Hi everybody,
I thought I should point out that there is a mailing list dedicated to
parallelism and concurrency in Haskell. The group exists to bring
together the various groups in the Haskell community that are working on
parallelism. It is intended to provide some visibility into the various
I'm interested in creating a list for iPhone development. While I also have
an ongoing iPhone build target project, which I will be open-sourcing very
soon, I'd like the list to be about Haskell on iPhone without regard to
whether it has anything to do with my project.
Ryan
On Fri, Jun 19,
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:38:54 -0400, Ryan Trinkle ryant5...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm interested in starting a mailing list on haskell.org. Who should I talk
to about such things?
One way is to propose the mailing list on the Haskell mailing list
(see the Haskell Info Page at
http
Most likely, if you propose your new mailing list (on the Haskell
mailing list), the discussion will focus on whether it will be likely
to gather enough posts to stay reasonably active. While the
definition of reasonably active differs depending on the individual,
it is likely to mean somewhere
Am Donnerstag, 18. Juni 2009 16:21 schrieb Henning Thielemann:
Ryan Trinkle schrieb:
Hi all,
I'm interested in starting a mailing list on haskell.org
http://haskell.org. Who should I talk to about such things?
Is it a mailing list related to a project? Then you may request a
project
Ryan Trinkle schrieb:
Hi all,
I'm interested in starting a mailing list on haskell.org
http://haskell.org. Who should I talk to about such things?
Is it a mailing list related to a project? Then you may request a
project on community.haskell.org, then you can start a mailing list at
Hi all,
I'm interested in starting a mailing list on haskell.org. Who should I talk
to about such things?
Thanks,
Ryan
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
if and only
if the current message is the first one in a thread.
Ciao, Janis.
--
Dr. Janis Voigtlaender
http://wwwtcs.inf.tu-dresden.de/~voigt/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
apfelmus wrote:
Janis Voigtlaender wrote:
when searching through gmane, and selecting a single message with a
hit, one gets only to see that message without its context thread. At
least I could not find out a way to switch from the found message to
the thread in which it occurred.
The
Janis Voigtlaender wrote:
apfelmus wrote:
The subject line is a hyperlink that points to the context thread of
the message (which is displayed with frames).
only in the case of haskell.cafe, but not for haskell.general. (see
my response to Calvin Smith on the cafe list)
Actually, in
of
the archive.
Same for haskell-cafe.
Anyone knows what is going on?
Thanks,
Janis.
--
Dr. Janis Voigtlaender
http://wwwtcs.inf.tu-dresden.de/~voigt/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo
history of
the archive.
Same for haskell-cafe.
Anyone knows what is going on?
I always use gmane, via:
http://news.gmane.org/search.php?match=haskell
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
messages prior to November 2007, and from 2008.
Too bad...
Ciao,
Janis.
--
Dr. Janis Voigtlaender
http://wwwtcs.inf.tu-dresden.de/~voigt/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
Don Stewart wrote:
voigt:
Hi,
it seems that something is wrong with the search on
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Only messages from Nov and Dec 2007 are found, no matter what search
phrases and date ranges are given.
Worked yesterday and delivered search results over the
On 02/14/2008 11:13 PM, Janis Voigtlaender wrote:
Don Stewart wrote:
voigt:
I always use gmane, via:
http://news.gmane.org/search.php?match=haskell
The problem with this is that when searching through gmane, and
selecting a single message with a hit, one gets only to see that message
Calvin Smith wrote:
On 02/14/2008 11:13 PM, Janis Voigtlaender wrote:
Don Stewart wrote:
voigt:
I always use gmane, via:
http://news.gmane.org/search.php?match=haskell
The problem with this is that when searching through gmane, and
selecting a single message with a hit, one gets only
Dear Haskellers
Does anyone have a complete archive of Haskell mailing list messages
between
May 1998
and
October 2000
On the latter date we moved to mailman, hosted at haskell.org, so there
are archives at haskell.org. I have a complete archive up to May 1998,
courtesy
Folks
Can anyone remember when the Haskell mailing list first opened? Does
anyone have an archive that goes right back to the beginning?
Simon
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
Simon Peyton-Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can anyone remember when the Haskell mailing list first opened? Does
anyone have an archive that goes right back to the beginning?
I don't have a complete archive, but I do have some stored messages
dating back to 10 Jan 1995. A humourous 1st
Simon Peyton-Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can anyone remember when the Haskell mailing list first opened? Does
anyone have an archive that goes right back to the beginning?
In my news archives
(which start 9 Feb 92,
shortly after we got an internet connection back there :-)
I found
Simon,
Can anyone remember when the Haskell mailing list first opened? Does
anyone have an archive that goes right back to the beginning?
The attached posting to the fp mailing list, dated 2 April 1990,
included the announcement of the new haskell mailing list.
Colin R
From
On 08 September 2005 17:53, Glynn Clements wrote:
Frederik Eaton wrote:
However, threading by References, which RFC 2822 says
SHOULD be possible, and which works on my other folders, doesn't work
well on Haskell mailing lists. Presumably the issue is that there are
a large number of
/ - which
invokes different filters, e.g. virus-scanning, spam-assassin and uses
maildrop as MDA.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org
, but never got around to it.
Frederik
--
http://ofb.net/~frederik/
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
]
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
/
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
The Fedora Haskell project now has a mailing list
which is kindly hosted on haskell.org. :)
If you wish to subscribe for announcements and discussion
of packaging Haskell projects for Fedora, please go to
http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-haskell.
More information about the project is
is available on
http://haskell.org/fedora
Cheers, Jens
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
Thanks.
Regards,
Andrew Hamilton
tel: +44 (0) 7956 396396
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d hierarchy of standard libraries for Haskell (including HaXml
amongst many others), which will be completely compiler-independent,
and tested regularly with all three or four currently-available
compilers/interpreters. This should greatly improve the portability
of a lot of publically-available Haskell co
for now.
this make me thinks that this lib is probably not tested under hugs98. could
someone confirm that ? as im too newbies, im maybe missing something
obvious. Id better asking, i thought.
thanks
Luc
___________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ww
Hello!
On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 07:04:07AM -0400, Paul Hudak wrote:
Perhaps we should create a comp.lang.haskell? -Paul
Frankly, I think there's still enough room in c.l.functional for Haskell
related threads. However, if a discussion and vote comes up for a
Haskell newsgroup, I'll off course
| I also agree with Simon that simply making this a moderated list is
| not the solution. Perhaps splitting is best. How about
|
| haskell-info
| haskell-talk
|
| where info carries *brief* announcements, requests for information
| and responses to such requests, and talk carries anything and
I, like many others, are about to get off the Haskell mailing list
unless a way is found to cut down the traffic immediately. I think we
could go far with the current list if people would only exercise some
judgement by not posting every reply to the whole list.
Arvind
Ralf Muschall writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
set up comp.lang.haskell?
I agree with the above.
This is IMHO the best solution for a lot of reasons:
I disagree. One major reason is the spam problem: a post to a
newsgroup essentially guarantees putting your name on a spam mailing
Keith Wansbrough wrote:
[snip]
I disagree. One major reason is the spam problem: a post to a
newsgroup essentially guarantees putting your name on a spam mailing
list, and receiving large quantities of Make Money Fast postings.
I normally spam-proof my e-mail address on newsgroups for this
Would it be possible to have both the current mailing list and a Haskell
newsgroup? If postings to each were automatically replicated on the other,
then each reader could take her choice of which one to follow.
--Ham
--
Hamilton
I would be very sorry to see the Haskell mailing list go to a news group as
I have no way of reading news groups.
Bruce Haxton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 October 1999 11:19
To: S.J.Thompson
Cc: [EMAIL
In article ifado.list.haskell/[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Keith Wansbrough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralf Muschall writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
set up comp.lang.haskell?
I agree with the above.
This is IMHO the best solution for a lot of reasons:
I disagree. One major reason is the spam
Folks,
Traffic on the Haskell mailing list has jumped dramatically of late.
In many ways that's a good thing: I take it a symptomatic that Haskell is
getting used for more things by more people.
But it has a bad side: if traffic is too heavy, large numbers of people will
unsubscribe (indeed
So we can decide to do one of two things:
1. Try to keep the Haskell mailing list as a low-traffic list, to which
many, many people subscribe. Under this model, one might *start*
a discussion on the Haskell list; but after a few exchanges, move the
discussion
Traffic on the Haskell mailing list has jumped dramatically of late.
[...]
So we can decide to do one of two things:
1. Try to keep the Haskell mailing list as a low-traffic list, to which
many, many people subscribe. Under this model, one might *start*
a discussion on the Haskell
Perhaps we should create a comp.lang.haskell? -Paul
S.J.Thompson writes:
I agree with Simon's observations, and would suggest a third option: why not
set up comp.lang.haskell?
I agree with the above.
The established procedure for creation of a news group is documented in the
news.announce.newgroups FAQ available at:
[EMAIL
Colin Runciman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also agree with Simon that simply making this a moderated list is
not the solution. Perhaps splitting is best. How about
haskell-info
haskell-talk
where info carries *brief* announcements, requests for information
and responses to such
Simon PJ is too valuable to lose. I
(a) second the creation of comp.lang.haskell;
(b) suggest that [EMAIL PROTECTED] should have a policy
(enforced mechanically if necessary) of 1 contribution of length
at most 5 lines (or 350 characters) per user per thread.
"Manuel" == Manuel M T Chakravarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Manuel What do you think?
I'll use the opportunity to advocate wiki usage.
While I agree that it seems time to have multiple lists, some of the
recent high volume threads could have used the wiki to collect,
discuss and then
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
set up comp.lang.haskell?
I agree with the above.
This is IMHO the best solution for a lot of reasons:
1. With many providers/client_softwares, you cannot ignore
a mail without downloading and deleting it. This makes it
hard to ignore a thread which one is not
48 matches
Mail list logo
