Hi all,
I've developed a bit of a taste for literate Haskell lately, being a
verbose sort of guy. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to interact with
Haddock in the way I'd like/expect. I just wanted to check that my
understanding of the situation is correct before I (regretfully) give
up
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 17:49 +0100, Andy Gimblett wrote:
So: am I right that this is the intended/expected behaviour? If not,
how does one get round it? If so, could someone perhaps comment on
the prospects/complexity of implementing this - or the reasons why it
is in fact a bad idea?
On 24 Sep 2009, at 18:28, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 17:49 +0100, Andy Gimblett wrote:
So: am I right that this is the intended/expected behaviour? If not,
how does one get round it? If so, could someone perhaps comment on
the prospects/complexity of implementing this - or
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 19:48 +0100, Andy Gimblett wrote:
That's great news for me, except: that's what I tried first, and I've
just tried it again and it still doesn't seem to work for me. Perhaps
I am doing something wrong...?
You're quite right, it got broken with the move to haddock2.
On 24 Sep 2009, at 20:10, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 19:48 +0100, Andy Gimblett wrote:
That's great news for me, except: that's what I tried first, and I've
just tried it again and it still doesn't seem to work for me.
Perhaps
I am doing something wrong...?
You're quite
