Hi,
We want to start using Gromacs on GPU and we are debating whether to purchase
GeForce GTX card or Tesla platform. Looking at the published data it seems
GTX580 has much impressive performance compared to Tesla C2050, and of course
it is much cheaper. Is there a reason to prefer Tesla
Hi,
In the long term the Tesla is much more preferable as the GTX would not support
certain high end functions. Pls verify these before you purchase one. Also the
Tesla C-2070 is the newer one available and with 6.0GB RAM it really gives out
great performance. The price is the same.
Rgds
JSV
Dear All,
I was trying to run NVT equilibration for cyclohexane. When I
started running it shows following error
Reading file nvt.tpr, VERSION 4.5.4 (double precision)
Starting 2 threads
Making 1D domain decomposition 2 x 1 x 1
starting mdrun 'Cyclohexane box'
5 steps,100.0
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Ravi Kumar Venkatraman
ravikumarvenkatra...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All,
I was trying to run NVT equilibration for cyclohexane. When I
started running it shows following error
Reading file nvt.tpr, VERSION 4.5.4 (double precision)
Starting 2 threads
On 4/08/2011 5:03 PM, Ravi Kumar Venkatraman wrote:
Dear All,
I was trying to run NVT equilibration for cyclohexane.
When I started running it shows following error
Reading file nvt.tpr, VERSION 4.5.4 (double precision)
Starting 2 threads
Making 1D domain decomposition 2 x 1 x 1
Hello,
Is there any way to output the dipole moment averaged over all molecules or for
each molecule separately (and not the total dipole moment of the simulation
box) ?
Apparently the dipole autocorrelation function can be obtained as an average
over all molecules with the '-corr mol'
Dear gmxers,
I try to perform NPT MD to obtain the density of system. But the value of
density does not stablize even after over 40 ns. The content of mdp file can be
seen below. How to deal with it? Please give me some hints. Thanks a lot for
any replies.
.mdp file:
title
On 04/08/11, xiaowu759 xiaowu...@qq.com wrote:
Dear gmxers,
I try to perform NPT MD to obtain the density of system. But the value of
density does not stablize even after over 40 ns. The content of mdp file can
be seen below. How to deal with it? Please give me some hints. Thanks a lot
Yun Shi wrote:
Hi all,
I am working with GROMOS 53a6 ff in GROMACS 4.5, and I assume a
Lennard-Jones interaction function was used for short-range vdw
interactions.
From the reference paper /A Biomolecular Force Field Based on the Free
Enthalpy of Hydration and Solvation: The GROMOS
Hi
I am trying to use g_membed to insert a protein into a bilayer. I made some
changes to the sample.mdp file downloaded from the authors' homepage. The
changes were:
- reduced time step to 0.001 ps (instead of 0.002)
- changed constraints to hbonds instead of all-bonds.
g_membed runs fine, but
Please leave discussion on the mailing list so that the archives are available
for posterity and that you might get input from more than one person.
Apparently your .log file has been truncated abnormally, but the energy values
reported are clearly indicative of
Hi Dear Users!
I'm Using MMB to produce initial structures for my simulations.
This program creating a .pdb file in output.
The output file containing Hydrogen atoms that are not recognized by gromos53a5.
I want to edit my pdb file but I can't find anything about hydrogen types in
gromos!
any
Amir Abbasi wrote:
Hi Dear Users!
I'm Using MMB to produce initial structures for my simulations.
This program creating a .pdb file in output.
The output file containing Hydrogen atoms that are not recognized by
gromos53a5.
I want to edit my pdb file but I can't find anything about hydrogen
On 04/08/11, Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
Yun Shi wrote:
Hi all,
I am working with GROMOS 53a6 ff in GROMACS 4.5, and I assume a
Lennard-Jones interaction function was used for short-range vdw interactions.
From the reference paper /A Biomolecular Force Field Based on
Hi!
I want to simulate an RNA molecule.
I have the .pdb file of that.
I want to create an Argon wall and make a hole on it to pull my molecule
through it.
Argon defined in OPLS/AA force field. but it has not nucleic acids.
how can i define the argon in other force fields?
--
gmx-users mailing
Amir Abbasi wrote:
Hi!
I want to simulate an RNA molecule.
I have the .pdb file of that.
I want to create an Argon wall and make a hole on it to pull my molecule
through it.
Argon defined in OPLS/AA force field. but it has not nucleic acids.
how can i define the argon in other force
Florian,
I am not sure, which of the output files of g_current contains the dipole
moment for each molecule. Applying g_current to a trajectory of four molecules
of asparagin in water gives the following output:
g_current -s tpr_200ps.tpr -f xtcIRWhole_100-200ps.xtc -eps 80 -o current.xvg
Dear Gromacs Users,
I used PRODRG server in order to obtain the topology file for my molecule (52
atoms with all hydrogens). However, server generated Gromacs topology which
involves 47 atoms (for PDB file with polar/aromatic hydrogens). Whether I will
use the pdb file with missing 4
Marzinek, Jan wrote:
Dear Gromacs Users,
I used PRODRG server in order to obtain the topology file for my
molecule (52 atoms with all hydrogens). However, server generated
Gromacs topology which involves 47 atoms (for PDB file with
polar/aromatic hydrogens). Whether I will use the pdb
Hi Justin and Mark,
Thank you very much for the reply.
I was using table 7 (Normal van der Waals Parameters) to calculate
non-bonded vdw interactions that are not between third neighbors, such as
CH1 carbons between different chains in a biomolecular system. Anything
wrong here?
I understand
Yun Shi wrote:
Hi Justin and Mark,
Thank you very much for the reply.
I was using table 7 (Normal van der Waals Parameters) to calculate
non-bonded vdw interactions that are not between third neighbors, such
as CH1 carbons between different chains in a biomolecular system.
Anything wrong
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 15:49 +0100, Kukol, Andreas wrote:
Florian,
I am not sure, which of the output files of g_current contains the dipole
moment for each molecule. Applying g_current to a trajectory of four
molecules of asparagin in water gives the following output:
To obtain the
Hi,
Tesla cards won't give you much benefit when it comes to running the
current Gromacs. Additionally, I can tell you so much that this won't
change in the future either. The only advantage of the C20x0-s is ECC
and double precision - which is ATM anyway not supported in Gromacs on
GPUs.
Dear Gromacs User,
Gromacs *trr file has the velocities. They are for translational motions.
But how can we get the angular velocities?
Thanks for the information!
Tom
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the
Hi Justin,
I got it now. During the 10fs, even water molecules with a speed of 500 m/s
only have a 0.005 nm displacement, which is far less than than 0.9 nm or 1.4
nm.
Thanks again!
Yun
Yun Shi wrote:
Hi Justin and Mark,
Thank you very much for the reply.
I was using table 7 (Normal van
On 4/08/2011 7:17 AM, Size Zheng wrote:
Hi Mark,
When I used the g_traj with options of -ekt and -ekr, i made a selection as
follow
Group 0 ( System) has 6400 elements
Group 1 (TP4) has 6400 elements
Select a group: 1
Selected 1: 'TP4'
So according to you that
On 5/08/2011 6:08 AM, Tom wrote:
Dear Gromacs User,
Gromacs *trr file has the velocities. They are for translational motions.
But how can we get the angular velocities?
Angular velocities with respect to what?
Mark
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
Dear all,
I want to use Gromacs to run an enhanced sampling molecular dynamics
(ESMD) proposed by Karplus’s group (J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1990) 112, 9161-9175.
J. Mol. Biol. (1999) 291, 101-115). In the ESMD simulation, we need to
exclude the interactions (especially the Coulomb interactions)
Hi Tom,
TRR files contain velocities for individual atoms as a function of
time, which is all the velocity information there is in an MD
simulation. You can reduce that information to rotation about a
principle molecular axis, or rotation with respect to the simulation
box, or whatever you need.
On 5/08/2011 1:17 PM, DeChang Li wrote:
Dear all,
I want to use Gromacs to run an enhanced sampling molecular dynamics
(ESMD) proposed by Karplus's group (J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1990) 112,
9161-9175. J. Mol. Biol. (1999) 291, 101-115). In the ESMD
simulation, we need to exclude the
30 matches
Mail list logo