On 2017-01-10 14:17, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
> Well, that's the other thing that actually wasn't clear:
> whether "an OpenVPN network" meant a multitude of OpenVPN clients
> all connecting individually to a single server (N:1),
> or a network that's being routed (or bridged) through a single
>
On 01/10/2017 01:51 PM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
> On 2017-01-10 13:47, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
>> On 01/10/2017 01:28 PM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
>>> Hey, all. I've got an OpenVPN network talking to a server at a remote
>>> site over the corporate WAN. (Reasons for this are complex, and I won't
On 2017-01-10 13:47, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
> On 01/10/2017 01:28 PM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
>> Hey, all. I've got an OpenVPN network talking to a server at a remote
>> site over the corporate WAN. (Reasons for this are complex, and I
>> won't
>> bore you with them, but please trust me that
On 01/10/2017 01:28 PM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
> Hey, all. I've got an OpenVPN network talking to a server at a remote
> site over the corporate WAN. (Reasons for this are complex, and I won't
> bore you with them, but please trust me that this setup was required
> "because IT.") Anyway, I'd
On 12/26/06, Michael ODonnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about using the LinkSys RV042/82 series router which has dual
wide area network connections and can do load balancing?
Outbound only, I presume, and even that's a good trick.
Inbound aggregation/load balancing would require
On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 21:43 -0500, Ben Scott wrote:
On 12/26/06, hewitt_tech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about using the LinkSys RV042/82 series router which has dual wide area
network connections and can do load balancing?
How about cutting some text when quoting a message? ;-) (Your
On 12/26/06, Michael ODonnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about using the LinkSys RV042/82 series router which has dual
wide area network connections and can do load balancing?
Outbound only, I presume, and even that's a good trick.
Inbound aggregation/load balancing would require
On 12/27/06, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Outbound only, I presume, and even that's a good trick.
Inbound aggregation/load balancing would require cooperation
from the ISP and I suspect they'd rather just sell him a single
go-faster connection for a way larger number of dollars...
On 12/27/06, Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about using the LinkSys RV042/82 series router which has dual
wide area network connections and can do load balancing?
Outbound only, I presume ...
... Trunking ...
Right. Trunking, bonding,link aggregation, teaming are all
about
On 12/26/06, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My partner and I use VPNs to access our employer sites, and we
frequently find that we're bottlenecking on uploads. So we decided to
get a 2nd cable modem so we won't collide with each other.
Small, but important question. What kind of
Thomas Charron wrote:
A go faster then cable connection? Unless he's in the verizon fiber roll
out area, not sure how he'd get that without moocho bucks.
Depends on the cable company. Some throttle the bandwidth for residential
service, but offer a (less) throttled connection for
On 12/27/06, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/26/06, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I actually just looked at my m0n0wall install to see if it could
aggregate multiple WAN connection, but it cannot. pfSense, a fork of
m0n0wall, *CAN*, on the other hand, do this out of the
On Dec 26, 2006, at 11:30, Bruce Dawson wrote:
(using a router - preferably a Linksys running OpenWRT
or somesuch)?
These guys appear to box up a linux router for said purpose:
http://www.peplink.com/productsSpec.php?productName=balance
These are also frequently mentioned:
On 12/26/06, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although it would make sense that she would use one modem, and I the
other; it stops making sense when you consider the various (shared)
printers, file servers and other servers on our LAN that we need access
to in our daily tasks.
The
- Original Message -
From: Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: Traffic shaping/aggregating
On 12/26/06, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although it would make sense that she would use one modem
On 12/26/06, hewitt_tech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about using the LinkSys RV042/82 series router which has dual wide area
network connections and can do load balancing?
How about cutting some text when quoting a message? ;-) (Your
2-line reply quoted 50 lines of original.)
Netiquette
Jared Watkins wrote:
Is anyone on the list familiar with the use of the tc command for
traffic shaping?
I'm trying to set up a two tiered set of queues... and it's giving me
'Invalid argument' errors when I'm almost certain the syntax is
right...
I've encountered the same problem. Since it was
17 matches
Mail list logo
