Re: Python follow-up [modadlug]

2002-01-08 Thread Kevin D. Clark
Bill Sconce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What Eckel says now: ... o Python is executable pseudocode. Perl is executable line noise. o Perl is like vice grips. You can do anything with it, and it's the wrong tool for every job. Just for the record, I disagree

Re: Python follow-up [modadlug]

2002-01-08 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 10:52:51 EST Benjamin Scott said: On 8 Jan 2002, Kevin D. Clark wrote: Just for the record, I disagree with all of this. Can we *please* not get involved in a My language is better than yours debate on this list? :-) At least with vi vs. Emacs, there

Re: Python follow-up [modadlug]

2002-01-08 Thread Kevin D. Clark
mike ledoux [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Err, why are you guys dragging your language war from 'modadlug' (what's 'modadlug'?) to GNHLUG? Please don't. I didn't start a language war. I merely stated that I disagreed with a controversial statement. If I had wanted to start a language war, I

Re: Python follow-up [modadlug]

2002-01-08 Thread Ray Cote
Bill: Thanks for the follow-up (even though it did manage to trigger the juvenile knee-jerk reaction squad into action). I've just finished reading Eckel's Thinking In Python and look forward to more on the subject of Python and Patterns. who's Eckel? sigh Guess I'll have to add that to

Re: Python follow-up [modadlug]

2002-01-08 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, mike ledoux wrote: Err, why are you guys dragging your language war from 'modadlug' (what's 'modadlug'?) to GNHLUG? Please don't. I didn't start a language war. I merely stated that I disagreed with a controversial statement. That may be so, but you stated your

Re: Python follow-up [modadlug]

2002-01-08 Thread Karl J. Runge
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Great, now instead of a debate over which language is best, we're having a debate over whether or not we're having a debate over which language is best. ;-) Well, both languages allow recursion... (as in recursive descent into

Re: Python follow-up [modadlug]

2002-01-08 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 12:19:42 EST Ray Cote said: who's Eckel? sigh Guess I'll have to add that to the 'Who's Knuth?' blank stare I get when I talk about his work. Ahh, I know who Knuth is, just never come across the Eckel name before. -- Seeya, Paul

Re: Python follow-up [modadlug]

2002-01-08 Thread Derek D. Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At some point hitherto, Ray Cote hath spake thusly: who's Eckel? sigh Guess I'll have to add that to the 'Who's Knuth?' blank stare I get when I talk about his work. I haven't ever heard of Eckel either, but there are people who work with

Re: Python follow-up [modadlug]

2002-01-08 Thread ccb
who's Eckel? sigh Guess I'll have to add that to the 'Who's Knuth?' blank stare I get when I talk about his work. Ahh, I know who Knuth is, just never come across the Eckel name before. OK, I specialize in this kind of trivia. Are we talking Bruce Eckel? ccb

Python follow-up [modadlug]

2002-01-07 Thread Bill Sconce
This follow-up is for the folks who kindly endured my Python evangelism at last week's monadlug meeting, plus for anyone else who may be interested in this area of recent developments in Python and/or design patterns. The features we were discussing were iterators and generators, powerful and