On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
> If you are installing the system using dynamic IP addresses (DHCP or
> BOOTP), then yes, pump would be running. Pump took the place of dhcpc as
> of RH 6.1 I believe.
Red Hat started including pump with RHL 6.0. They still include dhcpcd (the
DH
If you are installing the system using dynamic IP addresses (DHCP or
BOOTP), then yes, pump would be running. Pump took the place of dhcpc as
of RH 6.1 I believe. And, yes, there are problems with pump. Not just in
RH6.1, but in 6.0 as well. In a few docs that I have read, it is highly
recommended
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> [disclaimer: I missed the beginning of this thread somehow, so if this
> post makes no sense, that's why! :)]
>
> If you have it on your system, I think you can use openvt to start a copy
> of say, bash, on a virtual console. I'm not sure if this will actually
>
On Mon, 7 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks, but ps isn't available at that point, even if it might be installed.
> We don't know where to find it. And the processes most likely are
> not running, but waiting on something. If we only knew what that
> something was. I never saw this happe
OK, Now I can answer this one. Two ofthe laptops had 3c589D NICs and the
other one has a 3Com FE574B 10/100 NIC.
Kenny
Thomas Charron wrote:
>Hrm, I hadn't tried using HTTP.What PCMCIA NIC cards did you use?
**
To unsubscribe from this lis
Hi,
>Thanks, but ps isn't available at that point, even if it might be installed.
Do you have proc filesystem? Probably not though. I only installed debian and
slackware so far. Well, a couple of days ago I assisted during a redhat 6.1
install, but it never waited for anything. The only problem wa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Hi,
> >Any ideas on how to see what processes are causing the delay?
> ctrl+alt+F#, root, ps axuw |more? It should work.
> Ferenc
>
Thanks, but ps isn't available at that point, even if it might be installed.
We don't know where to find it. And the processes m
bruary 07, 2000 12:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Laptop installation
>
> Quoting "Lussier, Kenneth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Actually, I have done 3 network installs on laptops using RH 6.1. The
> FTP
> > install never works for me
Quoting "Lussier, Kenneth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Actually, I have done 3 network installs on laptops using RH 6.1. The FTP
> install never works for me because unlike 6.0, you can't do a non-anonymous
> FTP. I ended mounting the CD on a system under the /home/httpd/html/rh
> directory ( I created
oftware) in life are FREE"
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Charron [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 9:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Laptop installation
>
> Quoting PK Whelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I'm
Hi,
>Any ideas on how to see what processes are causing the delay?
ctrl+alt+F#, root, ps axuw |more? It should work.
Ferenc
**
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the su
Quoting PK Whelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm trying to install RH6.1 on a 486 laptop with 16-bit pcmcia slots via
> http.
I myself tried and tried, and what I finally gave up and decided was this:
Under RH 6.1, you can do a network install normally, and you can do a normal
PCMCIA install of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I used pcmcia.img to boot. I get prompted for "driver disk" not sure what
> disk that is. I tried the pcmica disk itself as well as the other images
> and even compiling the pcmcia modules on another linux box and putting
> them on a floppy. I checked RH Install Gui
Hi,
I'm trying to install RH6.1 on a 486 laptop with 16-bit pcmcia slots via
http.
Although I've installed linux on pc's many times, this is my first laptop
install. So here's my problem:
I used pcmcia.img to boot. I get prompted for "driver disk" not sure what
disk that is. I tried the pcmica di
14 matches
Mail list logo
