Re: [HCP-Users] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [TaskfMRILevel2]feat_modelerror

Thanks for your reply. Is this error due to missing fsf or EVs file? Then should I re-generate EVs and fsf? Best, Bai Haohao -- Original -- From: "Glasser, Matthew";; Date: Sat, Apr 29, 2017 12:47 PM To: "--"<744652...@qq.com>;

Re: [HCP-Users] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [TaskfMRILevel2]feat_modelerror

Likely either could cause the error, but I would guess fsf. Peace, Matt. From: -- <744652...@qq.com> Date: Saturday, April 29, 2017 at 6:46 AM To: Matt Glasser >, hcp-users

Re: [HCP-Users] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [TaskfMRILevel2]feat_modelerror

To simplify your testing, once you have a design.fsf file, if feat_model design doesn’t work, then your fsf file was not set up correctly. [Note that the feat_model command explicitly excludes the .fsf extension, and it will not work if you try to call ‘feat_model design.fsf’] cheers, -MH --

Re: [HCP-Users] variation across connectomes

Not necessarily.. Just curious where the variation comes from whether it can be attributed to particular variables. I'm doing a PCA for variation across subject connectomes (for ex for SC), see a "common" component, but there are additional components, some of which for example correlate very

Re: [HCP-Users] variation across connectomes

Undoubtably. Perhaps the megatrawl would be of interest: https://db.humanconnectome.org/megatrawl/ Peace, Matt. From: Joelle Zimmermann Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 9:15:31 AM To: Glasser, Matthew Cc:

Re: [HCP-Users] variation across connectomes

Hi, Have you read the documentation for the MegaTrawl? cheers, -MH -- Michael Harms, Ph.D. --- Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders Washington University School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134 660 South