Hi, Mark.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 08:29:47AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
Run something like
emerge --noreplace =gentoo-sources-2.6.38-r1
That's just the job. Thanks.
HTH,
Mark
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
Hi, Nick.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:00:49PM +0100, Mick wrote:
On Monday 25 April 2011 16:03:21 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
As a matter of interest, do you know how to configure a framebuffer
console to fill up a wide screen (say, to a width of 170 characters)
as contrasted with the 128
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:16:39 +0100, Mick wrote:
It's rarely desirable to enable doc globally. It is best to enable
only for those packages where you need extended documentation.
@Alan Mackenzie:
What Neil is saying can be achieved by setting package specific USE
flags in the file
On Monday 25 April 2011 08:30:58 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:16:39 +0100, Mick wrote:
It's rarely desirable to enable doc globally. It is best to enable
only for those packages where you need extended documentation.
@Alan Mackenzie:
What Neil is saying can be
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:49:35 +0100, Mick wrote:
What I'm saying is that you should have -doc in /etc/make.conf and
enable it on a per-package basis. The doc flag builds extra
documentation that general users don't need, man/info/html pages are
included by default (at least, that's how it
Hi, Neil.
A happy Easter to everybody who celebrates it, and a very good day to
everybody else!
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:07:15AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:49:35 +0100, Mick wrote:
The doc USE flag is disabled by default on my make.profile
(amd64/10.0/desktop), so
On 25/4/2011, at 11:07am, Neil Bothwick wrote:
...
The doc USE flag is disabled by default on my make.profile
(amd64/10.0/desktop), so although it won't need to be set as -doc in
/etc/make.conf, it will need to be set as doc in the packages that need
it in /etc/portage/package.use.
I
Hi, Mick.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 04:44:05PM +0100, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 24 April 2011 14:25:58 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Mick.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:17:45AM +0100, Mick wrote:
On Saturday 23 April 2011 21:06:25 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 08:46:30PM +0100,
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:18:22 +0100, Stroller wrote:
Maybe I should disable doc, but it seems wrong to me, to miss out on
all this potentially useful information (which admittedly I never use).
The potentially useful information is installed anyway. USE=doc enables
the potentially useless
On Monday 25 April 2011 13:11:53 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Mick.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 04:44:05PM +0100, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 24 April 2011 14:25:58 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Mick.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:17:45AM +0100, Mick wrote:
On Saturday 23 April 2011 21:06:25 Alan
Hi, Mick.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:12:15PM +0100, Mick wrote:
On Monday 25 April 2011 13:11:53 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Once it completes you can run --depclean which will ask you to
remove the older 2.6 python package.
I had to (or, at least, did) run emerge -uND @world. Funnily
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
SNIP
Call me a clinging cry-baby if you like, but until I'm confident about my
new kernel, I'd like to hang on to the old one, including its sources.
It'd also be nice to run --depclean in the meantime. Do I have to do
On Monday 25 April 2011 16:03:21 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Mick.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:12:15PM +0100, Mick wrote:
On Monday 25 April 2011 13:11:53 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Once it completes you can run --depclean which will ask you to
remove the older 2.6 python package.
I
On Sunday 24 April 2011 14:25:58 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Mick.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:17:45AM +0100, Mick wrote:
On Saturday 23 April 2011 21:06:25 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 08:46:30PM +0100, Mick wrote:
What do you get when you run:
# eselect python
On Sunday 24 April 2011 16:44:05 Mick wrote:
On Sunday 24 April 2011 14:25:58 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Mick.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:17:45AM +0100, Mick wrote:
On Saturday 23 April 2011 21:06:25 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 08:46:30PM +0100, Mick wrote:
On 24/4/2011, at 4:44pm, Mick wrote:
...
At this stage you should only run:
python-updater -v
Nothing else.
Doing this today I've had a couple of packages that needed to be emerged with
USE=-doc when they failed.
Stroller.
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:40:02 +0200, Stroller wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Reinstall Gentoo? [Was: Building pygtk-2.22.0-r1 fails.
Help, please!]:
On 24/4/2011, at 4:44pm, Mick wrote:
...
At this stage you should only run:
python-updater -v
Nothing else.
Doing this today I've had
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:17:23 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
Doing this today I've had a couple of packages that needed to be
emerged with USE=-doc when they failed.
Those would be jinja and sphinx. They are notorious for their circular
dependency, which requires USE='-doc' to bypass.
It's
On Sunday 24 April 2011 21:30:33 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:17:23 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
Doing this today I've had a couple of packages that needed to be
emerged with USE=-doc when they failed.
Those would be jinja and sphinx. They are notorious for their circular
19 matches
Mail list logo
