Yeah it was a permission error. It confused me because it happened mid
stream. Sorry for wasting people time. ::)
Thanks,
Ilya
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.auwrote:
Ilya Chorny wrote:
I get the following and my job crashes. Is this just an i/o issue
)
There are 195892 donors and 195892 acceptors
There are 280210 hydrogen bonds
Checking for duplicate atoms
Opening library file
/data0/software/gromacs-4.0.4_cvs/share/top/specbond.dat
7 out of 7 lines of specbond.dat converted succesfully
Thanks,
Ilya
--
Ilya Chorny Ph.D.
--
Ilya Chorny Ph.D
/NH hydrogens. They don't describe using
heavyh in the paper and there are earlier posts that teach away from using
heavyh.
Thanks,
Ilya
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
Ilya Chorny wrote:
Hi I am running 4.0.3. I wanted to test the 4fs timestep
I am about to purchase some infiniband hardware and was wondering if anybody
on the mailing list has experience/insight into what kinds of hardware to
buy and what to stay away from.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
Ilya Chorny Ph.D.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx
-warnangle = 30
; Convert harmonic bonds to morse potentials
morse= no
--
Ilya Chorny Ph.D.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http
-130.198-130198
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Ilya Chorny icho...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All,
I am trying to run some calibration calculations with 2/4 fs time steps. I
am trying to reproduce the results in the Gromacs 4.0 paper on a
protein/water (not the same protein) system with ~100K
be COM removal so I turned it off to no avail.
Any chance one of the Gromacs people can give me the mdp file from the DHFR
simulation in the 4.0 paper.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.auwrote:
Ilya Chorny wrote:
Forgot column labels on energies
been
minimized and has no major clashes.
Thanks,
Ilya
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Ilya Chorny icho...@gmail.com wrote:
If I plot the K.E(t) and P.E.(t) they are both going down. In an NVE
simulation they should counter balance. I am leaking K.E. somewhere. I reran
with a relaxed P.E(t
requests to the list. Use the www interface
or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
--
Ilya Chorny Ph.D.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org
earlier post by Justin with a similar error message but no
resolution. Anyone have anythoughts?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
Ilya Chorny Ph.D.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
Ilya Chorny wrote:
I created a new ffoplsaa.rtp entry for ASN with a polysacharide attached
to the side chain nitrogen called ASBG. I want to test the new residue by
itself.
When I pdb2gmx it I get the following
Thanks, this very helpful!!!
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 15, 2009, at 3:48 PM, Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
Tsjerk Wassenaar wrote:
Hi,
---
Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 4.0.3
Source code file: pgutil.c, line: 87
between heavy atoms and not hydrogens. Why?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
Ilya Chorny Ph.D.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting
. ARG24) and in others it
list 1 charge group (i.e. ARG 36). Why is this?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
Ilya Chorny Ph.D.
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please
The code would not know that *a priori*. This list is generated before the
frames are analyzed.
Thanks,
Ilya
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
Ilya Chorny wrote:
I have a question about the g_saltbr output. I looked through the mailing
list
...@vt.edu wrote:
Ilya Chorny wrote:
The code would not know that /a priori/. This list is generated before the
frames are analyzed.
I'm not implying that the code is going to pre-judge your system. If what
you've shown is your output, wouldn't it make sense that g_saltbr only
prints
-0.105314
9.004001-0.105302
9.006001-0.105293
--
Ilya Chorny Ph.D.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting
that it jumps
around at 1 ps intervals. If I set the value of nstxtcout to 1 then my
output looks reasonable. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
Ilya Chorny Ph.D.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx
, lipid, and
water and got a KE that was 1.5RT, 1.2RT, and .8RT respectively. My T is
298K.
My COM removal and T-coupling is for the whole system. I am running 3.3.1.
Is there a problem with T-coupling and COM removal on the whole system?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
Ilya Chorny Ph.D
Scratch my post. I need to learn to read the manual more closely. I thought
the PDO output was the distance and not the deviation from the restrained
position.
Thanks,
Ilya
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Ilya Chorny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to do umbrella sampling
--
Ilya Chorny Ph.D.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list
/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
--
Ilya Chorny Ph.D
://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
--
Ilya Chorny Ph.D.
___
gmx-users mailing list
searched
around for about an hour and could not find anything.
I use trjconv -f *.gro -s *.tpr -center rect -pbc whole -o *.gro.
Any advice?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
Ilya Chorny Ph.D.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org
Just to clarify.
I would run
trjconv -f *.gro -s *.tpr -pbc nojump -o out.gro?
What would I run next?
Thanks,
Ilya
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Xavier Periole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:14:19 -0700
Ilya Chorny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am
Chorny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to clarify.
I would run
trjconv -f *.gro -s *.tpr -pbc nojump -o out.gro?
What would I run next?
Thanks,
Ilya
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Xavier Periole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:14:19 -0700
Ilya Chorny [EMAIL
So I got it to work for my trimer by doing the following.
1.) trjconv -f *.xtc -s *.tpr -pbc nojump -o out.xtc
2.) trjconv -f out.xtc -s *.tpr -pbc mol -center -boxcenter rect
The first step unwraps the whole trajectory and the second step wraps it
back up.
Cheers,
Ilya
--
Ilya Chorny Ph.D
through 64 and 87% @ 128. Not bad
Cheers,
Ilya
--
Ilya Chorny Ph.D.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting
28 matches
Mail list logo