In d9a38e3a-ca51-4033-be46-9d37265ee...@comcast.net, on 05/21/2012
at 11:24 PM, Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net said:
I vaguely remember an IBM product (INFO-MVS) which was (if memory
serves me) was a single (??) reel 6250 tape sent monthly by IBM.
INFO-MVS was another product in the same
In fkjpr71k9aqo209gi143h9g9hnuq125...@4ax.com, on 05/23/2012
at 08:54 AM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca said:
On a logical basis I agree with you but has the 24/7/365 shortcut
for continuous availability become so pervasive that it is the
shorthand way for saying it
Shorthand? How
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In fkjpr71k9aqo209gi143h9g9hnuq125...@4ax.com, on 05/23/2012
at 08:54 AM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca said:
On a logical basis I agree with you but has the 24/7/365 shortcut
for
zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:CAFO-8tqWyJKz+G7jJXvgooJ7QinzBAo=rw0+ywebrx8_jbv...@mail.gmail.com
...
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In fkjpr71k9aqo209gi143h9g9hnuq125...@4ax.com, on 05/23/2012
at 08:54
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
zMan
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 6:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: 24/7/365 appropriateness was Re: IBMLink outages in 2012
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote
On 22 May 2012 20:04:42 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
In hj3lr7lassfuf88ovoeg000i1pp935e...@4ax.com, on 05/21/2012
at 03:51 PM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca said:
I'm the last to see my own errors. Hopefully it was obvious I
meant 24/7/365
That's no better. Either
In actuality, isn't 24x7 comprehensive enough?
The 24 infers that the availability is round the clock, as opposed to most
operating schedules that embrace a single day shift of 8 hours (banker's
hours), or a day of 14 or 16 hours.
The 7 infers that availability is every day of the week, as
@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: 24/7/365 appropriateness was Re: IBMLink outages in 2012
In actuality, isn't 24x7 comprehensive enough?
The 24 infers that the availability is round the clock, as opposed to most
operating schedules that embrace a single day shift of 8 hours (banker's
hours), or a day of 14
cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca (Clark Morris) writes:
On a logical basis I agree with you but has the 24/7/365 shortcut for
continuous availability become so pervasive that it is the shorthand
way for saying it and is it the way that the general public as opposed
to us professional nitpickers best
: bfairch...@rocketsoftware.com * w:
www.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Clark Morris
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 6:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: 24/7/365 appropriateness was Re: IBMLink outages
was Re:
IBMLink outages in 2012
Volcker in discussion with civil engineering professor about
significantly decline in infrastructure projects (as institutions
skimmed funds for other purposes disappearing civil engineering jobs)
resulting in universities cutting back civil engineering programs
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Bill Fairchild
bfairch...@rocketsoftware.com wrote:
And the general public, many Dilbertian managers, and even some of us
professional nitpickers, think that a job running 1 hour instead of 10 is
900% faster, and that 1 is 10 times smaller than 10. 2+2 no
On Wed, 23 May 2012 14:20:03 +, Bill Fairchild wrote:
And the general public, many Dilbertian managers, and even some of us
professional nitpickers, think that a job running 1 hour instead of 10 is 900%
faster,
I believe that's correct usage, even as an airplane that flies from
New York
: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 6:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: 24/7/365 appropriateness was Re: IBMLink outages in 2012
On 22 May 2012 20:04:42 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Inhj3lr7lassfuf88ovoeg000i1pp935e...@4ax.com, on 05/21/2012
at 03:51 PM, Clark Morriscfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca
In hj3lr7lassfuf88ovoeg000i1pp935e...@4ax.com, on 05/21/2012
at 03:51 PM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca said:
I'm the last to see my own errors. Hopefully it was obvious I
meant 24/7/365
That's no better. Either 24/7/52 or 24/365 would be approximately
correct.
--
Shmuel
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Clark Morris
Sent: Monday, 21 May 2012 1:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBMLink outages in 2012
On 20 May 2012 18:28:50 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On 5/20/2012 7:33 PM, Mary Anne Matyaz wrote:
Except
: Monday, May 21, 2012 1:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBMLink outages in 2012
On 20 May 2012 20:18:55 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
24/7/265? That hurts, sounds more like my tyres.
I'm the last to see my own errors. Hopefully it was obvious I meant
24/7/365 (or should
My consideration is many applications in IBMLink don't seem to merit the cost
of true continuous operations. I think it is unreasonable to ask for
24/7/365(6), for all of IBMLink.
We need high availability for applications that enable us to effectively
support our own high availability
Actually, in 24 / 7 / 365, why are days listed twice?
24 hours a day, 365 days a year would cover it (ignoring leap day).
24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year covers it a more
sensible way (ignoring the extra day or two past 364 days).
24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 weeks? What
On 21 May 2012 13:27:19 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main Sam Knutson
wrote:
My consideration is many applications in IBMLink don't seem to merit the cost
of true continuous operations. I think it is unreasonable to ask for
24/7/365(6), for all of IBMLink.
As someone who has been away from
This brings back memories pre IBMLINK.
I vaguely remember an IBM product (INFO-MVS) which was (if memory
serves me) was a single (??) reel 6250 tape sent monthly by IBM.
I was the one designated to load the tape into an VSAM dataset. The
team was 8 (or was it 9) sysprogs and all of us
. The
average up-time so far in 2012 is 98.46% ... not even two nines.
Of course, things look far worse if you consider weekends -- when most customer
scheduled outages take place -- to be 'prime time' for IBMLink availability
%: clearly trending in the wrong direction. The
average up-time so far in 2012 is 98.46% ... not even two nines.
Of course, things look far worse if you consider weekends -- when most customer
scheduled outages take place -- to be 'prime time' for IBMLink availability
-- to be 'prime time' for IBMLink availability.
:-\
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
For our purposes, an outage is an outage
24/7/265? That hurts, sounds more like my tyres.
MARK DOUGLAS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Clark Morris
Sent: Monday, 21 May 2012 1:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBMLink outages in 2012
On 20 May 2012 18
I compiled the following list of IBMLink outages in 2012, and the %
availability (total hours - outage hours/total hours * 100) for calendar
year 2012.
February 18-19 (12-hour outage)99.0% availability
March 2-3 (12-hour outage)98.4% availability
May 4-7 (54-hour outage
if you consider weekends -- when most customer
scheduled outages take place -- to be 'prime time' for IBMLink availability. :-\
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400 x318
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
http
:53
Till: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Ämne: IBMLink Outage May 4-7
27 April 2012
This is to inform you that IBMLink will have a planned outage for a
system
upgrade starting on Friday, May 4th at 9:00 PM MT through Monday, May
7th at
3:00 AM MT.
During this time IBMLink will be down.
Thank
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBMLink Outage May 4-7
Makes you feel good about all that work we've been doing with IBM,
doesn't it?
You betcha. I think what aggravates me the most is that can
still say it's up 24x7, because 'scheduled maintenance
windows' don't count.
MA
In most (if not all) cases I have found the second generation tools
(SIS, Support Portal, IBM Link, z/OS Internet Library,) to be
inferior to the systems they replaced.
Performance, availability, and ease of use have all suffered. The only
item I can give a passing grade to is content. (and
Yeah, I've done push/pulls on 3090's in under 48. Can't imagine what's
involved. Seems like a contractual violation, maybe if their monthly stipend is
similarly late they might be more motivated.
In a message dated 5/3/2012 12:38:49 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
4184
If you feel in control
you just aren't going fast enough.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Ed Finnell
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 12:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBMLink Outage May 4-7
Yeah, I've done
Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 5/2/2012 7:27 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
IBM should explain what it expects to accomplish during this--on the
face of it--absurdly long interval.
Absurd indeed! When was the last time one of IBM's mainframe customers
enjoyed a 54-hour maintenance/upgrade outage window?
27 April 2012
This is to inform you that IBMLink will have a planned outage for a system
upgrade starting on Friday, May 4th at 9:00 PM MT through Monday, May 7th at
3:00 AM MT.
During this time IBMLink will be down.
Thank you for your patience and understanding.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix
Wow. That's...a lot of downtime. :( Do you know if that includes SR?
Thanks,
MA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On 5/2/2012 11:24 AM, Mary Anne Matyaz wrote:
Wow. That's...a lot of downtime. :( Do you know if that includes SR?
No idea. The news article is very brief. (See below.)
https://www.ibm.com/ibmlink/news/NewsServlet.wss?referrer=newsMaincommand=Getnews_item_id=5446lc=encc=US
I agree
I've complained to our IBM account team repeatedly that having IBMLink have
down time during the weekend when we have our changes scheduled is a big
exposure. I'd love to see them move out of the window most customers have their
change windows - maybe other accounts could also raise the issue
On 2 May 2012 14:05:30 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
I've complained to our IBM account team repeatedly that having IBMLink have
down time during the weekend when we have our changes scheduled is a big
exposure. I'd love to see them move out of the window most customers have
In all the time I've been doing this, I would never have dared ask for outages
of this magnitude. The worst I ever was part of was a couple 12-14 hour
unexpected weekend days when we didn't have fall back ready. I think that was
also the time after VM and before we did a sandbox LPAR, so we did
On 5/2/2012 5:05 PM, Jerry Whitteridge wrote:
I've complained to our IBM account team repeatedly that having IBMLink have
down time during the weekend when we have our changes scheduled is a big
exposure. I'd love to see them move out of the window most customers have their
change windows
On 5/2/2012 2:25 PM, Mary Anne Matyaz wrote:
Wow. That's...a lot of downtime. :( Do you know if that includes SR?
Thanks,
MA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On 5/2/2012 2:34 PM, Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 5/2/2012 11:24 AM, Mary Anne Matyaz wrote:
Wow. That's...a lot of downtime. :( Do you know if that includes SR?
No idea. The news article is very brief. (See below.)
https://www.ibm.com/ibmlink/news/NewsServlet.wss?referrer=newsMaincommand
On 5/2/2012 3:35 PM, Gibney, Dave wrote:
With the new ERP system they are moving us to, scheduled outages of this length
are routine. :( but it's better than the working legacy :)
Double standard.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 4:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBMLink Outage May 4-7
On 5/2/2012 3:35 PM, Gibney, Dave wrote:
With the new ERP system
Makes you feel good about all that work we've been doing with IBM,
doesn't it?
You betcha. I think what aggravates me the most is that can still say it's up
24x7, because 'scheduled maintenance windows' don't count.
MA
--
For
On 2 May 2012 17:40:01 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Makes you feel good about all that work we've been doing with IBM,
doesn't it?
You betcha. I think what aggravates me the most is that can still say it's up
24x7, because 'scheduled maintenance windows' don't count.
Maybe those
IBM should explain what it expects to accomplish during this--on the
face of it--absurdly long interval.
If IBMLink's deplorable availability will be very much improved after
it, this outage may well be justifiable. If not, not.
In general, it is time for more transparency about these issues;
On 5/2/2012 7:27 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
IBM should explain what it expects to accomplish during this--on the
face of it--absurdly long interval.
Absurd indeed! When was the last time one of IBM's mainframe customers enjoyed a
54-hour maintenance/upgrade outage window? I have never seen
Gil, did you try going in to 'View ETR Record' and putting in the pmr number
and branch?
https://www-304.ibm.com/ibmlink/etr/etrViewSubmit.wss
I did, and I am not authorized to view that record, but it *is* there.
MA
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 05:48:43 -0600, Mary Anne Matyaz wrote:
Gil, did you try going in to 'View ETR Record' and putting in the pmr number
and branch?
https://www-304.ibm.com/ibmlink/etr/etrViewSubmit.wss
I did, and I am not authorized to view that record, but it *is* there.
Indeed. Works
:
Hello, Feedback,
I have received the following email notification:
This mail is from a Service Machine, please do not reply.
If you have any questions or need further assistance regarding this IBMLink
notification, please go to:
https://www-304.ibm.com/ibmlink?lc=encc=US
Is anyone else having issues getting to IBMLINK?
Thanks,
Jon
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the
sender by reply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately.
Thank you. Aetna
Works for me Jon.
Bob Shannon
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
I placed an order for maintenance this morning without issues.
John Eatherly
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Veilleux, Jon L
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 6:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: IBMLINK
Is anyone
We must not have paid our billlol
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Bob Shannon
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 8:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBMLINK
Works for me Jon.
Bob Shannon
snip
We must not have paid our billlol
/snip
For PTF research, etc... try here:
http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/search/
For all other activities, Pay your Bill! G
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBMLINK
snip
We must not have paid our billlol
/snip
For PTF research, etc... try here:
http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/search/
For all other activities, Pay your Bill! G
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
*
I am getting a 505 for IBMLINK. I have also been getting disconnected multiple
times while trying to order a ServerPac, although a test order CBPDO worked
fine. Something bad is happening at POKL1, I imagine, and they do not seem to
be informing anyone
Not necessarily. A communication line between you site and the target
site could be down and IP has not figured out a re-route yet.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Glen Gasior glen.manages@gmail.com wrote:
*
I am getting a 505 for IBMLINK. I have also been getting disconnected
multiple
,
Linda
- Original Message -
From: Skip Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 8:47:06 PM
Subject: Re: Security Certificate error message at IBMLINK
This bump in the road has not impeded my business, merely added an extra
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:27:48 -0300 Clark Morris wrote:
Amazing how unreliable IBMLINK, the support function for the 24/7
mainframe seems to be. Is it hosted on z? Should it be hosted on z?
Unfortunately the platform, even a good one, isn't going to resolve
inherent frailties like those
I also opened a Feedback PMR# 40016,499,000 in IBMLink.
I would encourage everyone who is seeing this to put in a Feedback using
IBMLink Feedback or SR till this is resolved.
This is basic certificate management off the rails. An SSL certificate expired
for 3 days is still being served
Yes.
It's back to normal today.
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Linda Mooney
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 3:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Security Certificate error message at IBMLINK
What URL are you using?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Linda Mooney
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 3:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Security Certificate error message at IBMLINK
Hi Mike,
And they're
Advice from the IBMLink feedback apparently they did correct something.
Cleared cache and cookies as instructed and exited the browser (IE) completely
and a valid non-expired certificate is now being served.
https://www.ibm.com/ibmlink
Best Regards, Sam Knutson
-NARAYANAN, SREENATH
Skip,
Sigh macs are even more security concuss and we get a similar message that is
hard to ignore.
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message:
Hi Mike,
I usually use www.ibmlink.ibm.com support asked me to try www.ibm.com/ibmlink
so I did and it didn't make any difference. Tryed after I got home on a fresh
boot, no diff. This morning, no expired cert and I don't have to log in. I
type the URL and it takes me right in! Not good
-
From: Sam Knutson sknut...@geico.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 7:40:09 AM
Subject: Re: Security Certificate error message at IBMLINK
Advice from the IBMLink feedback apparently they did correct something.
Cleared cache and cookies as instructed and exited
The expired cetificate is back. I was gone for a while. :-( Anybody else?
Linda
- Original Message -
From: Linda Mooney linda.lst...@comcast.net
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 10:29:16 AM
Subject: Re: Security Certificate error message at IBMLINK
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 09/27/2011 03:11 PM
Subject:Re: Security Certificate error message at IBMLINK
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
The expired cetificate is back. I was gone for a while. :-( Anybody
else?
Linda
- Original Message
��z{S���}�ĝ� �xjǺ�*'���O*^��m��Z�w!j�
Am I the only one for whom this didn't unencode?
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Linda Mooney linda.lst...@comcast.net wrote:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
CgpHcmVldGluZ3MhIAoKCgpBbnlib2R5IGVsc2UgZ2V0dGluZyB0aGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIG1lc3Nh
Yipes! let me try this again. I don't know what happened.
Greetings!
Anybody else getting the following message trying to access IBMLINK this
today? All was well yesterday, but this today -
The security certificate presented by this website has expired or is
not yet valid
The digital certificate expiring has been reported to IBM.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Linda Mooney linda.lst...@comcast.net wrote:
Yipes! let me try this again. I don't know what happened.
Greetings!
Anybody else getting the following message trying to access IBMLINK this
today
:42:46 PM
Subject: Re: Security Certificate error message at IBMLINK
The digital certificate expiring has been reported to IBM.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Linda Mooney linda.lst...@comcast.net wrote:
Yipes! let me try this again. I don't know what happened.
Greetings!
Anybody
...@comcast.net
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 09/26/2011 01:48 PM
Subject:Re: Security Certificate error message at IBMLINK
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Hi Mike,
And they're telling me that it ain't so, that I must be doing something to
cause
error message at IBMLINK
I've been getting the message since yesterday Sunday. Everyone here is.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
SCE Infrastructure Technology Services
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
On 26 Sep 2011 13:56:27 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Thanks Skip, I appreciate it. The just closed my SR for the third time and
I'm getting plenty steamed
Amazing how unreliable IBMLINK, the support function for the 24/7
mainframe seems to be. Is it hosted on z? Should
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
From: Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 09/26/2011 05:28 PM
Subject:Re: Security Certificate error message at IBMLINK
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN
On 20 May 2011 12:50:01 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Fixpack #2 - Outage Communication
9 May 2011
This is to inform you that IBMLink will have a planned outage starting
on Friday, May 20th at 8:00 PM Eastern Time through Saturday, May 21th
at 8:00 AM Eastern Time This planned
Unable to reconnect from Chicagoland USA, although I was signed in
earlier today.
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET
Yup, same here in Akron.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
Unable to reconnect from Chicagoland USA, although I was signed in
earlier today.
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Curious. I normally access it from IE. Can't get to it just now with IE, but
I can with firefox. :(
MA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET
@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBMLink just shot craps again
Curious. I normally access it from IE. Can't get to it just now with IE, but
I can with firefox. :(
MA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Like many others, I could not reach IBMLINK today. IE 8 failed altogether.
Firefox got to the sign-in page but then failed afterward.
It's magically back now. This was never a user 'issue'.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
SCE Infrastructure Technology Services
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Skip Robinson
Like many others, I could not reach IBMLINK today. IE 8 failed
altogether.
Firefox got to the sign-in page but then failed afterward.
It's magically back now. This was never a user 'issue
Fixpack #2 - Outage Communication
9 May 2011
This is to inform you that IBMLink will have a planned outage starting
on Friday, May 20th at 8:00 PM Eastern Time through Saturday, May 21th
at 8:00 AM Eastern Time This planned outage will occur because of the
installation of our Janyary fixpack
Nice catch. I glanced at this notice a while back but failed to zero in on
the weekday time frame.
Some gratuitous advice for the IBMLINK zoo keepers: a 'friendly page'
reminding clueless users like me would be a far more professional way to
manage a planned outage than what we actually got
in on
the weekday time frame.
Some gratuitous advice for the IBMLINK zoo keepers: a 'friendly page'
reminding clueless users like me would be a far more professional way to
manage a planned outage than what we actually got. handed.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
SCE Infrastructure Technology Services
Electric
Of Ken Porowski
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 12:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: IBMLINK Planned Outage Today
Fixpack #2 - Outage Communication
9 May 2011
This is to inform you that IBMLink will have a planned outage starting
on Friday, May 20th at 8:00 PM Eastern Time through Saturday
On 5/20/2011 3:57 PM, Gibney, Dave wrote:
Nice, and I have a total machine room power-outage and chiller
improvement starting tonight at 00:00 Pacific :)
You couldn't have timed it better. It's almost as if you deliberately planned it
that way...
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software
Getting an 500 Internal Server Error this morning. Is anyone else
getting the same error?
--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL
Surrounding yourself with dwarfs does not make you a giant
--
For IBM-MAIN
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
Getting an 500 Internal Server Error this morning. Is anyone else
getting the same error?
Same error in Chicagoland. I'm SO-O-O surprised. :-|
-jc-
Here in CT also
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Chase, John
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 8:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBMLINK Down?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
] On Behalf Of
Veilleux, Jon L
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 8:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBMLINK Down?
Here in CT also
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Chase, John
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 8:16 AM
Don't have access to IBM link, however try
http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Troubleshooting
for normal research.
ETR's, etc. of course will require IBMLINK.
snip
Getting an 500 Internal Server Error this morning. Is anyone else
getting the same error?
/snip
Looks like its back up.
On 02/04/11 09:14, Staller, Allan wrote:
Don't have access to IBM link, however try
http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Troubleshooting
for normal research.
ETR's, etc. of course will require IBMLINK.
snip
Getting an 500 Internal Server Error this morning
On 1/31/2011 10:56 AM, David Magee wrote:
I noticed the slightly new format on the web page I get to with my old
bookmark for IBMLink ... its now called ServiceLink and the web page has the
ETR application moved to the bottom with a sunset date. In its old position
we now see the Service Request
I notice that the titles of the ETRs have not been converted. That's quite a
pain.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Edward Jaffe
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 2:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBMLink Update
lives
It is wise to keep in mind that neither
success nor failure is ever final...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Chase, John
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 9:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: IBMLink f*ed up again
1 - 100 of 1169 matches
Mail list logo
