Hello,
we have a tool called AuDAO (http://audao.spoledge.com) which
generates
DAO layer (including DTO classes) for GAE.
The source is a XML configuration file. The result classes use low-
level
Datastore API. Transactions and entity groups are supported.
Static GQL queries are transformed into
GTalk seems to have fixed itself now.
On Jan 20, 9:37 pm, Hani Naguib haninag...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like I am not the only one with this problem!
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hi,
I'm a little confused about how can I authenticate on a application.
I see and use the user service provide by app engine, and it is all
ok.
I would like to use the service of piacasaweb, youtube, google friend
connect and other non google service like flickr (for example).
For use that
Ciao,
is there a way to change bean schema adding some fields without deleting
all previous entities of same kind?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Vincenzo
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send
i faced same problem. have u found out what is the reason?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
In my application, I have a fairly large object that has a complex
serialised object structure as a member:
@Basic
@Lob
@Column(nullable = false)
private ListFoo fooElements;
Now, I try to modify a member of fooElements like this:
fooElements.get(0).setSomething(...);
When I do this, the main
I have the same problem, even though my is already deployed.
On Jan 15, 5:39 pm, zoli altfatt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have also faced this issue. First you have to create the application
on the appengine.google.com
Then you can deploy the first version of the application.
It worked for
Hello all, I am interested in using app engine in my application witch
is using jingle, I have read about app engines xmpp support but would
I be able to use jingle? also if the official xmpp support doesn't
support jingle would I be able to use smack stack to do jingle? thanks
in advanced maxsap
How is your proxy servlet determining the URL of the request?
-- David P. Caldwell
http://www.inonit.com/
On Jan 20, 1:47 pm, Harry Monroe pablo.sole...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to write a proxy server in java.
It´s a very simple application that filters the requests to
Hello,
As I understand, the JDO/JPA implementation is based on DataNucleus
1.1.
But on the Datanucleus forums I got an answer 1.1 is not maintained.
2.0 is current (for a question which is not important now).
Does this mean that AppEngine will be soon upgraded to DataNucleus 2
as well?
Thanks
I recently got my hands dirty getting Spring Javaconfig working on
GAE. The lessons are summarized in the following blog post:
http://blog.xebia.com/2010/01/17/using-springs-java-configuration-on-google-app-engine/
Thought this might prove useful...
Andrew
--
You received this message because
Hi,
i would like to send UDP packets to the App Engine server. The server
should modify them and send them back to my box. When I'm trying to
code that in Java I want to use DatagramPacket and InetAddress, but
App Engine doesn't support those. What can I o to solve my problem?
Or if UDP packets
Is there a way to circumbent google app engine sdk to allow the usage
of classes that are not present in the GAE JRE white list? I know the
app that I would be building would not run in appspot, but at least in
my development server, I need to access a postgresql database
(java.net.socket.*) and
It was actually my fault, I was providing the wrong application name
to ./appcfg.py. It works now with the correct app.
On Jan 15, 5:39 pm, zoli altfatt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have also faced this issue. First you have to create the application
on the appengine.google.com
Then you can
Same problem here .. looks like XMPP is down on app engine.
On Jan 20, 8:09 pm, Hani Naguib haninag...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like xmpp messages to the application do not get received.
It can send xmpp and everything else seems fine.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Hi,
I have a similar issue with 1.3.0 however it arises when the types
are the same and not related to inheritance of any type.
The work around suggested doesn't seem to work. Is the workaround
valid for 1.3.0?
thx,
Conor
On Dec 4 2009, 9:52 pm, Max Ross (Google) maxr
+appeng...@google.com
Hello,
I read in the GWT docs that some support has been added to the RPC
implementation to support enhanced JDO/JPA classes. See Serializing
Enhanced Classes in
http://code.google.com/intl/hu-HU/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideServerCommunication.html#DevGuideSerializableTypes.
My question is:
Hi all,
I am an experienced .NET developer but new to JAVA and Eclipse. I am
currently experimenting with JAVA and the GAE with plans to start
making more use of the GAE since I really like what is offered (Google
keep up the good work ;)).
However I am running into a problem, I would like to
Hi there!
If you're learning Java, it's probably overkill to create 4 different
projects, even for different layers of the application. It's probably enough
to simply create different packages and sort through them that way.
For development, you can get away with putting the JAR files in your
See if the following link helps:
http://code.google.com/eclipse/docs/appengine_validation.html.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:08 AM, ivanceras ivance...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to circumbent google app engine sdk to allow the usage
of classes that are not present in the GAE JRE white list?
Ok, thanks for the answer.
The solution you describe was my alternative if this would not work.
Thanks!
On Jan 20, 11:00 pm, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
No, you won't be able to authenticate the second application once a user is
logged into the first. If you think about the
The .NET approach is different than the Java approach. It's unnecessary to
break this project up. I personally do not think you gain anything with this
approach other than additional complexity.
That being said, Eclipse is infinitely flexible. You can probably set it up
so that on a build, it
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Duong BaTien duong.bat...@gmail.com wrote:
While exploring list-property and merge-join from this talk
http://code.google.com/events/io/2009/sessions/BuildingScalableComplexApps.html
i concur with your value proposition.
Neat, I had missed that talk. Good
Hi Ikai,
Thanks again for the reply.
The thing is that I want the Service layer to be a facade library
which (potentially) can be used in several projects. I assumed it
would be useful to compile it into a separate JAR file so it can
easily be reused and I don't have to extract the packages
When I created new index it was building it hole day.
I thought it added all data to index as when I create index for small
number of entities then index is created much faster.
May be there is some bug when index is built and google may fix it.
Thanks John you helped a lot!
On Jan 19,
SimpleDS' api is closer than the others to what I want, but here's
what I don't like:
* Not enough use of generics. Key, Query, and PreparedQuery should
all be generified classes.
* Key should not be used as the id for a class. The class itself
identifies the Kind, so having a Key id carries
[java] 90% Deploying new version.
[java] 95% Will check again in 1 seconds
[java] 98% Will check again in 2 seconds
[java] 99% Will check again in 4 seconds
[java] 99% Will check again in 8 seconds
[java] 99% Will check again in 16 seconds
[java] 99% Will check
We're experiencing increased deployment latencies at the moment. This
should be resolved shortly.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Andrei gml...@gmail.com wrote:
[java] 90% Deploying new version.
[java] 95% Will check again in 1 seconds
[java] 98% Will check again in 2 seconds
Thanks
I am getting this now
Too Many Versions (403)
The application already has the maximum number of versions.
I'll try again soon
On Jan 21, 5:10 pm, Don Schwarz schwa...@google.com wrote:
We're experiencing increased deployment latencies at the moment. This
should be resolved shortly.
This is so far the best Low-Level API wrapper i can find.
Thanks for your great work.
Using this library, I've managed to shorten the cold start time of my
servlets from 4s to 1.5s, and normal request from 300ms to 150ms
So happy not to mess around JDO anymore. :D
--
You received this message
hi! I am having problems similar to
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/browse_thread/thread/4ab4567d36043241
Whenever I try to deploy, I get
Unable to update:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Version not ready.
at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.AppVersionUpload.commit
I get an InvocationTargetException the first time I query the
datastore after starting the dev server.
My app works fine, but I feel like the exception slows down the
startup time and is also probably a bad thing.
My query is simple its just:
Query q = pm.newQuery(Question.class);
ListQuestion
I'm in this boat too, except I'm not getting the too many versions
message (yet).
On Jan 21, 5:07 pm, Andrei gml...@gmail.com wrote:
[java] 90% Deploying new version.
[java] 95% Will check again in 1 seconds
[java] 98% Will check again in 2 seconds
[java] 99% Will check
Hi Maurits,
I've achieved what you're looking for, but it wasn't easy. If anyone
has a better solution, I'm all ears.
First of all, to do it manually, you can Right-click any project in
Eclipse and Export it to a JAR file - which can then be saved in your
GAE lib/ folder. But, this has to be
interestingly enough I get essentially the same exception when calling
into the TaskQueue API ...
I 01-21 02:44PM 41.437
com.google.appengine.repackaged.com.google.common.base.FinalizableReferenceQueue
$SystemLoader loadFinalizer: Not allowed to access system class
loader.
I 01-21 02:44PM 41.455
mine uploaded fine now
On Jan 21, 5:35 pm, Max Afonov m...@bumnetworks.com wrote:
I'm in this boat too, except I'm not getting the too many versions
message (yet).
On Jan 21, 5:07 pm, Andrei gml...@gmail.com wrote:
[java] 90% Deploying new version.
[java] 95% Will check again
On 22 Jan, 00:26, datanucleus andy_jeffer...@yahoo.com wrote:
Shouldn't make the slightest bit of difference. GAE/J ought to replace
that List with a wrapper that intercepts update operations. It hasn't
done
that.http://code.google.com/p/datanucleus-appengine/issues/detail?id=144c...
Thanks
Can you please elaborate on instrumenting via classloaders? Do you
mean JSR-163?
On Jan 20, 3:08 pm, Toby Reyelts to...@google.com wrote:
There are no immediate plans for this. Is there something that prevents you
from instrumenting via ClassLoaders?
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Kartik
No, I just meant that you could, for example, write a custom ClassLoader
that instruments bytecode before it loads it.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Kartik kart...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you please elaborate on instrumenting via classloaders? Do you
mean JSR-163?
On Jan 20, 3:08 pm, Toby
is this problem caused by gae bug? or application bug? found solution
yet?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group,
Tapestry 5.1 and 5.2-SNAPSHOT are now compatible w/ GAE, since the
javx.xml.stream API was whitelisted , sample apps are at
http://tapestry-test.appspot.com/ or http://ping-service.appspot.com/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for
The first sentence here is very clear about how calling makePersistent
on an object with relationships automatically saves all the new or
modified related objects:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/relationships.html#Relationships_Entity_Groups_and_Transactions
I've read that
These exceptions are a normal part of startup and logged at the INFO
level for that reason. They are just slightly annoying but harmless
so ignore them.
On 22 Jan 2010, at 05:56, Larry Cable wrote:
interestingly enough I get essentially the same exception when calling
into the TaskQueue
Hello Miguel,
Thanks for the link. Just a quick question here if you have tried it.
That this mean if I exclude the validation, my code will now be able
to use the blacklisted classes?
Thanks,
ivanceras
On Jan 22, 3:51 am, Miguel Méndez mmen...@google.com wrote:
See if the following link
Your workarund, to use JDOHelper would be what I need, but I'm not
using JDO. I'm using JPA. Is there a similar workaround there?
Doesn't make any difference either. JPA (in DataNucleus) uses JDO
enhancement, and so marking the field as dirty using a JDO helper
method would do the same under
Hi Jake,
Thank you very much for your reply, this is exactly what I was looking
for. And since I am also using on MacOS it should be really easy to
setup with the information you gave ;).
Cheers, Maurits
On Jan 21, 8:03 pm, Jake jbrooko...@cast.org wrote:
Hi Maurits,
I've achieved what
On Jan 22, 2:16 pm, datanucleus andy_jeffer...@yahoo.com wrote:
Your workarund, to use JDOHelper would be what I need, but I'm not
using JDO. I'm using JPA. Is there a similar workaround there?
Doesn't make any difference either. JPA (in DataNucleus) uses JDO
enhancement, and so marking
JDO does not do this too. I think it is a rather annoying bug.
Serializing does not work (use that too myself) and just modifing an
element does not work too, as your program clearly found out. Still
waiting for a fix though...
On Jan 22, 12:50 am, Elias Mårtenson loke...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22
Since 10 hours I see no more errors! I'm very happy! :)))
(now: 2010-01-22 7:40 utc)
I haven't changed anything and no deploy.
Google Team, what have you done?
FYI, a couple of screenshot of the dashboard graph:
http://gs.fhtino.it/download/GAE2_no_more_error1.png?attredirects=0
49 matches
Mail list logo
