I have the following situation and wondered if anyone has any experience
with this and can point me in the right direction. I'm trying to set up a
Beowulf cluster and all machines are running either Red Hat 7.1 or 7.2.
There are 5 computers including the head node plus one system which is the
I can say with all certainty that I know absolutly nothing about
clustering. Never want to, either. It makes my head hurt However,
this sounds like a simple networking setup. The head node would have to
act as a gateway/router. First, turn on IP forwarding (echo 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Putting it under /usr
doesn't really make sense -- /usr is where static files live, not
user data.
This does seem to be a best practice nowadays.
However, there used to be a time when user directories used to be
placed under /usr. Then things changed, and
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But that leaves us with no place to put htdocs. Putting it under /usr
doesn't really make sense -- /usr is where static files live, not user data.
/usr/local/htdocs might make sense, but Red Hat wanted to leave
/usr/local for things not
In a message dated: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 15:03:26 EDT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Another, similar debate is whether /usr/local should be for site-local or
machine-local files. We've had that here before, too.
I've actually flip-flopped my opinion of this one :) I used to
advocate that /usr/local
On 26 Jul 2002, at 2:53pm, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
However, there used to be a time when user directories used to be
placed under /usr.
Right. From what I understand, the embryonic Unix systems were
single-user machines, with a very few top level directories: /src for
source, /bin for
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Ben == [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Anyone used to any other Unix will
Ben find Linux a bit weird in this respect.
Let's re-write this as:
Anyone used to any one particular OS will find another
particular OS a bit wierd in this respect.
I think
In a message dated: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 12:08:02 EDT
Rich Payne said:
On Fri, 26 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 11:20:58 EDT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, at 11:08am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or what /etc/exports is under:
-
In a message dated: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 16:35:52 EDT
Robert Casey said:
Wow, those were quick replies. I will take the advice but I'll have to do
it starting Monday because I'm going home for the weekend, with a headache
I might add.
Print yourself out a copy of the IPChains docs before you go.
I'm giving the FAI (Fully Automatic Installation)
package a test drive at Paul's suggestion and
wonder if anybody here has tried it. I'm hitting
some speedbumps that (I think) have something to
do with my attempts to use FAI's DHCP boot method
with the DHCP server from the dhcpd3 package.
On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, Robert == Robert Casey wrote:
Robert is there a way the slave nodes, which are on the 192
Robert network, can see the 155 network so I don't have to create
Robert all the users on each slave node to match user id and group
Robert id.
Set up IP forwarding on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On 26 Jul 2002, at 2:53pm, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
However, there used to be a time when user directories used to be
placed under /usr.
Right. From what I understand, the embryonic Unix systems were
single-user machines, with a very few top level directories: /src for
On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, Ferenc Tamas Gyurcsan wrote:
FOr some reason, VLC does not produce acceptable speed on my hardware, and
I'm yet to be able to figure out why. My config is pentium III/800 MHz, DVD
speed is 5x (with the best hdparm setting it can handle), software decoder.
Should this
13 matches
Mail list logo
