regards,
Alexei Fedotov,
Intel Middleware Products Division
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 9:58 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [drlvm][unit tests] the goal is to achieve 100
-
From: Fedotov, Alexei A
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 6:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [drlvm][unit tests] the goal is to achieve 100%
pass
rate
Geir,
I reviewed the patches for HARMONY-1816 (non-daemon thread
counting
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [drlvm][unit tests] the goal is to achieve 100% pass rate
Geir,
I reviewed the patches for HARMONY-1816 (non-daemon thread counting is
done
more accurately) and for HARMONY-1823 - the fix is to clean patches are
good.
I believe the patches worth to be committed: I've tried
]
Cc: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [drlvm][unit tests] the goal is to achieve 100% pass rate
Geir,
I reviewed the patches for HARMONY-1816 (non-daemon thread counting is
done
more accurately) and for HARMONY-1823 - the fix is to clean patches are
good.
I believe
,
Intel Middleware Products Division
-Original Message-
From: Fedotov, Alexei A
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 6:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [drlvm][unit tests] the goal is to achieve 100% pass
rate
Geir,
I reviewed
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [drlvm][unit tests] the goal is to achieve 100% pass
rate
Geir,
I reviewed the patches for HARMONY-1816 (non-daemon thread counting
is
done
more accurately) and for HARMONY-1823 - the fix
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [drlvm][unit tests] the goal is to achieve 100% pass
rate
Geir,
I reviewed the patches for HARMONY-1816 (non-daemon thread counting
is
done
more accurately) and for HARMONY-1823 - the fix is to clean patches
are
good.
I believe the patches worth
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [drlvm][unit tests] the goal is to achieve 100% pass rate
great work - we'll get those applied ASAP.
Elena Semukhina wrote:
Yesterday I tried the following patches:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1592
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1816
http
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [drlvm][unit tests] the goal is to achieve 100% pass rate
Geir,
I reviewed the patches for HARMONY-1816 (non-daemon thread counting is
done
more accurately) and for HARMONY-1823 - the fix is to clean patches are
good.
I believe the patches worth to be committed
Yesterday I tried the following patches:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1592
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1816
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1823
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1741
They work fine. The first three patches restore
great work - we'll get those applied ASAP.
Elena Semukhina wrote:
Yesterday I tried the following patches:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1592
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1816
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1823
2006/10/11, Elena Semukhina [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello all,
I think that the goal of running classlib unit tests on DRLVM with 100% pass
rate could be worth to achieve.
+1
and we will have better pre-commit tests for VM
Actually today we have 99% (without
awt/swing) but still have about 30
Excellent. As appreciative as I am of J9, I can't wait to work in
all-Harmony code :)
geir
Elena Semukhina wrote:
Hello all,
I think that the goal of running classlib unit tests on DRLVM with 100%
pass
rate could be worth to achieve. Actually today we have 99% (without
awt/swing) but
13 matches
Mail list logo