I don't think we need to revert to King's or Pope's patronage!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Harminc
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 7:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Patent #6886160
Jay Maynard
Tsai Laurence wrote:
Dears,
Would like to know if any of your shop running the 3390-27 . If yes, why
do you use it ? If no , why dont you use it ?
Any consideration of performance , system administration , s/w limitation ?
1. It is worth to mention, there's no 3390-27. What we have is *so
There's a couple of good Redbooks, I can't remember the exact title. One
in communication server and one in security server, if I'm recalling
correctly.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Howard
Sent: Thursday, June 22,
If somebody could just fix the d*mn spelling. ;-)
Which one? The American or the Britisch?
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
[ snip ]
And i agree with Ed : In order to be understood by the new
tech guys on the next floor , we have to tell them that we
intend to reboot next year because we never do garbagge
collection :-)) .
We don't need to to garbage collection because our bit buckets are
virtually infinite.
I don't believe that!
Cite something.
MVS was out in 1974.
UNIX was out in '76.
Depends on what release and corresponding name you talk about.
If you go the the roots, both OSs were born in the mid 60s:
OS/360 came out in 1964.
MULTICS came out around 1965, which then became UNICS, then UNIX.
To me unix looks and feels very much like DEC/VAX, and DEC surely
precedes IBM !
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hunkeler Peter (KIUB 34)
Sent: 23 June 2006 08:14
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframe Limericks...
MULTICS came out around 1965, which then became UNICS, then UNIX.
UNIX was independent of MULTIX, developed by Bell Labs (Ritchie others).
There is a whole web site with the history, maintained by Bell (or whatever
they've become).
UNIX was a pun on MULTICS.
.
-teD
Marching to the beat of a
Steve,
Why are you fetching the routine more than once? Fetch
it once and it stays there until the process ends. If
Because I want the Prog to start always in its initial state. But ok, I
could do an INITIALIZE to all my WORKING STORAGE stuff.
Is the COBOL program compiled with THREAD? In your
We dumped 20 volumes physically, using DFDSS, using this sort of control
card:
DUMP INDDNAME(DISKn) OUTDDNAME(TAPEn) FULL
n = A, B, C ..
Is there a way to find what dataset(s) are on TAPEA, TAPEB, etc??
--
For
I have installed a user ESR (IGX00222) for SVC 109 into a library in the
LPALST and performed an IPL with CLPA so that the module is now included
in the static LPA. When I run my test program to call the ESR, it reports
that the SVC module IGX00222 is not installed in the SVC table.
If I
We are a JES3 customer and attempted to install z/OS R7.
We got hit with OA16743 (WAIT IN ALLOCATION MODULE IEFAB4FA DURING RECOVERY
ALLOCATION IN A JES3 ENVIRONMENT). Our symptoms don't match exactly what
is written in the APAR, but the bottom line is that any time there are
multiple work
English now belongs to everybody and is all the better for universal
ownership.
There's no doubt that English has been enriched through global ownership.
However, not only spelling differences but also ambiguity is a pain in the
fanny.
q.v. http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/fanny
From: Skip
Hello:
I'm trying to assess the availability of the OS/VS RPG II product
(5740-RG1). I know at least two z/OS sites that use it, so it's still
out there, but I was unable to locate the availability info on IBM.COM.
Can someone point me to the relevant documents? Thanks.
Gilbert Saint-Flour
Good point. But it's a two way street. When talking servers
with non-mainframers, I avoid terms like task, dataset, abend, etc.
When in Rome, ...
From: Edward Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframe
As always you all were correct!
We finally did not stop giving service, but we missed changing the policy so
the IPL in the new machine took a bit longer than needed!
When any of you is changing your box, at the time of changing CFRM policy,
double-check plant-id field
2006/6/16, Bruce
John, try running your FTP client in passive mode.
DJ
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:15:21 +0100, Van Dalsen, Herbie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To me unix looks and feels very much like DEC/VAX, and DEC surely
precedes IBM !
Oh, really
I think not.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Pinion) wrote:
I think (I'm network impaired) he put in some sort of a firewall rule that
allowed the response from that particular host to come back over a different
port than 21.
A . this is ringing a bell now. FTP
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Dave Jones
John, try running your FTP client in passive mode.
Everything I see in the doc referring to passive mode is in context of
servers, not clients. How do I run the FTP client in passive mode?
-jc-
Hunkeler Peter , KIUB 34 wrote:
Depends on what release and corresponding name you talk about.
If you go the the roots, both OSs were born in the mid 60s:
OS/360 came out in 1964.
MULTICS came out around 1965, which then became UNICS, then UNIX.
multics started about then. lots of early 545
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How short memories are. Just a few decades. And UNIX is older than MVS,
BTW.
I don't believe that!
Cite something.
MVS was out in 1974.
UNIX was out in '76.
'Course! Could be wrong!
Yep. From the site that you mentioned
Surely you are joking!
The DEC PDP-1 was a transistor machine. The IBM 7xx and 6xx series were
vacuum tube machines (plus other oddities like drums). NCR and Burroughs
and of course Univac also had vt machines in the 50's.
The 4xx series could be used as calculators. Richard Feynmann says
In a message dated 6/23/2006 1:24:52 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
don't think we need to revert to King's or Pope's patronage!
I actually got this for a gift several years back. I thought it was an OK
read for a dreary day.
Anyone out there running Mobius View Direct notice an unusually large
working set size?
We used to bounce the ViewDirect task each day but stopped a couple of
weeks back. Now I notice a gradual increase in the working set between
bounces. We will start out around 150M but by the end of the week
Sorry to disturb you!
I've inadvertently moved the User.datasets to another disk (where they are
know as User1.Datasets.
But I've forgotten to change the Parmlib assignment in the sys1.parmlib
dataset
Consequence: I can no longer IPL: I receive a message saying that
User.parmlib was not
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MULTICS came out around 1965, which then became UNICS, then UNIX.
UNIX was independent of MULTIX, developed by Bell Labs (Ritchie others).
Ken Thompson is credited with writing UNIX and B. It was originally
called UNICS
The last time I did something similar, I was able to FTP into the system
(since only VTAM was broken), GET the parmlib member, update it on a
PC/Sun (don't remember which), PUT it back into parmlib, and then IPL
successfully.
-Original Message-
From: Yves Lederrey [mailto:[EMAIL
If you are using an (unsupported) pre-Enterprise COBOL compiler, then I
think the answer is pretty simple (and relatively well documented). See
(for example),
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/BOOKS/igypg205/3.4
You cannot run your COBOL program in more than one thread. If you
Execute a DFDSS RESTORE with PARM='TYPRUN=NORUN' and it will simulate
the operation, listing every data set it processes.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 2:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Listing datasets in DFDSS
On 23/06/06, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Dave Jones
John, try running your FTP client in passive mode.
Everything I see in the doc referring to passive mode is in context of
servers, not clients. How
Can you restore them using standalone dfdss? If not, take a look at SAE
(Stand Alone Edit) it is perfect for this type of problem. It let's you
edit files on systems that are not IPLable. It costs a few shekels, but
it could save your behindin this situation.
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 6/23/2006 9:08:57 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any idea how I could fix this ?
If USS is up the FTP method is easiest. Otherwise you can use your
Rescue system to fix the problems. Lacking that get to do Restores
back to a working level.
As a last resort you can IPL the Standalone utility ZZSA and edit what
you need to.
http://www.cbttape.org/~jjaeger/zzsa.html
http://www.cbttape.org/~jjaeger
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
Performance and Availability Management
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John P Kalinich
I use the following statement when FTP'ing dumps to CA.
locsite fwf
OK, I have FWFRIENDLY TRUE in the FTP.DATA file used by my client.
Still doesn't complete the SSL handshake.
-jc-
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 06/23/2006
at 08:47 AM, Shane Ginnane [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
We *all* know what computers are don't we. Used to be flesh and bone
Napier's
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html
We
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 06/22/2006
at 12:59 PM, Mark Steely [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
We are z/OS V1R4 and currently configuring V1R7. What is a SMCS. I am
sure it is a console, but what is the difference between a MCS and a
SMCS?
SNA MCS is via VTAM.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz,
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/22/2006
at 12:21 PM, Bruno Sugliani [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
We french people ( some other foreigners as well) are often using a
strange grammar
Most languages are strange to people who didn't grow up in them.
Personally, I find it strange that a word in German
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 06/22/2006
at 12:58 PM, Skip Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If somebody could just fix the d*mn spelling. ;-)
They have, repeatedly and independently :-(
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
In a message dated 6/23/2006 9:33:38 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a last resort you can IPL the Standalone utility ZZSA and edit what
you need to.
Does it work on Z9's?
--
For IBM-MAIN
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/22/2006
at 02:31 PM, Liliane L. Clever [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Very well said indeed. And by the way, I dare any of the
so-called-real american sysprogs on this list to say in french, or
any other language besides english, what Bruno said so eloquently.
Lamah?
Hi Folks:
I have a z/OS 1.6 LPAR and a z/OS 1.7 LPAR. Both are running as MONOPLEXes
without shared JES2 spool. SHARED=NOCHECK is specified for both on MASDEF.
A 30 minute Enqueue Monitor capture on the 1.6 system shows numerous JES2
checkpoint reserves issued, as one would expect. A similar
In a message dated 6/22/2006 2:32:30 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Definitely a forward. Also, I believe, a subsidiary of Wally Mart... still
no reply.
Got a hot one from Bentonville. JBHunt not a subsidiary of Wally Mart,
competes for resources at IT level.
UNIX was a pun on MULTICS.
Pun or derivative?
According to Ritchie, pun.
.
-teD
Marching to the beat of a different flute
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Over the years I have seen this message appear at different time
throughout our Sysplex:
IGD042I COMMDS dsname SUCCESSFULLY REPAIRED
I only saw one hit on IBMLINK in regards to using MIM at IPL time. It
appears we convert the Reserves to a Global Enqueue correctly for Qname
IGDCDSXS.
All
Ed I have not tried it yet but I don't have any reason to believe it
doesn't. I have tested it on previous zSeries processors.
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
Performance and Availability Management
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Consequence: I can no longer IPL: I receive a message saying that
User.parmlib was not found on Z7SYS1, and the VTAM abends saying that
one
module is in a non authorized library.
If getting VTAM up will allow you to fix your problem can't you APF-
authorize the necessary libraries
If you have activated GSK trace via the environment variable someone
mentioned earlier, the grace will be written to a file in the /tmp
directory. It will have gsk somewhere in the name, and some kind of numeric
qualifier to make it unique. I forget exactly what it looks like, but you
should be
IF you have Omegamon or Sysview or any other product that has a terminal
interface you could use that product to APF authorized that library.
Saved me.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bob Lamerand
Sent: Friday, June
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/23/2006
at 07:51 AM, Anne Lynn Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
in the mid-70s, as part of getting ready for 370/xa that would come
out in the early 80s with 3081 ... work on mvs/xa was begun.
What did they use for a test machine before the 3081 was available?
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/23/2006
at 08:53 AM, Tom Marchant [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Much older? The Multics project started in 1964.
When was SPREAD? When did IBM start designing OS/360? That was
certainly well before 1964.
Ken Thompson joined the team in 1966.
That was MULTICS, which is
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 06/23/2006
at 10:00 AM, Kirk Talman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
All the AEC national labs in the 50's made their own machines.
Robert Rannie of Share boat paddle fame made his start as a
programmer in Oak Ridge National Laboratory (X-10 site) on one of
those machines.
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 06/23/2006
at 09:13 AM, Hunkeler Peter (KIUB 34)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MULTICS came out around 1965, which then became UNICS, then UNIX.
No, MULTICS did *not* become UNICS; the two are unrelated. Don't
confuse staffing with design.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.)
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 06/23/2006
at 09:15 AM, Van Dalsen, Herbie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
To me unix looks and feels very much like DEC/VAX,
VAX is a hardware architecture; perhaps you mean VMS, which didn't
look remotely like Unix.
and DEC surely precedes IBM !
Not even close; IBM is
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/22/2006
at 10:16 AM, Charles Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Was it Gene Amdahl who said the biggest mistake of the 360
architecture was the 24-bit addresses?
I don't know, but it certainly shocked me, given that there were
already machines with a million words of
In a message dated 6/23/2006 9:47:15 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ed I have not tried it yet but I don't have any reason to believe it
doesn't. I have tested it on previous zSeries processors.
Thanks, seems straight forward enough. But ya never know.
Use the SETPROG MVS command to APF the library.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 10:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Help: User.parmlib inadvertently renamed
In a message
I've got a question concerning enlarging volumes on a DS8100. Are there
any listservs dedicated to IBM storage?
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems
1700 Summit Lake Drive
Tallahassee, FL. 32317
Office: 850.219.5184
Fax: 888.221.9862
http://www.mainline.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Matt Simpson
If you have activated GSK trace via the environment variable
someone mentioned earlier, the grace will be written to a
file in the /tmp directory. It will have gsk somewhere in
the name, and some
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:10:59 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/22/2006
at 10:16 AM, Charles Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Was it Gene Amdahl who said the biggest mistake of the 360
architecture was the 24-bit addresses?
snip!
I
Consider using the PASSIVEDATAPORTS parameter in the server's FTP data file
to specify the range of ports used for the data connection. That can reduce
the size of the hole that the network guys have to poke in the firewall.
--
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:40:24 -0500, Cal McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a z/OS 1.6 LPAR and a z/OS 1.7 LPAR. Both are running as MONOPLEXes
without shared JES2 spool. SHARED=NOCHECK is specified for both on MASDEF.
A 30 minute Enqueue Monitor capture on the 1.6 system shows numerous
Shmuel,
My mistake...
I was mere referring to the PDP-11 that was a few years before the
S/360..
This piece is from the DEC archives...
Instead they started building small digital modules (each effectively
a single component from the TX-2 design) that could be combined together
to be used in a
From z/OS 1.6 system:
$D MASDEF
$HASP843 MASDEF 537
$HASP843 MASDEF OWNMEMB=SYS1,AUTOEMEM=OFF,CKPTLOCK=ACTION,
$HASP843 COLDTIME=(2004.273,23:23:16),COLDVRSN=z/OS 1.4,
$HASP843
I agree it's a shortcoming. FWIW, My impression has always been that the
hardware architects thought the base register/displacement scheme was their
answer to or version of hardware relocation.
Over time, though, link editor/loader relocation has seldom been a problem
(except for our VSE friends,
Shmuel,
I expect you have in mind Mädchen and Fräulein. I put this down to
following the rules wherever they take you - in a manner not dissimilar to
the must not problem I covered yesterday in IBMTCP-L. The suffixes -chen
and -lein - or simply -l as in stübl - require the neuter gender,
das,
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:40:24 -0500, Cal McCracken wrote:
I have a z/OS 1.6 LPAR and a z/OS 1.7 LPAR. Both are running as MONOPLEXes
without shared JES2 spool. SHARED=NOCHECK is specified for both on MASDEF.
A 30 minute Enqueue Monitor capture on the 1.6 system shows numerous JES2
checkpoint
Check your HCD (I/O gen) to verify that the DASD is defined as SHARED in
both LPARs. (I'd bet that it is SHARED on the 1.6 LPAR but not on the 1.7
LPAR.) That would account for the lack of reserve activity.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
Tom,
I've already checked that and they are defined as
Are other people seeing re-posts, as well?
This was sent yesterday, and I remember reading it.
I thought it was GMAIL, so I went and emptied my inbox.
This is still happening.
--Original Message--
From: Jack Kelly
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To: Mainframe
Chris Mason wrote:
I expect you have in mind Mädchen and Fräulein. I put this down to
following the rules wherever they take you - in a manner not dissimilar to
the must not problem I covered yesterday in IBMTCP-L. The suffixes -chen
and -lein - or simply -l as in stübl - require the neuter
Shmuel Metz , Seymour J. wrote:
What did they use for a test machine before the 3081 was available?
There was a micro-order on the 3168 that was highly suggestive.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006m.html#25 Mainframe Limericks
refers to posting
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006m.html#21 The
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:49:41 -0500, Cal McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've already checked that and they are defined as shared to all LPARs. (I'm
pretty careful with that after trashing a shared RACF database a few years
ago due to that very situation).
By curiosity , can we see the
Shmuel Metz , Seymour J. wrote:
I don't know, but it certainly shocked me, given that there were
already machines with a million words of memory. It didn't take a
crystal ball to forsee growing memory demand.
I wouldn't call that the biggest mistake, however. When the S/360 came
out virtually
Bob Shannon wrote:
Yes, we use it. Mod-27 is a fabrication - there is no actually device
type called 3390-27. The same is true for Mod-54. Most software will
report the device as a Mod-9. There shouldn't be performance problems as
it's using SCSI drives on the backend. Check your DR shop to
By curiosity , can we see the $ckptdef results on both lpar ?
Thanks
Bruno
Bruno(dot)sugliani(at)groupemornay(dot)asso(dot)fr
From z/OS 1.6 system:
$D CKPTDEF
$HASP829 CKPTDEF 793
$HASP829 CKPTDEF
Ken,
What component ( job/task ) of View Direct is experiencing this behavior
(i.e. CICS region, Administration Task, other, etc. )?
We are running the View Direct ( release 6.2 ) and Document Direct (
release 1.2 ) and we haven't experienced exactly what you have described.
We do see
I once met a computer - in his eighties in the 1970s. He'd worked for the
Admiralty during
the war as a general purpose computer helping with ship design, navigation
tables and the
like. He knew that many wrinkles...
At Continental Gummiwerke in Hannover they have a Data Processing Department
Set TSO-REXX nomail
-
-teD
300,000 Kilometres per Second
Not only is it a good idea!
It's the LAW!!!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:49:41 -0500, Cal McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check your HCD (I/O gen) to verify that the DASD is defined as SHARED in
both LPARs. (I'd bet that it is SHARED on the 1.6 LPAR but not on the 1.7
LPAR.) That would account for the lack of reserve activity.
I've
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/23/2006
at 08:55 AM, Yves Lederrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Any idea how I could fix this ?
Logon on to your emergency system, or use a standalone editor.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:19:55 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does you 1.7 system have any activity going on? Try this: go into
RMFMON and hit PF9 (SENQR). Then you or someone else stop and start
a couple STCs from a console or submit some batch jobs while you are
hitting enter
Is anybody else seeing duplication of postings?
I have seen this message at least three times!
At first, I thought it was GMAIL, but I've cleaned that out.
.
-teD
Marching to the beat of a different flute
-Original Message-
From: Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri,
Bruno,
Somehow I missed the start of this thread and I cannot track down the post
where the word JCLs was used. Thus I was responding only to the complaint
about the use of the word JCLs.
I did find some earlier posts in the thread - and some not particularly good
limericks - through Google
How do I tell if my machine is running 31 or 64 bit mode? Does
ARCHLVL=1 mean 31 bit and ARCHLVL=2 mean 64 bit?
Thanks.
Rex
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:13:00 +0200, Phil Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RESEARCH.FREESERVE.CO.UK wrote:
Snip!
That led to other weirdness. My COBOL is now rusty, but IIRC there are
two ways of handling
an array or table - indexes and subscripts? One was computed when set,
the other when used,
and
READY
TEST 'SYS1.LINKLIB(IEFBR14)'
TEST
L a3.
00A3. 0101528C
TEST
end
READY
If the field FLCARCH in the PSA which is at PSA+A3 is x'01' you are
running z/Architecture.
If you are z/OS R6 or higher you are running z/Architecture
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:06:11 -0500, Pommier, Rex R.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I tell if my machine is running 31 or 64 bit mode? Does
ARCHLVL=1 mean 31 bit and ARCHLVL=2 mean 64 bit?
Thanks.
It depends. What level of z/OS are you running? If you are 1.5 or
higher on a zArchitecture
UNIX was officially named in 1970. MVS was released in 1974. However
MVS was preceded by MVT which was released in 1964.
David W Neylon, Sr
Consultant/Data Security Analyst
Information Security Technology
(480) 724-4644
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wells Fargo Confidential
This message may contain
OK, it's finally Friday. The English spelling that needs fixing is not the
trivial inconsistency between US and UK. It's the pervasive internal
inconsistency within the language itself. Steel vs. steal vs. stele. Say
what?
Why was the latest North American National Spelling Bee a multi-hour
I'm running 1.4 on a z9-BC processor. If I do the D IPLINFO I get the
following output:
IEE254I 14.56.40 IPLINFO DISPLAY 369
SYSTEM IPLED AT 13.24.33 ON 06/23/2006
RELEASE z/OS 01.04.00LICENSE = z/OS
USED LOAD83 IN SYS1.PARMLIB ON 1E20
ARCHLVL = 2 MTLSHARE = N
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:51:12 -0500, Eric N. Bielefeld eric-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Actually, that brings up something that bugs me about this list. A lot of
people use acronyms, and don't define them. Lots of acronyms on this
list,
most system programmers should know, but there are many
Pommier, Rex R. wrote:
I am looking at using the SCRT and one of it's requirements is that I am
running 64 bit on everything. So a more specific question would be is
z/OS 1.4 running on a z9-BC machine that shows ARCHLVL=2 running in 64
bit mode?
Yes.
Bob
Yes. You are in 64 bit mode.
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
Performance and Availability Management
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(office) 301.986.3574
If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of
I have been connecting to my 2086 thru the HMC for the past month. Today
I'm getting ???badprotocoltitle??? error after entering the user
password.
I believe this is related only to my laptop, but don't know what could
have changed to cause this error.
Anyone have any ideas?
Rogers
Bob, Tom, and Sam.
Thank you for helping me out with this one. I dug through the init and
tuning reference and it was talking about arch level 1 and 2, but it
didn't quite get around to defining what that actually meant.
Even with the bunny trails this list chases (football versus soccer,
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:12:17 -0500, Laine, Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have been connecting to my 2086 thru the HMC for the past month. Today
I'm getting ???badprotocoltitle??? error after entering the user
password.
I believe this is related only to my laptop, but don't know what could
I just noticed in the daily SYSLOG file we generate, that I am always
getting 2
incorrect days along with the current day seems to have started the day
of an IPL.
For example: the most current file is SYSLOG.DVLP.D060622 which was created
at Midnight (6/22-6/23) ---
It should have only
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UNIX was officially named in 1970. MVS was released in 1974. However
MVS was preceded by MVT which was released in 1964.
os/360 ... pcp. i don't remember that you could sysgen mvt until
release 12.
boeing huntsville had custom modified mvt version 13 with virtual
Mark,
If you are running a windows XP mahine and if you had applied one of
those security patches released last week (i.e jun 12 or 13th), seem to
affect some network functionality.
Refer to microsoft security bulleting MS06-25 or even MS06-21 (internet
explorer) is related to routing and
On Friday 23 June 2006 07:52, Jim Marshall wrote:
I'm trying to assess the availability of the OS/VS RPG II product ...
You may be the RPG for OS/MVT is available on the CBT site and last I
heard it is still working all the way into z/OS. I put it onto the CBT
Tape years ago and have heard
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
