While we're on the subject of meeting ideas,
http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/MeetingIdeas
is a good place to put them. I've added screen, VNC and the other
remote GUI system I've heard about lately, NX.
On Apr 29, 2006, at 2:00 PM, James R. Van Zandt wrote:
It would
Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I much prefer running emacs within a shell system on the remote
system under screen. If for some reason the connection between the
2 systems is broken, I don't lose anything on the remote system at
all.
I agree screen is very useful. I start long jobs
I agree screen is very useful.
I really loved Screen back in the days of dialup, but it's great when
accessing multiple servers from a lame desktop. PuTTY /or OpenSSH +
screen lets me have manage servers sessions sanely, from anywhere. And
I don't even need Screen on all servers, just my
Using screen sounds like a great presentation for the group! (Hint,
hint!)
On Apr 26, 2006, at 10:08 PM, Paul Lussier wrote:
When I go to work tomorrow,
there will be an xterm already open on my desktop already ssh'ed into
my home system with that same screen session already attached to. If
Ted Roche wrote:
Using screen sounds like a great presentation for the group! (Hint,
hint!)
Speaking as someone who loves screen, but fears and loathes its manpage,
I'm with you! How's about it, Paul?
-K
P.S. Re: the original question, thanks to every who answered; tramp did
the trick
On 4/26/06, Ken D'Ambrosio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I -know- that there's a way to edit a file locally, and then have it be
put in place on a remote system; I've used FTP, but that's now officially
frowned on (being plaintext and all). So I'd like to use ssh or scp or
what-have-you, but,
Ken D'Ambrosio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ted Roche wrote:
Using screen sounds like a great presentation for the group! (Hint,
hint!)
Speaking as someone who loves screen, but fears and loathes its manpage,
I'm with you! How's about it, Paul?
I'd love to, however, as I mentioned
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 12:34 -0400, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
I -know- that there's a way to edit a file locally, and then have it be
put in place on a remote system; I've used FTP, but that's now officially
frowned on (being plaintext and all). So I'd like to use ssh or scp or
what-have-you, but,
See http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/TrampMode
Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
I -know- that there's a way to edit a file locally, and then have it be
put in place on a remote system; I've used FTP, but that's now officially
frowned on (being plaintext and all). So I'd like to use ssh or scp or
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 12:34 pm, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
I -know- that there's a way to edit a file locally, and then have it be
put in place on a remote system; I've used FTP, but that's now officially
frowned on (being plaintext and all). So I'd like to use ssh or scp or
what-have-you,
Ken D'Ambrosio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I -know- that there's a way to edit a file locally, and then have it be
put in place on a remote system; I've used FTP, but that's now officially
frowned on (being plaintext and all). So I'd like to use ssh or scp or
what-have-you, but, while I'm sure
Jerry Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do this very routinely.
The first step with ssh is to make sure that you enable X tunneling.
ssh -x remote-host Then any X based utility you run from that
session on remote-host will show up on your local system.
That's not what he's asking for.
12 matches
Mail list logo
