Tom Longfellow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/17/2007 07:40:52 PM:
Thanks for the answer. While I still do not understand SPLICE and IFTHEN
well enough to build one from scratch, I was able to modify your example
to
handle my VB records (RECT1 and RECT2 are not the same length). I have
I could get past whatever it is that makes it so hard for me to
understand the syntax of these newer features.
There's an interesting project for someone: a lanuage preprocessor for
SORT which accepts a different syntax, and produces SORT control
statements; or a wrapper which does the same
On 18 Jan 2007 10:20:13 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
I could get past whatever it is that makes it so hard for me to
understand the syntax of these newer features.
There's an interesting project for someone: a lanuage preprocessor for
SORT which accepts a different syntax, and
On 18 Jan 2007, you wrote in bit.listserv.ibm-main:
I could get past whatever it is that makes it so hard for me to
understand the syntax of these newer features.
I don't personally have a problem with the syntax, but I know a lot of
people seem to. I think, also, that we're seeing more
Tom Longfellow wrote:
I originally wrote a REXX exec to perform this function, but I am hoping
that some combination of all of the new SORT verbs will help me improve
the
performance of my original solution. I have tried working out something
by reading the manuals, but I just can not put it
5 matches
Mail list logo
