On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:25:11PM +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote
On Thursday, September 15, 2011 01:43:17 PM Canek Pel??ez Vald??s wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Canek Pel??ez Vald??s can...@gmail.com
wrote:
(This mail is to keep the guys un -user in the loop about -devel).
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 19:31:31 -0400
Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
There are two principle things I dislike about D-Bus.
1) It doesn't support live upgrading of the daemon. We discussed the
reasons behind this several weeks ago, as I recall. Transparent
session control handoff is, of
On 2011-09-18 09:37, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Other systems may start to use it if it proves itself useful. Lucky for
us, it doesn't obsolete anything else, just adds functionality to what
is already there.
Although, one thing which I find very annoying is that the things that
depend on it
On 2011-09-18 12:03, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
And what is your problem with dbus anyway? I bet you can't even measure a
difference between dbus running and dbus not running in speed or
responsiveness of your gui.
Not my specific case(s) but a quick google gave this:
On 9/17/11, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/11/2011 the SP 500 was within about .1% of where
it was on 9/10/2001. The 'Lost Decade'...
You lucky and prosperous bastards! Take a look at some major European
indexes over the same time span. DAX for example. :D
--
Arttu V.
Am Sonntag 18 September 2011, 12:44:04 schrieb pk:
On 2011-09-18 12:03, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
And what is your problem with dbus anyway? I bet you can't even measure
a
difference between dbus running and dbus not running in speed or
responsiveness of your gui.
Not my specific
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Sonntag 18 September 2011, 11:23:43 schrieb pk:
On 2011-09-18 09:37, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Other systems may start to use it if it proves itself useful. Lucky for
us, it doesn't obsolete anything else,
On 2011-09-18 14:32, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
So you are going from a single bug to 'it must be evil'. If you do that all
the time there isn't much software left.
You said: I bet you can't even measure a
difference between dbus running and dbus not running in speed or
responsiveness of
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 9:19 AM, pk pete...@coolmail.se wrote:
On 2011-09-18 14:32, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
So you are going from a single bug to 'it must be evil'. If you do that all
the time there isn't much software left.
You said: I bet you can't even measure a
difference between
Am Sonntag 18 September 2011, 09:15:25 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Sonntag 18 September 2011, 11:23:43 schrieb pk:
On 2011-09-18 09:37, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Other systems may start to use it if
Am Sonntag 18 September 2011, 15:19:29 schrieb pk:
On 2011-09-18 14:32, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
So you are going from a single bug to 'it must be evil'. If you do that
all the time there isn't much software left.
You said: I bet you can't even measure a
difference between dbus running
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Sonntag 18 September 2011, 15:19:29 schrieb pk:
again, if it you say 'it must be bad because there is a bug in it' you can
disregard all software ever written.
This is why, when designing systems, you
On Saturday, September 17, 2011 02:43:00 PM Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Joost Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org
wrote:
On Friday, September 16, 2011 10:53:47 AM Canek Peláez Valdés
Alex Schuster wonko at wonkology.org writes:
When you run kde-4 on gentoo and use the kde-login-manager app
are the login sessions recorded into a permanent or temporary file?
If you want to know, who is logged in and when someone logged in, check
the man page for utmp / wtmp. These files
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Ah. I see now. So, it mounts proc and sys but that is in the init then
it mounts the real root outside the init. Then it umounts the proc and sys
under the init and then switches to the real root and starts init
On Sep 18, 2011 9:50 PM, Joost Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Saturday, September 17, 2011 02:43:00 PM Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
As I keep saying: code talks.
Yes, but the developers are quiet with regards to that patch.
I can understand if it takes some time to analyse a patch,
On 09/12/2011 05:42 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Thanks! A bashrc with the following in it seems to work here just fine:
post_src_unpack() {
epatch_user
}
Also, the epatch_user() docs mention that it's safe to call epatch_user
multiple times, so I support no breakages should be expected with
On 2011-09-18 14:56, Alan McKinnon wrote:
And he's using Audacious - a fork of a gigantic bug nest (mms) .
According to his earlier post, it forces dbus to run.
Xmms, I believe it's called. And it's been working fine for quite a
while (I've actually have never encountered a bug with
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:55:01 +0200
pk pete...@coolmail.se wrote:
Xmms, I believe it's called. And it's been working fine for quite a
while (I've actually have never encountered a bug with Audacious), for
me. Now, when I upgraded to 2.4.x dbus was forced on me (well, that
and Xfce4)... I'm
On 2011-09-18 15:31, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Hey, that's really cool.
I agree.
Just don't expect everybody to run our systems without the modern
parts of the stack just because a Commodore 64 cannot run it.
I think you need to take a closer look; it does support a lot of
modern parts of
On 2011-09-18 19:41, Indi wrote:
Install mpd, mpc, and ncmpc. Read the man pages, live happily ever
after.
Ok, I'll look into it. Thanks!
Best regards
Peter K
Dear All!
I think Google Chrome/Chromium is an excellent browser and I have been
using it for a year or more. But there is one issue which is
disturbing me and I would like to know what is your experience.
If I open more than 2-3 URL fast way the loading tabs and other
already opened pages
András Csányi wrote:
Dear All!
I think Google Chrome/Chromium is an excellent browser and I have been
using it for a year or more. But there is one issue which is
disturbing me and I would like to know what is your experience.
If I open more than 2-3 URL fast way the loading tabs and other
I've been looking around for a way to install gentoo just by plopping
an ISO into a known partition,.
I'm not getting much from google on this search string:
install gentoo directly from iso. Or I should say:
I've found a couple of how toos but they involve quite a lot of mumbo
jumbo like
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:55:01 +0200
pk pete...@coolmail.se wrote:
And he's using Audacious - a fork of a gigantic bug nest (mms) .
According to his earlier post, it forces dbus to run.
Xmms, I believe it's called. And it's been working fine for quite a
while (I've actually have never
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 17:13:36 -0400, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
ORBit was the GNOME implementation of ORB; I don't remember what KDE
used, but I believe it was also ORB based.
KDE 2/3 used DCOP, their own IPC as there was no decent standard system
at the time. DBus was heavily influenced by
On 18.09.2011 21:01, Harry Putnam wrote:
I've been looking around for a way to install gentoo just by plopping
an ISO into a known partition,.
I'm not getting much from google on this search string:
install gentoo directly from iso. Or I should say:
I've found a couple of how toos
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 1:43 PM, pk pete...@coolmail.se wrote:
I think you need to take a closer look; it does support a lot of
modern parts of the stack (as you call it); it's just focused on the
things that matters (for an embedded system). It is the mindset that I'm
after; it seems even
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 00:49:21 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
A word of advice when starting from scratch, give your VG(s) unique
names. I've seen what happens when someone takes a drive from
one Fedora system and puts it in another, so there are two VGs called
vg01. It ain't nice (only one
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:25 PM, András Csányi sayusi.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All!
I think Google Chrome/Chromium is an excellent browser and I have been
using it for a year or more. But there is one issue which is
disturbing me and I would like to know what is your experience.
If I open
I just did a routine update on my ~amd64 machine and saw the portage
warning that libpng14 has been replaced by libpng15, and I should run
revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib/libpng14.so' and then delete the
obsolete library.
That's what I did. I confess I wasn't watching, so I may have missed
On 09/18/2011 09:42 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 09/12/2011 05:42 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Thanks! A bashrc with the following in it seems to work here just fine:
post_src_unpack() {
epatch_user
}
Also, the epatch_user() docs mention that it's safe to call epatch_user
multiple
On 09/18/2011 11:27 PM, walt wrote:
On 09/18/2011 09:42 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 09/12/2011 05:42 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Thanks! A bashrc with the following in it seems to work here just fine:
post_src_unpack() {
epatch_user
}
Also, the epatch_user() docs mention that it's safe
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 4:10 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
I just did a routine update on my ~amd64 machine and saw the portage
warning that libpng14 has been replaced by libpng15, and I should run
revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib/libpng14.so' and then delete the
obsolete library.
Nikos Chantziaras writes:
On 09/18/2011 11:27 PM, walt wrote:
On 09/18/2011 09:42 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I came across some ebuilds that result in:
* QA Notice: command not found:
*
* /etc/portage/bashrc: line 3: epatch_user: command not found
How do I solve
on 09/18/2011 11:10 PM walt wrote the following:
I just did a routine update on my ~amd64 machine and saw the portage
warning that libpng14 has been replaced by libpng15, and I should run
revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib/libpng14.so' and then delete the
obsolete library.
snip
This fixed the
On 09/18/2011 11:50 PM, Alex Schuster wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras writes:
On 09/18/2011 11:27 PM, walt wrote:
On 09/18/2011 09:42 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I came across some ebuilds that result in:
* QA Notice: command not found:
*
* /etc/portage/bashrc: line 3:
Nikos Chantziaras writes:
On 09/18/2011 11:50 PM, Alex Schuster wrote:
Do these ebuilds also need to apply the patches, or do you just want
to get rid of the error message?
It's just the error message. Which means this isn't an issue for now.
It will become one if one of them will
On Sunday 18 Sep 2011 21:57:29 Thanasis wrote:
on 09/18/2011 11:10 PM walt wrote the following:
I just did a routine update on my ~amd64 machine and saw the portage
warning that libpng14 has been replaced by libpng15, and I should run
revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib/libpng14.so' and then
On Sun, Sep 18 2011, walt wrote:
I just did a routine update on my ~amd64 machine and saw the portage
warning that libpng14 has been replaced by libpng15, and I should run
revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib/libpng14.so' and then delete the
obsolete library.
After that I ran plain
On Saturday 17 September 2011 13:44:39 Alan McKinnon wrote:
[GUIDs] are not the best thing to work with admittedly, but they are
guaranteed to be unique for all reasonable human needs. In a world
when we plug things out of anything and plug them back into anything,
a guaranteed unique ID is a
On Saturday 17 September 2011 12:34:54 Dale wrote:
Does LVM make the heads move around more or anything like that? I'm
just thinking it would depending on what lv are on what drives. I
dunno, just curious.
I haven't thought about that, but my first impression is that LVM won't make
any
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 11:25:44 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
Now I can finally print normally, and removed foo2zjs completely from
my computer. Wooohoo. :)
What printer do you have. I use foo2zjs with a LaserJet 1022 and thought
it was the only way, not that it causes me any problems.
--
Neil
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:58:14 -0400
Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18 2011, walt wrote:
I just did a routine update on my ~amd64 machine and saw the portage
warning that libpng14 has been replaced by libpng15, and I should
run revdep-rebuild --library
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 23:02:45 +0100
Peter Humphrey pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Saturday 17 September 2011 13:44:39 Alan McKinnon wrote:
[GUIDs] are not the best thing to work with admittedly, but they are
guaranteed to be unique for all reasonable human needs. In a world
when we
Harry Putnam reader at newsguy.com writes:
http://nlug.ml1.co.uk/2011/06/boot-livecd-iso-image-from-hdd/305
I can follow that alright but first wanted to make sure there
is not a well established mainstream way of doing it.
Curious.
I was going to attempt an installation directly from a
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 06:59:44PM +0100, Mick wrote
The only drawback is the 2 minutes it will take a user the first time this
change is introduced to build the initramfs and change the kernel line in
grub.conf. I am warming up to this proposal because it seems to me that it
will end up
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday 17 September 2011 12:34:54 Dale wrote:
Does LVM make the heads move around more or anything like that? I'm
just thinking it would depending on what lv are on what drives. I
dunno, just curious.
I haven't thought about that, but my first impression is
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 11:25:44 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
Now I can finally print normally, and removed foo2zjs completely from
my computer. Wooohoo. :)
What printer do you have. I use foo2zjs with a LaserJet 1022 and
49 matches
Mail list logo
