Hi Jeff, *,
I was quite surprised fo find out that my messages don't make it to
the gossip list, despite I'm receiving all the mails from others.
Turns out that the gossip list doesn't look for from, but the real
sender (i.e. you cannot send from alternate addresses setup in gmail,
but have to
Hi Jeff, *,
I was quite surprised fo find out that my messages don't make it to
the gossip list, despite I'm receiving all the mails from others.
Turns out that the gossip list doesn't look for from, but the real
sender (i.e. you cannot send from alternate addresses setup in gmail,
but have to
Hi Jeff, *,
I was trying to add the http://go.mai-archive.com/hash URLs for a
mailing list, and am now facing problem, that some messages are not
reachable using those computed URLs.
While having a closer look (on that small dataset), the problematic
messages cannot be found by message-ID
Hi Jeff,
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Jeff Breidenbach j...@jab.org wrote:
You found a bug. In The Mail Archive's hash calculation, there is an
incorrect urlib.unquote run on the message id. This is escaping the minus
sign, and therefore calculating based on an incorrect message id.
Ah,
Hi Friedrich, *,
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier
damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de wrote:
Jeff Breidenbach schrieb:
[..]
http://www.mhonarc.org/MHonArc/doc/resources/addressmodifycode.html
AddressModifyCode
$orig_address = $_;
$address = lc($orig_address);
if
Hi Friedrich, *;
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier
damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de wrote:
long time no see .. ;o))
:-)
Christian Lohmaier schrieb:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier
[...]
in this case - I fear AddressModifyCode isn't the right thing
Hi *,
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier
damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de wrote:
Hi Jeff, *,
Jeff Breidenbach schrieb:
((?:cid:)?|(?:(?:http://(?:www\.)?)?mail-archive\.com/)?)($AddrExp)
Tested and live. Thanks guys.
Thanks a lot!
The initial posting's broken link
Hi *,
what I always liked about mail-archive.com was its powerful search,
but it seems it has been replaced by a google search, that doesn't
support the lucene parameters anymore.
The first change to the worse since I've been using mail-archive.com
So if this is a permanent change (the message
Hi Jeff,
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Jeff Breidenbach j...@jab.org wrote:
Okay, found the bug.
Great :-) thanks for sharing the reason.
[...] I have hopefully corrected the
code, so there should be good data going forward.
yes, confirmed. Works again for new messages.
Can you remind
Hi Jeff, *,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Ralph Corderoy ra...@inputplus.co.uk wrote:
http://www.maxdesign.com.au/jobs/318-mail-archive/38.htm
Not much of a friend of displaying the ads within the message as if
the poster had added the image (but that's not different compared to
as it is
Hi Jeff, *,
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Jeff Marshall marsh...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
We've been finding and fixing bugs with the new design the last few weeks
but please alert us to all the edge cases we've neglected to find ourselves!
Feedback and bug reports are desired.
I like the
Hi Jeff, *,
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Jeff Breidenbach j...@jab.org wrote:
I've now had some time to spruce up the search feature. Amazing what
progress Lucene has made in the last few years. Search is slightly
faster now, there is less code on our end, and I found and fixed a couple of
Hi *,
seems that some indexing got stuck for the aforementioned list
http://www.mail-archive.com/board-discuss@documentfoundation.org/maillist.html
I confirmed that arch...@mail-archive.com is still subscribed, and
mail is sent and accepted:
e.g. most recent mail:
Jun 30 10:14:41 bilbo2
13 matches
Mail list logo
