Olivier dixit:
ok, I just tested myself on Windows and it seems that the RI ignores
environment variable changes, so I guess it's fine if we stick with what
we have in Harmony.
Now that I think about it, I remember someone complaining once on a Java
newsgroup that changing the CLASSPATH
Chris Gray wrote:
Olivier dixit:
ok, I just tested myself on Windows and it seems that the RI ignores
environment variable changes, so I guess it's fine if we
stick with what
we have in Harmony.
Now that I think about it, I remember someone complaining
once on a Java newsgroup that
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 13:22, Leo Simons wrote:
Licensing
-
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 07:38:36PM -0700, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
[what license should Sun use to open source java]
I'll bite: the MIT license.
+1, for all the reasons Stefano described. Along with the neccessary,
Does anybody know when will be implemented javax.rmi.PortableRemoteObject?
--
Igor V. Stolyarov
Intel Middleware Products Division
Hi,
The development on instrument is going to an end (I may still apply
a few patches of refine). And the tests for it do help a lot in finding
bugs and applying compatibility with RI, and special thanks to Stepan
and Support_Exec. :)
However, I still have a problem with Support_Exec,
It will be implemented when somebody will implement it :)
Do you need it for some specific reason? Application?
SY, Alexey
2006/8/24, Igor Stolyarov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does anybody know when will be implemented javax.rmi.PortableRemoteObject?
--
Igor V. Stolyarov
Intel Middleware Products
Yes, this class is necessary for work of Java Web Applications
Igor
2006/8/24, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It will be implemented when somebody will implement it :)
Do you need it for some specific reason? Application?
SY, Alexey
2006/8/24, Igor Stolyarov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does
On 8/23/06, Oliver Deakin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
Ive taken a quick look at your bug report, and at first glance the
Windows stack trace says:
Caused by: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: gl (Not found in
com.ibm.oti.vm.bootstrap.library.path)
at
I've tried to launch JBoss's bank example application on JBoss and didn't
can do it, because javax.rmi.PortableRemoteObject doesn't exist.
Igor.
2006/8/24, Igor Stolyarov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, this class is necessary for work of Java Web Applications
Igor
2006/8/24, Alexey Petrenko
[let's add prefix to the subject line]
Hi Vikram,
I've attached test.txt file containing all necessary java sources as well as test output on Harmony (actually, it's the same on RMI also).
Regards,
Mikhail
On 8/23/06, FaeLLe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Mikhail,Thanks for the reply !However
2006/8/24, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sian January wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thanks very much for looking at this. I have synchronised and tried
with a
new build and those two examples are working now. I will make sure I do
everything with a fresh build in future! Anyway it looks like
Wow - true DGC is really a cool thing!
And i agree with you that there is very few RMI DGC docs.
If your need some details about Harmony rmi dgc implementation - feel free
to ask.
Regards,
Mikhail
On 8/24/06, FaeLLe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes I should have the implementation completed by
Geir, all,
This is the first step to creating a site-wide CSS.
I've created a short version of the CSS file (see site.css) with the
major elements that a webpage might need. This is surely only a draft.
I'll need to work a bit more on table elements and also import
additional styles from
Hello All,
I'm investigating the possibilities of migrating Harmony tests from
JUnit/Directory layout to TestNG while reviewing all the related thread
in mailing list. And I will try to answer the open issues. To make
things simple, I will post the issues one by one. ;-)
Question: How to
On 8/24/06, Miguel Montes wrote:
Thanks Stepan. So, it should be
BDTD ::= SEQUENCE {
name UTF8String,
entity SET OF HTMLEntity,
element SET OF HTMLElement
}
HTMLEntity ::= SEQUENCE {
name UTF8String,
value INTEGER,
general [0] IMPLICIT BOOLEAN DEFAULT
Richard Liang wrote:
Hello All,
I'm investigating the possibilities of migrating Harmony tests from
JUnit/Directory layout to TestNG while reviewing all the related
thread in mailing list. And I will try to answer the open issues. To
make things simple, I will post the issues one by one. ;-)
Vladimir Gorr wrote:
On 8/23/06, Oliver Deakin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
Ive taken a quick look at your bug report, and at first glance the
Windows stack trace says:
Caused by: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: gl (Not found in
com.ibm.oti.vm.bootstrap.library.path)
at
On 24 August 2006 at 13:11, Igor Stolyarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried to launch JBoss's bank example application on JBoss and didn't
can do it, because javax.rmi.PortableRemoteObject doesn't exist.
FYI: It's also one of the three remaining classes which are required to
run Apache
Jimmy, Jing Lv wrote:
Hi,
The development on instrument is going to an end (I may still
apply a few patches of refine). And the tests for it do help a lot in
finding bugs and applying compatibility with RI, and special thanks to
Stepan and Support_Exec. :)
However, I still have a
Oliver,
Please take a look at a HARMONY-1243 patch. I fixed all bugs noticed
and made parsing a bit more robust. Also, added a define for
org.apache.harmony.boot.class.path name to vmi.h - to enforce that
there is 2-sided contract for this property.
I still think that some of those functions
It might also make sense to design in a write barrier verifier. The
concept is to verify that all the old-to-young pointers are properly
handled. One way of doing this is to force a full heap mark. Then
compare the full heap mark's old-to-young pointers to what the write
barrier mechanism
Weldon, I have some information for this case.
There bit layout was the following before new thread manager integration:
object info word contains:
0 bit - available for GC
1-6 bits - object hashcode
7 bit - contention bit unused by TM, but used by GC_V4
8-31 bits - other thread manager's data
Is everything OK with JIRA notifications?
I have not received notifications today...
SY, Alexey
--
Alexey A. Petrenko
Intel Middleware Products Division
-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To
On 24 August 2006 at 13:58, Oliver Deakin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
Hello All,
I'm investigating the possibilities of migrating Harmony tests from
JUnit/Directory layout to TestNG while reviewing all the related
thread in mailing list. And I will try to answer the
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 24 August 2006 at 13:58, Oliver Deakin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
Hello All,
I'm investigating the possibilities of migrating Harmony tests from
JUnit/Directory layout to TestNG while reviewing all the related
thread in mailing list. And I
On 8/24/06, Ivan Volosyuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Weldon, I have some information for this case.
There bit layout was the following before new thread manager integration:
object info word contains:
0 bit - available for GC
1-6 bits - object hashcode
7 bit - contention bit unused by TM, but
Hi Alexey,
I have taken a look at the patch - generally it looks good to me, and if
it all
works ok when you test it, it's fine by me.
I think if there are cases where some functionality is repeated many
times, it
would be good to see it split out somewhere central. However, Im not sure
the
Weldon,
There bit layout was the following before new thread manager integration:
object info word contains:
0 bit - available for GC
1-6 bits - object hashcode
7 bit - contention bit unused by TM, but used by GC_V4
8-31 bits - other thread manager's data
The new Thread Manager use only
Weldon Washburn wrote:
Looking at drlvm/trunk, it looks like vmcore/include/sync_bits.h
defines the use of *(ref_ptr +4) for 32-bit environment. Just
guessing that #define BUSY_FORWARDING_OFFSET 0 is intended to tell
the GC that it can use the least significant bit out of these four
bytes.
On 8/23/06, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I've tried the patch. 4 math tests failed. Could you please take a look?
Thanks,
Mikhail
Hi Mikhail,
You are right. Two of these four tests are due to typos in the
exception messages:
On 8/24/06, Salikh Zakirov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In any way, currently there is no single header file in the system,
which would describe the object structure. Rather, DRLVM uses some
static assumptions about object header, which are not enforced by any
common include file. This would be a
Ivan, there is no disagreement on the importance of those
verifications (or validations) for Harmony GC. :-) What I was saying
is we need more thinking on the design than the rough idea, such as
when, how, what, etc.
Have you any good idea on the write barrier verfication design? Thanks,
2006/8/24, zouqiong [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi, Mikhail,
1. As for the list 2, Chilimbi acutally use GC moving objects to improve
the cache
localty [Profile-guided Proactive Garbage Collection for Locality
Optimization], but without
his algorithm. I will read the paper again. His algorithm mainly
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Jimmy, Jing Lv wrote:
Hi,
The development on instrument is going to an end (I may still
apply a few patches of refine). And the tests for it do help a lot in
finding bugs and applying compatibility with RI, and special thanks to
Stepan and Support_Exec. :)
2006/8/25, Daniel Fridlender (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1208?page=all ]
Daniel Fridlender updated HARMONY-1208:
---
Attachment: tests.diff.zip
The patch tests.diff to fix test cases.
Hi Daniel,
These
On 8/24/06, Richard Liang wrote:
Hello All,
I'm investigating the possibilities of migrating Harmony tests from
JUnit/Directory layout to TestNG while reviewing all the related thread
in mailing list. And I will try to answer the open issues. To make
things simple, I will post the issues one
Hi Daniel
2006/8/25, Daniel Fridlender [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 8/23/06, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I've tried the patch. 4 math tests failed. Could you please take a look?
Thanks,
Mikhail
Hi Mikhail,
You are right. Two of these four tests are due to typos in the
Daniel
I've just noticed your message on the mailing list. Your arguments sound
reasonable, so I'll try to apply the patch
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/8/25, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2006/8/25, Daniel Fridlender (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[
Qiong,
I think I need to read the whole bunch of articles of Chilimbi this
weekend before
to proceed with implementation.
What is the list of articles you can propose to read to anyone who want to
join this project?
On 8/25/06, zouqiong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/8/24, zouqiong [EMAIL
Can anybody explain me what is the problem with SQLExceptionTest.java?
I've updated it twice but there are no diffs in commit notifications. They
only say: Binary files /tmp/tmpn4i6Jh and /tmp/tmpCQUIda differ
The file has the following properties:
$svn proplist -v SQLExceptionTest.java
40 matches
Mail list logo
