-
From: Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:37 PM
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] More DINUM problems
Thanks Skip,
I also have gotten this working. For complex reasons,
my install scripter was adding the record, and then
trying
, November 23, 2004 5:37 PM
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] More DINUM problems
Thanks Skip,
I also have gotten this working. For complex reasons,
my install scripter was adding the record, and then
trying to overwrite it a second time. It working now.
I think you cheated a bit bel
the already
existing VistA options
that accomplish that task or write a script to those
options?
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:37 PM
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] More DINUM problems
Thanks
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:37 PM
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] More DINUM problems
Thanks Skip,
I also have gotten this working. For complex
reasons,
my install scripter was adding the record, and
then
trying to overwrite it a second time
of an existing user to a new role, for example, changing a resident to an
attending physician.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] More DINUM problems
Steven,
Thanks
Nancy,
Thanks for your post. I don't think that the FILE^DIE
and UPDATER^DIE will balk as partial matches. In
other words, if I tell it XUPROG, it does not get
confused with XUPROGMODE. I know that interactive
fileman will ask about this, but I have already used
it for looking up menu options,
There's actually a flag to control this behavior. If you look at the
documentation for FIND^DIC, you'll find the following description for
the O (for Only) flag:
Only find exact matches if possible. The Finder first searches for
exact matches on the requested Index(es); if any are found, it
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg
Woodhouse
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 12:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] More DINUM problems
There's actually a flag to control this behavior. If you look
: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 12:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] More DINUM problems
There's actually a flag to control this behavior. If
you look at the
documentation for FIND^DIC, you'll find the
following description for
the O (for Only) flag:
Only find exact
I am hitting a DINUM error message again that I don't
understand. I know that a DINUMed error is when a
user is trying to add multiple records when there is
supposed to be only one entry.
But I am getting this when I try to add keys to a
user. There are supposed to be multiple entries here,
so
Wait... by calling UPDATE with the internal value for the .01 field,
you won't be performing the .01 field's input transform that created
DINUM. So, it looks like you have to use the inbound IEN array to
specify a sub-file record number for the new record that is the same
value as the .01
Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
Greg,
Thanks for your reply.
So in my install script, I have a long list of keys
that I want to ensure that a given user has. Am I
getting this DINUM error because I am trying to add a
key that already exists for the user, or because the
FILE^DIE function can't
Greg,
Thanks for your reply.
So in my install script, I have a long list of keys
that I want to ensure that a given user has. Am I
getting this DINUM error because I am trying to add a
key that already exists for the user, or because the
FILE^DIE function can't handle DINUM entries?
How else
Could this be the issue?
XUPROG and XUPROGMODE both start the same, so if you put that you want to give
someone the XUPROG key, it will want to know if it is XUPROG or XUPROGMODE
you are talking about. So maybe you are tapping into something designed to
prevent confusion about that sort of
Sorry for my earlier post. I saw later that it was all sorted out and I am
way off base.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] More DINUM problems
Date: Monday 22 November 2004 10:37 pm
From: Nancy E. Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could
15 matches
Mail list logo
