On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 15:07 +0200, Martin Man wrote:
Nico Sabbi wrote:
what I'd really like to have in some more documentation, especially
guides on how to package ON stuff (not all of it is available in Nexenta,
including pieces that are CDDL such as the xsvc driver, BTW why?)
so
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 13:37 +0800, Aubrey Li wrote:
I really want to make nexenta to be a development platform.
So, besides Sun Studio, I'd like to the following package are added.
1) ON source tools: Mercurial
done (in unstable now)
2) ON Specific Build Tools: SUNWonbld.i386.tar.bz2
Nexenta Core Platform (NexentaCP) RC3 is available at:
http://www.nexenta.org
Release highlights:
* OpenSolaris build 80+ (non-debug) + critical fixes from b81-b83 [1]:
- critical fixes for native CIFS server
- critical fixes for ZFS
- critical bug fixes for SATA and networking
apt-get install sunwxsvc
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 16:30 +0100, Nico Sabbi wrote:
On Tuesday 29 January 2008 15:26:04 Aubrey Li wrote:
On nexenta, xsvc driver is missing.
So some solaris special applications failed due to no /dev/xsvc.
Is it intended?
Why?
-Aubrey
I asked the same
I assume you already subscribed to nexenta-changes@ mailing list?
You should see your upload there, and some of FTP-masters will examine
it and accept it - you should see accept or reject.
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 23:39 +0800, Aubrey Li wrote:
I uploaded a new package, and wonder how to track the
apt-get install nexenta-builder
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 19:39 +0530, Harshavardhana wrote:
Hi Nexeanta Group,
I wanted to know is there a way that i can build a custom
distribution like nexenta with minimal applications, in my case
1. Bash prompt.
2. OpenSolaris kernel.
3.
I'm sorry you have such an impression - but, hey, this is open source
stuff - don't complain and fix it yourself if you can. Remember, most
of Nexenta developers doing this work for free at their free time.
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 14:51 +0200, Marcus Sundman wrote:
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED
. This means that link aggregates on
the x4100 don't work where there are two nge interfaces and two e1000g
interfaces. This seems to affect the latest Sol10U4 patches and the
latest Nexenta testing base.
-Tim
Erast Benson wrote:
Guys,
I just uploaded 1.0.1-test3 for your testing
,
-Tim
Erast Benson wrote:
Thanks for the information!
By any chance, do you have bug number for this? Could you look it up if
fix is already in?
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 13:52 -0700, Tim Spriggs wrote:
Hi Erast,
There is a new bug in the e1000g driver that does not allow
For those who interested in creating SMF services for Debian packages,
here is nice web GUI, which should generate initial SMF .xml file:
http://es.opensolaris.org/easySMF/
Examples of SMFed services in Nexenta are rsync, apache2, etc. We are
using dh_installsmf deb helper and the process pretty
Daniel,
yes, this is the problem. It should return 0 on success.
Could you put 'echo' in the code and see which line causing this? We
would then could come up with the fix.
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 14:55 +0100, Daniel Llewellyn wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Erast Benson
http://hg.genunix.org/onnv-gate.hg/rev/1a2a7cfb9f26
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 00:09 +0200, Nico Sabbi wrote:
Il Wednesday 28 May 2008 19:43:19 Erast Benson ha scritto:
Hi Guys,
just uploaded ZFS write-throttle fix into unstable. Give it a try!
can you explain what this fix does, please
Dear NexentaOS Developers and Users!
Starting this Saturday, we are inviting all Debian/Nexenta and
OpenSolaris developers and users to participate in our first Hackathon
event.
Hackathon starts on this Saturday 05/31/2008 and continues during first
week of June. Development coordinated at
This is to announce 1.0.1-test4 (elatte NCP 1.x branch) release.
Main fixes and changes:
* 100+ new packages in elatte-testing repository
* LSI mega_sas driver for LSI SAS/SATA HBAs
* IBM ServeRAID FreeBSD ported ips driver for 4x,5x,6x series HBAs
* ZFS write-throttle fixes from b87 and b91
In this case, we probably need to split unison package. Following NCP
policy here to accept console-only/daemon-only/library-only packages...
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 04:14 +0300, Marcus Sundman wrote:
Leonardo Rodrigues de Mello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am working at porting unison debian
Hi,
A lot of fun these days and a lot of achievements!
June's Hackathon-in-progress status:
* Debian tools such as: devscripts, dpkg, apt, debarchiver, etc all
ported
* compiled bunch of NCP 2.0 packages (gcc prerequisites)
* newisys-nas.stanford.edu
I think that you could substitute some of the packages from
Elatte/Dapper. (NCP 1.0).
Two apt-get/dpkg options could be especially helpful here:
apt-get --reinstall install ...
dpkg --force-all ...
But long term - we need to add missing packages to the NCP 2.0
repository..
On Tue, 2008-08-12
On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 20:00 +0530, Anil Gulecha wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another way is to use dpkg-divert - but in this case its a bug.
charset.alias must be shipped with libiconv library only.
I hung around at #elinks, and turns out
dput says: please install package locally, so to verify that it
installs cleanly before uploading it.
Have you tried this yet?
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 22:42 +0530, Anil Gulecha wrote:
Hi,
I'm loading 4 packages, of which 2 conflict with each other. (thus i
cannot install them both at the same
If nothing else, dput is a python script you could temporarily disable
check - or better extend it with an option which will do so.
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 23:48 +0530, Anil Gulecha wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dput says: please install package
PM, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 23:48 +0530, Anil Gulecha wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dput says: please install package locally, so to verify that it
installs cleanly before uploading it.
Have you
Usually there should be a way to disable usage of fakeroot. But I could
confirm that the version of fakeroot (binary) available on SchiliX ftp
worked fine for me..
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 15:27 +0530, Anil Gulecha wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Anil Gulecha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I do not remember, I think it was part of SchiliX ISO..
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 10:06 +0530, Anil Gulecha wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Usually there should be a way to disable usage of fakeroot. But I could
confirm that the version of fakeroot
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 03:37 -0700, Michael Bushey wrote:
I was thinking of porting my favourite editor XEmacs...
I'm a vi guy, but this is exactly what Nexenta needs, a complete (ie
comparable to Ubuntu or Debian) repository.
It seems that focused push works best for Nexenta development.
We need to debug why GLIB-linked application core dumps...
Do we have any other glib-linked packages uploaded and working?
On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 20:59 +0530, Anil Gulecha wrote:
Hi,
I'm tryign to build the gtk2.0 package for hardy.. and configure fails with
..
checking for pkg-config...
Seems like include path for GLIB is not properly set. glib.h not found
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 16:20 +0530, Anil Gulecha wrote:
The core dump is now done away with.. i compiled glib2.16.4 removing
the -lgthread flag.
configure still fails at
configure:24210: checking for extra flags for
apt-get install lib64gcc1
or similar should help..
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 13:52 +0530, Anil Gulecha wrote:
Hi,
I was building the package libnspr4-dev, when make failed with an
incompatible -lgcc. what does this mean and any suggested
workarounds?
Regards
Anil
[snip]
dh_testdir
Good one.
It uses all the right tools - which is most critical here.
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 23:25 +0530, Anil Gulecha wrote:
hi,
I've written a simple build script to automatically go though the
building steps for a package. In the best case, where no change is
required to a upstream
Hi All,
Hackaton is still in progress!
Here goes short history of events so far:
* NexentaCore 2.0 Alpha2 first 'testing' ISO available - ON b97/b98
based. People reported successful installations, likely we will have
official Alpha2 next week, as usual, upgradable with power of Debian
tools -
this usually happens when you trying to access APT repo in the middle of
uploads. Just wait couple minutes and try again.
On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 08:28 +0530, Anil Gulecha wrote:
Hi,
ONe of the build dependencies for a package to be installed is
python-gobject .. but
[EMAIL
Just talked to Ubuntu developers on #ubuntu-devel. Added section to
http://www.nexenta.org/os/NexentaRepositoryPolicyMain with suggestions.
___
gnusol-devel mailing list
gnusol-devel@lists.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-devel
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 13:03 +0530, Anil Gulecha wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Anil Gulecha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've been building various aspell packages. Most package fine into
debs, but almost all have the below issue when installing ( I've
uploaded the debs
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 10:11 -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
* A LOT of source packages are missing (most of the sunw*)
Will be uploading this this one in 2-3 weeks. This should not be a
problem at least. But I'd like to make sure that it is build-able on
NCP, even with some help of native
Hi David,
Great work!
Yes, such port makes sense and solves some of the issues (mostly GNU
libc portability) but unfortunately creates new issues, which I'm sure,
could be worked out and soon we should have more or less working first
ISO available with support for this new exciting architecture!
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:55 AM, Joerg Schilling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, such port makes sense and solves some of the issues (mostly GNU
libc portability) but unfortunately creates new issues, which I'm sure,
could
to get things like the wifi tools for
FreeBSD working. I'm not saying that adapting glibc is a bad thing,
but we need to figure out if we really want to go down this path.
Michael
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. And in addition to autotools
2008-10-23
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:40:10 -0700
From: Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: nexenta-on package uploaded
To: gnusol-devel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 10:52 +0530, Anil Gulecha wrote:
Hi,
I think I'm running into a parsing bug with dh_installsmf with the
package postgresql-8.3.. the manifest seems fine and defines a section
as follows..
-snip manifest-
service_bundle type='manifest'
Dear Nexenta Developers,
I just uploaded b102 bits (yes with 6771840 backout) into Hardy unstable
and managed to upgrade couple of Alpha2 environments. So far so good and
I'd like to give you a green light for upgrades of your dev.
environments.
As usual, if something goes wrong, use apt-clone
). No problems upgrading and rebooting. What was
the fix?
Thomas
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I think it should be fixed now. Could you please try to rollback
this upgrade and try again?
On Sun, 2008-11-23 at 21:18 -0500, Thomas Garner wrote
what's the output of zfs mount command?
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 22:28 -0800, Michael Bushey wrote:
I'm running SunOS random 5.11 NexentaOS_20081118 i86pc i386 i86pc
Solaris - I guess that's 103b, I don't know how to tell.
# apt-clone dist-upgrade
This operation will upgrade your system
That was me - I accidentally uploaded the package without source. I'm
planning to push it tonight/tomorrow with more CIFS/AD fixes included.
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 12:24 +0100, C. Bergström wrote:
Hi guys..
I'm trying to find the latest nexenta-on source package.. Can you push
that somewhere
you might need to verify that zpool / zfs versions of your checkpoint(s)
are all the latest:
zpool get version syspool = v10
zfs get -r version syspool = v3
However, keep in mind that if you upgrade to v10, you will not be able
to load previous checkpoint with b85.
Another possible reason is
This been fixed in b104 I believe
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 17:28 -0500, Thomas Garner wrote:
I wasn't seeing them at boot, but after upgrading to b102, I saw
spontaneous reboots, often several times a day. It was bad enough
that I reverted to b85.
Dec 2 04:00:11 filer0
BTW, 9300 packages imported now. 3700 missing...
On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 10:27 -0500, Tim Spriggs wrote:
I think we need to wait and see what happens when main is enabled for
builds before we can judge what will happen ultimately with depends.
Right. This make sense to fix prior to addressing
Is top ported to OpenSolaris yet? I'd like to see zone extensions in it
too... Also is anybody interested in porting GNU chmod and ls utilities
to work with ZFS ACL's ?
Such development, if successful, would somewhat close the gap between
SUN / GNU tools and make everybody happy, I think..
On
Yes, I did some modifications to dialog, so it works better with Nexenta
installer. I recommend to upload original Elatte dialog package - it is
tested and it is stable.
On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 12:52 -0800, Jason Upton wrote:
Thanks for the feedback Tim.
I've been able to build a CD image now
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 20:07 +0100, Mario-Lorenz wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on some of the mail-related packages, and found some issues
that I would like to ask which the better way for a fix would be.
a) fetchmail doesnt build because it can not find krb5-config.
It can not find it because
Jason,
just remove of conflicting add_drv PCI ID entry from
myamanet-sfe/debian/postinst would do, I think.
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 07:57 -0800, Jason Upton wrote:
I'd like to remove the conflict between sunwsfe and myamanet-sfe
packages by renaming the myamanet-sfe version of the driver (they
Mario,
you are absolutely right. The implementation of the kerberos which comes
with ON bits tightly integrated with NFS and CIFS services, provides pam
module, and actively maintained by opensolaris community. We should have
it installed and offered by default.
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 16:46
You could track changes to krb5 here:
http://hg.genunix.org/onnv-gate.hg/log?rev=krb5
but this is only for files matching krb5 phrase. In reality it is much
more differences then the above link showing.
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 09:18 +0100, Fredriksson, Ulf wrote:
you are absolutely right. The
51 matches
Mail list logo
