Re: SMFPRMxx ACTIVE/NOACTIVE parameter and SMF exit IEFACTRT

2011-11-10 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Dave Day wrote: Is this supposed to work this way? I've just spent a bit of time in the Init Tuning Reference, and nothing in there indicates what I'm seeing. On a z/OS 1.12 system, if the SMFPRM member has NOACTIVE set, my IEFACTRT exit is not invoked. When I set it to ACTIVE, it is.

Re: SMFPRMxx ACTIVE/NOACTIVE parameter and SMF exit IEFACTRT

2011-11-10 Thread Ford Prefect
To reinforce what I said earlier: http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2E4B0/2.21?SHELF=IEA2BKB2DT=20100701092419 The system invokes IEFACTRT only when the installation is collecting SMF record types 4, 5, 30, 32, 34, or 35. On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Ford Prefect

Re: SMFPRMxx ACTIVE/NOACTIVE parameter and SMF exit IEFACTRT

2011-11-10 Thread Rick Fochtman
--snip-- Is this supposed to work this way? I've just spent a bit of time in the Init Tuning Reference, and nothing in there indicates what I'm seeing. On a z/OS 1.12 system, if the SMFPRM member has NOACTIVE set, my

Re: SMFPRMxx ACTIVE/NOACTIVE parameter and SMF exit IEFACTRT

2011-11-10 Thread Ford Prefect
Rick, I don't think your method would work. If you suppress the record types that IEFACTRT is dependent on then it will not be called. If you want the exit to be called but not have the records recorded I think you would have to exclude them with IEFU8x. Scott On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:14 PM,

Re: SMFPRMxx ACTIVE/NOACTIVE parameter and SMF exit IEFACTRT

2011-11-10 Thread Rick Fochtman
I would think that's dependant on when the filters are applied: during collection or just before writing the completed record. You may be right; I just don't know with a high-enough level of certainty. Rick

Re: SMFPRMxx ACTIVE/NOACTIVE parameter and SMF exit IEFACTRT

2011-11-10 Thread Gerhard Postpischil
On 11/10/2011 4:14 PM, Rick Fochtman wrote: This is the behaviour I would expect. IEFACTRT is dependant on the data collected by SMF processing. No SMF processing means no data, therefore, no reason to even attempt invoking the exit. While irrelevant to the OP, IEFACTRT antedates SMF by a few

Re: SMFPRMxx ACTIVE/NOACTIVE parameter and SMF exit IEFACTRT

2011-11-10 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 4ebc3ed0.4040...@ync.net, on 11/10/2011 at 03:14 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net said: This is the behaviour I would expect. IEFACTRT is dependant on the data collected by SMF processing. There is a difference between SMF data collection and SMF data recording. Tying them together is,

SMFPRMxx ACTIVE/NOACTIVE parameter and SMF exit IEFACTRT

2011-11-09 Thread Dave Day
Is this supposed to work this way? I've just spent a bit of time in the Init Tuning Reference, and nothing in there indicates what I'm seeing. On a z/OS 1.12 system, if the SMFPRM member has NOACTIVE set, my IEFACTRT exit is not invoked. When I set it to ACTIVE, it is. Only change I

Re: SMFPRMxx ACTIVE/NOACTIVE parameter and SMF exit IEFACTRT

2011-11-09 Thread Linda Mooney
...@consolidated.net To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2011 3:30:25 PM Subject: SMFPRMxx ACTIVE/NOACTIVE parameter and SMF exit IEFACTRT     Is this supposed to work this way?  I've just spent a bit of time in the Init Tuning Reference, and nothing in there indicates what I'm seeing

Re: SMFPRMxx ACTIVE/NOACTIVE parameter and SMF exit IEFACTRT

2011-11-09 Thread Ford Prefect
When you specify NOACTIVE, the system does not record any SMF data, therefor it does not call any exits related to those records. On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Dave Day david...@consolidated.net wrote: Is this supposed to work this way? I've just spent a bit of time in the Init Tuning