Actually, no. Binary trees are something quite different (and
generally more familiar).
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nothing is as powerful than an idea
whose time has come.
-- Victor Hugo
On Aug 23, 2005, at 6:05 PM, Nancy Anthracite wrote:
B, I believe, is for Binary.
On
On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 14:19 -0500, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
[KSB] ...snip...
I'll check with Bhaskar whether or not there is any risk in storing
non-printable characters in a global. I did some testing and filled
a
global with $char(0) and it didn't seem to loose them, or cause the
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Re: Is $$GTF~%ZISH() binary friendly?
On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 14:19 -0500, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
[KSB] ...snip...
I'll check with Bhaskar whether or not there is any risk in
storing
non-printable characters in a global. I did some testing and
filled
, 2005 2:39 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Re: Is $$GTF~%ZISH() binary friendly?
On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 14:19 -0500, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
[KSB] ...snip...
I'll check with Bhaskar whether or not there is any risk in
storing
Probably not of much value to ask unless you are a GT.M internals
developer - details are in the source code. As a gross simplification
(along the lines of saying that living things are made up of cells),
GT.M stores the length and actual value of each string. But there are
all sorts of
Sowinski, Richard J. wrote:
What I see happen when you have control characters in Globals is that when
you try to display the global, it reeks havoc with your screen.
This is an issue with your display device and user interface (or lack of one)
when working
with roll-and-scroll on dumb
I think Kevin was asking whether or not strings are null terminated.
I know nothing about the GT.M source, but as a general sort answer:
Databases don't typically store data in a packed format (like the
run-time heap), but instead storage is allocated in fixed size
chunks, which are then
OK. Thanks. I had always thought that B-Tree ment Binary tree.
But quick search turned on wikipedia turned up this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-tree
The B-tree's creator, Rudolf Bayer, has not explained what the B
stands for. The most common belief is that B stands for balanced, as
all
Sorry for bad info. That is what I thought my husband told me it meant, but I
just looked it up in his Algorithms book by Sedgewick, and it says
something very similar to what the wikipedia had to say.
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 06:25 pm, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
OK. Thanks. I had always
-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Hardhats-members] Re: Is $$GTF~%ZISH() binary friendly?
OK. Thanks. I had always thought that B-Tree ment Binary tree.
But quick search turned on wikipedia turned up this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-tree
The B-tree's creator, Rudolf Bayer
On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 14:19 -0500, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
[KSB] ...snip...
I'll check with Bhaskar whether or not there is any risk in storing
non-printable characters in a global. I did some testing and filled
a
global with $char(0) and it didn't seem to loose them, or cause the
B, I believe, is for Binary.
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 06:11 pm, Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
I think Kevin was asking whether or not strings are null terminated.
I know nothing about the GT.M source, but as a general sort answer:
Databases don't typically store data in a packed format (like the
-tree is
easier to walk sequentially than having to do a tree climb.
Chris
.
- Original Message -
From: Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Re: Is $$GTF~%ZISH() binary friendly
Here is the code. I will also attach it incase wrapping ruins it here...
;TMG BIN --GBL FUNCTION
;Kevin Toppenberg MD
;GNU General Public License (GPL) applies
;8-20-2005
;===
; API -- Public Functions.
1-2 or 2-1
The star reads are eating your lunch. This will be much faster.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 5:53 AM
Subject: [Hardhats-members] Re: Is $$GTF~%ZISH() binary friendly?
Here is the code. I
all the support contracts in
place.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 9:05 AM
Subject: [Hardhats-members] Re: Is $$GTF~%ZISH() binary friendly?
A more fundamental question is whether M globals are binary
Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 9:05 AM
Subject: [Hardhats-members] Re: Is $$GTF~%ZISH() binary friendly?
A more fundamental question is whether M globals are binary friendly?
I know that the underlying data is stored as strings. So would
: Sunday, August 21, 2005 11:22 AM
Subject: [Hardhats-members] Re: Is $$GTF~%ZISH() binary friendly?
Chris,
I am having trouble getting a buffered read to work.
GTMset path=/tmp/
GTMset fname=killthis
GTMdo OPEN^%ZISH(Handle,path,fname,R)
GTMw POP
0
GTMF Q:($ZEOF) U IO:(NOTERMINATOR) R X#255:5
18 matches
Mail list logo
