckenbauer
On Thursday 08 Sep 2011 09:29:38 ifj. Stefán István wrote:
Hello!
I've installed vmware-player, but can't start it. It outputs a lot of
messages (none of them seems to be error msgs) and gives back the prompt:
localhost ~ # vmplayer
Logging to /tmp/vmware-root/setup-8401.log
filename:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 16:48:45 -0400
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer
grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 16:23:36 schrieb Canek Peláez
Valdés:
In what valid way does access to /usr become something that
- Original Message -
From: Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com
On Thursday 08 Sep 2011 04:52:44 BRM wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com
Hmm ... what is the error/warning that comes up?
pneumo-martyr wpa_supplicant # /etc/init.d/net.wlan0
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 16:46:25 -0400
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
The only simple answer I have is this one: if it is so simple, then it
would work this way.
It isn't. If I am wrong (and, of course, that is possible), someone
will come out and do it, and you guys will be able to
Hi, all.
Forgive me butting in at a random place in this rather heated thread,
but
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:43:29PM +0200, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 16:23:36 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
In what valid way does access to /usr become something that
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 23:06:43 +0200
Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Thanks, Alan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_question
;)
Oops :-)
I need to pay more attention to everything that everyone posts. I
didn't know enough (or couldn't remember enough) to judge how many or
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 21:29:40 +
Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
Hi, all.
Forgive me butting in at a random place in this rather heated thread,
but
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:43:29PM +0200, Michael Schreckenbauer
wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 16:23:36 schrieb Canek
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 23:44:41 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 21:29:40 +
Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
Would it not be possible to have a minimal /usr tree in the root
partition for udev's use at boot time, and to later mount a more
robust /usr partition
On 9/8/2011 12:52 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
So, a different scenario, then: Sometimes I need to log stuffs (via
ULOG) or do a tcpdump. Will JFS give me additional benefit to ext4? Or
should I just stick with ext4?
Simplest performance gain for appends is to drop atime/dirtime from the
file or
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 23:38:01 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 23:06:43 +0200
Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Thanks, Alan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_question
;)
Oops :-)
I need to pay more attention to everything that everyone
Unless I misunderstood this and referenced threads, all this agro is being
generated because udev devs decided to give primacy not to the linux fs and
prevailing FHS conventions, but their udev code and what may have been an easy
workaround for them?
Given that I do not understand the ins and
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 11:44:41PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Would it not be possible to have a minimal /usr tree in the root
partition for udev's use at boot time, and to later mount a more
robust /usr partition over this? What am I missing here?
A big problem will be that the package
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 16:48:45 -0400
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer
grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 16:23:36 schrieb Canek
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Unless I misunderstood this and referenced threads, all this agro is being
generated because udev devs decided to give primacy not to the linux fs and
prevailing FHS conventions, but their udev code and what may have been an
OK, so if you restore the two lines and this error goes away, can you then
initialise the device without any other errors?
Assuming that rfkill shows all is unlocked and the device active, what does
iwlist wlan0 scan show now?
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 16:42:04 -0400, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] /dev/sda* missing at boot:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:25 PM, David W Noon dwn...@ntlworld.com
wrote:
[snip]
They work currently.
So you want all the new functionality, but without needing to do
anything.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I htink almost everyone understand this. Regards.
I think you are one of *very* few that understands this.
This reminds me of a old joke. One in four people have a mental issue.
Check three
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:39:21 -0400
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com
wrote:
Unless I misunderstood this and referenced threads, all this agro
is being generated because udev devs decided to give primacy not to
the
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:28:24 +0200
Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 23:38:01 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 23:06:43 +0200
Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Thanks, Alan
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 22:31:15 +
Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 11:44:41PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Would it not be possible to have a minimal /usr tree in the root
partition for udev's use at boot time, and to later mount a more
robust /usr partition
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:36:56 -0400
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 16:48:45 -0400
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:39:21 -0400
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com
wrote:
Unless I misunderstood this and referenced threads, all this agro
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 22:45:21 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] /dev/sda* missing at boot:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 21:25:31 +0100
David W Noon dwn...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Well, then you already know what to do.
Indeed I do.
If your databases are not ASE or Oracle, then
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:36:56 -0400
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 16:48:45 -0400
Canek Peláez Valdés
I just noticed this at the end of my openssl emerge:
* Running 'c_rehash /etc/ssl/certs/' to rebuild hashes #333069 ...
WARNING: Skipping duplicate file cert_igca_rsa.pem [ ok ]
dev-libs/openssl-1.0.0e merged.
Since SSL is so critical I thought I should run it by you guys. Is
this something I
Hi,
I am using a IBM Model M (139031) with my Linux Box and a Belkin
PS2/USB/converter (active) To connect the PS2 cord to my PC (Chesen
Electronics Corp. PS/2 Keyboard+Mouse Adapter).
As long as I am booting the PC everything is fine.
But if I wake the PC from hibernate, the keyboard get
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:29:38 +0200
ifj. Stefán István iste...@stef.hu wrote:
Hello!
I've installed vmware-player, but can't start it. It outputs a lot of
messages
[ 8 ]
It wont start even if I add a virtual machine config file parameter
to vmplayer.
Is there any trick to start it?
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I htink almost everyone understand this. Regards.
I think you are one of *very* few that understands this.
This reminds me of a old joke. One in four people have a mental
Hi There,
I am trying to install Gentoo dual boot on a MacBook Pro (17 inch). I
have refit installed, but the problem is that I cannot boot from the CD
(the option is not available in the menu). I was wondering if someone
knows how to do it.
Thanks,
Moshe
Moshe Kamensky moshe.kamen...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi There,
I am trying to install Gentoo dual boot on a MacBook Pro (17 inch). I
have refit installed, but the problem is that I cannot boot from the CD
(the option is not available in the menu). I was wondering if someone
knows how to
* cov...@ccs.covici.com cov...@ccs.covici.com [08/09/11 23:18]:
Moshe Kamensky moshe.kamen...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi There,
I am trying to install Gentoo dual boot on a MacBook Pro (17 inch). I
have refit installed, but the problem is that I cannot boot from the CD
(the option is
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:58:21 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 19:08:21 -0400
David Relson rel...@osagesoftware.com wrote:
G'day,
I'm having a problem with VirtualBox and am looking for ideas.
As background, I'm running virtualbox-bin-4.1.2 on a
2.6.39-gentoo-r2
* Moshe Kamensky moshe.kamen...@googlemail.com [08/09/11 23:30]:
* cov...@ccs.covici.com cov...@ccs.covici.com [08/09/11 23:18]:
Moshe Kamensky moshe.kamen...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi There,
I am trying to install Gentoo dual boot on a MacBook Pro (17 inch). I
have refit
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
