Here's Elsevier's latest revision of the wording of its author rights
agreement stating what rights Elsevier authors retain for their Accepted
Author Manuscript
[AAM]http://www.elsevier.com/journal-authors/author-rights-and-responsibilities?a=105167#accepted-author-manuscript
.
*Elsevier believes
With all respect, Stevan, I am not sure it is worth answering publishers'
policy tricks with deposit hacks. The core question is: does Elsevier fulfills,
by making such statements, its duties as service provider in the domain of
scholarly communication. If not, we, as institutions, have to be
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Laurent Romary laurent.rom...@inria.frwrote:
With all respect, Stevan, I am not sure it is worth answering publishers'
policy tricks with deposit hacks. The core question is: does Elsevier
fulfills, by making such statements, its duties as service provider in
It is good that Stevan keeps an eye on publisher policies for us, and it is
also good that Peter reminds us that universities do have the power to say no
to publishers. Stevan is correct that the distinction Elsevier and other
publishers attempt to draw between mandated and non-mandated
Thanks Fred,
At one level it is true that we get the contracts we deserve, but only if
the issues are known. And the #scholarlypoor does not get the contracts it
deserves.
Peter's complaint that libraries do not challenge use or re-use clauses
in contracts is not absolutely true,
I give two
We have tried an experiment in bimodal publishing, sending a narrative to a
conventional publisher and the associated data to a data publisher. The latter
can then be transcluded into the former, but both have individual doi
assignments and can be treated quite separately.
Finding the debate
Friend, Fred writes
I am sorry to be cynical, but the academic community gets the
contracts it deserves. We have to learn to say no and really mean
it.
Say no to what? And how will you make sure what you say is matched
by what you do?
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel
As a reminder, here is how at least some of us academics are saying no to
Elsevier, the Cost of Knowledge boycott:
http://thecostofknowledge.com/
Signing on to and then acting on the San Francisco Declaration on Research
Assessment is a good step to push back against the impact factor game
Heather Morrison writes
As a reminder, here is how at least some of us academics are saying
no to Elsevier, the Cost of Knowledge boycott:
http://thecostofknowledge.com/
Individual academics have little incentives to carry out a threat
like this. And this is specific to Elsevier when
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Laurent Romary laurent.rom...@inria.frwrote:
With all respect, Stevan, I am not sure it is worth answering publishers'
policy tricks with deposit hacks. The core question is: does Elsevier
fulfill, by making such statements, its duties as service provider in
10 matches
Mail list logo
