On Saturday 28 November 2009 02:01:22 Mick wrote:
To find out what depends on kate, kweather and kfloppy, use the correct
portage tool:
a...@nazgul ~ $ equery depends -a kate
* Searching for kate ...
kde-base/kdesdk-meta-4.3.1 (=kde-base/kate-4.3.1:4.3[kdeprefix=])
On Saturday 28 November 2009 13:22:14 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 28 November 2009 02:01:22 Mick wrote:
To find out what depends on kate, kweather and kfloppy, use the correct
portage tool:
a...@nazgul ~ $ equery depends -a kate
* Searching for kate ...
On Saturday 28 November 2009 21:32:28 Mick wrote:
I suppose one could make several useful -meta packages DEPEND on kate, as
many users want kate and do not want the entire kdesdk package. But that
causes the same app to appear in more than one -meta package and the
devs seem to want to
On Saturday 28 November 2009 19:42:33 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 28 November 2009 21:32:28 Mick wrote:
I suppose one could make several useful -meta packages DEPEND on kate,
as many users want kate and do not want the entire kdesdk package. But
that causes the same app to appear in
2009/11/26 James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon at gmail.com writes:
grep kde /var/lib/portage/world
only kde-meta in there
emerge -a --depclean
yep, just making sure as I thought there might be a
very special syntax to remove all kde 3.5.*
I used
Mick michaelkintzios at gmail.com writes:
Hmm, I thought that kweather, kate and kfloppy were brought in by some
meta or other. It seems that I'll have to install these on their own?
Hello Mick,
I'm just not certain any more exactly which packages belong to
which meta(kde) package. I think
On Friday 27 November 2009 17:27:30 James wrote:
Mick michaelkintzios at gmail.com writes:
Hmm, I thought that kweather, kate and kfloppy were brought in by some
meta or other. It seems that I'll have to install these on their own?
Hello Mick,
I'm just not certain any more exactly
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:34:34 James wrote:
kde-4.3.1 went smooth, except
for I have to manually removed all the kde-3.5 packages.
It had kde-meta-3.5.10. Is there some syntax or a better
method to insure all the kde-3.5.x packages are removed,
without a manual
On Friday 27 November 2009 23:07:25 Jörg Schaible wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:34:34 James wrote:
kde-4.3.1 went smooth, except
for I have to manually removed all the kde-3.5 packages.
It had kde-meta-3.5.10. Is there some syntax or a better
method to
On Friday 27 November 2009 15:53:41 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Friday 27 November 2009 17:27:30 James wrote:
Mick michaelkintzios at gmail.com writes:
Hmm, I thought that kweather, kate and kfloppy were brought in by some
meta or other. It seems that I'll have to install these on their own?
Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon at gmail.com writes:
grep kde /var/lib/portage/world
only kde-meta in there
emerge -a --depclean
yep, just making sure as I thought there might be a
very special syntax to remove all kde 3.5.*
I used revdep-rebuild and emerge -uDNvp world to get the
list of
11 matches
Mail list logo
