Chris Mason wrote:
The key word here may be exit.
I will avoid talking about VTAM exit, because I never have any experience with
it...
I have no experience with RACF exits but I do - or used to - with VTAM
exits - and those of some related products. My understanding of an exit is
that it is
I've received a call from a colleague and he saids me that it's no necessary to
define a new xcf group because, when we start the new address spaces in
the new version with the new xcf group, the new group appears in sysplex.
That's right, but now, when we start the new address spaces appears
Chris Mason wrote:
Bill
The key word here may be exit.
(much snippage..)
Thus, given the assumptions above, it is no surprise to me that RACF have
not revisited the supplied assumed to be *sample* exit in order to ensure it
conforms to the best coding practices probably several years on
Hi folks
What’s the difference between AUDIT and GLOBALAUDIT? As it looks like you can
specify both on a dataset profile, which should I go for? Or both even?
(For this purpose I’m trying to see if the profiles are being used, so I know
whether I can get rid of them. But I also have a second
Bri P wrote:
Hi folks
What’s the difference between AUDIT and GLOBALAUDIT? As it looks like you can
specify both on a dataset profile, which should I go for? Or both even?
(For this purpose I’m trying to see if the profiles are being used, so I know
whether I can get rid of them. But I also
Ok, thanks Radoslaw.
I'll just use the AUDIT options, it will be consistent then.
Thanks again
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET
Hi ,
We have come across a slight problem.
There is an existing table named 'Material' and it has one foreign key.
The foreign key has been named 'FK_MaterialLoc'. The problem is that
the foreign key needs to reference
two independent columns in two separate tables.
The first table is called
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:40:17 -0600, Jorge Garcia jgarc...@mapfre.com wrote:
Hello:
We are installing a new CICS version (3.2) and we need to add a new XCF
group for the address spaces of this new version. The address spaces of
actual version (2.2) are working with DFHIR000 but now we want to
Ensure the latest level of DFHIRP is in the LPA. Easy way is to invoke
TSO ISRDDN command LOAD DFHIRP, enter and scroll back. 650 means CTS
3.2
*DFH
IRP ih÷.0650I.â
..UK30311 ..CICS
Roland
I've received a call from a colleague and he saids me that it's no necessary to
define a
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:08:51 -0600, Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com
wrote:
We use the command:
setxcf modify,classdef,class=default,addgroup=(DFHIR000,DFHIR032)
We can't use the command setxcf start because the default class exists yet.
The modify is right but when we start the new
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:52:37 -0600, Jorge Garcia jgarc...@mapfre.com wrote:
I've received a call from a colleague and he saids me that it's no necessary to
define a new xcf group because, when we start the new address spaces in
the new version with the new xcf group, the new group appears in
We are in the middle of converting form OS/390 2.10 to Z/OS 1.9 and ran into a
FTP problem
We are able to FTP to a tape drive on our current system, however when we FTP
to a tape drive on the Z/OS 1.9 system we get the following
Error (error code 0218 info code S99ERSN 0FD6)
Any help
Sabo, Frank wrote:
We are in the middle of converting form OS/390 2.10 to Z/OS 1.9 and ran into
a FTP problem
We are able to FTP to a tape drive on our current system, however when we FTP
to a tape drive on the Z/OS 1.9 system we get the following
Error (error code 0218 info code
This is a dynamic allocation failure.
Dynamic allocation error codes are described in MVS Programming:
Authorized
Assembler Services Guide Document Number SA22-7608-13 (z//OS 1.10)
The 0218 Specified volume or an acceptable volume is not mounted, and
user does not have volume mounting
I'm using Shopzseries for the first time this year but when I try to upload
a new installed software report I get the following -
SZOI01a: 0032: The specified file is not a valid installed software report.
so I tried with a file that I had previously uploaded successfully and got
the same error.
We are able to FTP to a tape drive on our current system, however when we
FTP to a tape drive on the Z/OS 1.9 system we get the following
Error (error code 0218 info code S99ERSN 0FD6)
The 0218 error code indicates the user may not have MOUNT authority. Check
the TSO/E customization
Yep, it's changed.
Check the tip on the right side. Provides JCL: The pgm has changed as
below
//STEP1EXEC PGM=GIMXSID,PARM='WAIT=10MIN,L=ENU'
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SMPOUT DD SYSOUT=*
I would also look in syslog at the time of this failure for any additional
messages for the dsn
PWH99O.DATA.RPFILE.NOT.GDG.G2068V00
That might also indicate the problem.
FYI - The Dynamic allocation codes can be found in ISPF by issue HELP; HELP;
Index, then go to D1 in the panels. Simple
Hi all,
I want to use lpr command to send a z/OS file (FB 80) to a TCPIP network
printer.
I suppose the conversion from EBCDIC to ASCII should be default. However, it
didn't work (up to now, I can only to convert the file into ASCII first then
using 'binary' option and send to network
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:29:19 +0200, e'Silva, Joaquim J
joaquim.esi...@standardbank.co.za wrote:
Yep, it's changed.
Check the tip on the right side. Provides JCL: The pgm has changed as
below
//STEP1EXEC PGM=GIMXSID,PARM='WAIT=10MIN,L=ENU'
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SMPOUT DD SYSOUT=*
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:29 PM, e'Silva, Joaquim J
joaquim.esi...@standardbank.co.za wrote:
Yep, it's changed.
Check the tip on the right side. Provides JCL: The pgm has changed as
below
//STEP1EXEC PGM=GIMXSID,PARM='WAIT=10MIN,L=ENU'
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SMPOUT DD SYSOUT=*
I would think that the printer definition using LPRSET would only last the
duration of the TSO session. That you probably have to reissue the command
should you log off and then back on.
Lizette
Hi all,
I want to use lpr command to send a z/OS file (FB 80) to a TCPIP network
printer.
I
Hi Mark
I think I'm in line for Wally of the year award.
I assumed that the PLX1 CF was all working and the problem was with the
PLX2.
The D XCF commands showed nothing was running on the PLX1 system after
further checking on PLX1 I found the following.
IXL013I IXLCONN REQUEST FOR
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:52:05 -0500, Lizette Koehler
stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
I would think that the printer definition using LPRSET would only last the
duration of the TSO session. That you probably have to reissue the command
should you log off and then back on.
Lizette
Oh? When I
Hi -
Try enter 'tso lpr help'
You will see this:
TRANSLATETABLE NAMESpecifies that the translate table to be used
by the client is found in the name.TCPXLBIN
data set. Xlatetable is a synonym for this
option.
So you can
Sometime after the middle of January as it would still accept the old
format. Found that in the beginning of feb it would only accept the new
format. IRRITATING
Regards
Joaquim e Silva
z/OS System Programmer
Standardbank of South Africa
email: joaquim.esi...@standardbank.co.za
(w) +27
I have read the manuals but I am still not clear on the use of automove vs.
noautomove.
My Unix envrionment on z/OS V1.9 is one system/one set of UNIX files. So, yes,
I have a lot of duplicated files.
However, from time to time I notice I will see the following message in SYSLOG
IGW026I HFS
If you files are truly system-specific then you probably want automove
unmount. Noautomove can leave the files entries in the mount table even
after the system is down. That can cause other issues should you need to
mount them on another system for problem determination or maintenance.
Jon L.
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:20:11 -0500, Lizette Koehler
stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
I have read the manuals but I am still not clear on the use of automove vs.
noautomove.
My Unix envrionment on z/OS V1.9 is one system/one set of UNIX files. So,
yes, I have a lot of duplicated files.
However,
Greetings,
I came across a weird situation late last week. I tried to reply to a
post
via the web interface and our netnanny software blocked it. I E-Mailed
our
security folks to ask why and they said they got an updated blacklist
that
classifies bama.ua.edu under the category of Alcohol. I
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:01:17 -0800, Skip Robinson
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com wrote:
I gather from other posts that XCFLOCAL would still work in an emergency
where a broken couple data set made sysplex or monoplex impossible. On the
other hand, in 15 years of running parallel sysplexes, I can't
The new way has been available for a while but the old one seize to work since
ShopZ upgrade during end of Janurary '09.
Natarajan
Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com 2/17/2009 7:46 AM
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:29:19 +0200, e'Silva, Joaquim J
joaquim.esi...@standardbank.co.za wrote:
Yep, it's
Kinda, in reverse. One of my new team mates, tried to subscribe to
IBM-MAIN via the web interface. The confirmation email never shows up.
Then tried to send the subscription request by email. My email team
here traced the email outbound from our site, and BAMA.EDU accepted the
email, but never
Has anyone on this list ported the free g95 Fortran compiler available
at g95.org to a z/OS system ?
If this is not the appropriate list can you please direct me to the
correct listserv.
Lorne Dudley
Queen's University
Kingston, Ontario
CANADA
It is documented that this setting is remembered in LASTING.GLOBALV.
You can change the setting with LPRSET.
Bill
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:05:58 -0600, Paul Ip paul...@boci.com.hk wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:52:05 -0500, Lizette Koehler
stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
I would think that the
Lorne Dudley wrote:
Has anyone on this list ported the free g95 Fortran compiler available
at g95.org to a z/OS system ?
There is a yahoo group hercules-os380 with a working gcc
compiler and matching pdpclib. While it's a work in progress,
you might want to see if that works for you. Both
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
You know better than that.
Actually I don't. I was working on a project that had a ForTran
main program with some assembler subroutines, that needed
porting from a 7094 to another machine. The only change I recall
is having to test for -0, and for some reason
John,
I am sure you will find the SETPROG command or someone on the list will
respond on that issue. But my concern would be why didn't it load?
Did it ABEND?
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of John Norgauer
Sent:
SDSF seemed to allow me to issue these commands on our test LPAR
against Unix System Services jobs with status PROT from the DA display:
- The K line command from the DA display generated a C jobname.STEP1 which
was failed by MVS because of the STEP1.
- The C command from the DA display generated
Spamming can cause this. Once, a long time ago, a customer was unable to
receive any email from me. We found out that their site was automatically
blocking all email from IBM because they said they had been spammed from
our domain. I don't know if there had really been an infected machine
I don't know if there had really been an infected machine inside IBM, or if
somebody outside had just successfully spoofed the
sending domain.
This is one of the problems with automated solutions!
A site as reputable as IBM should not have been blocked.
There MUST be some human over-sight.
We are a JES2 shop, z/OS 1.8 going to 1.10.
We have two production LPARS in a parallel sysplex.
CLASS=A work can run on either lpar
Because the job scheduling package runs on only one lpar is tends
overload its lpar.
We've tried to manage the number of inits manually to balance
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:19:29 -0600, Field, Alan C.
alan.c.fi...@supervalu.com wrote:
We are a JES2 shop, z/OS 1.8 going to 1.10.
We have two production LPARS in a parallel sysplex.
CLASS=A work can run on either lpar
Because the job scheduling package runs on only one lpar is tends
That is correct, Roy. I was not complaining about a sample exit. The exit
is mine and mine alone. I was complaining about supported macros to call
z/OS system services.
Bill
Roy Hewitt ibm-m...@frozen.eclipse.co.uk wrote in message
news:499a9905.6000...@frozen.eclipse.co.uk...
Chris Mason
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:28:58 -0700, Roger Bolan rbo...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Spamming can cause this. Once, a long time ago, a customer was unable to
receive any email from me. We found out that their site was automatically
blocking all email from IBM because they said they had been spammed from
I'm impressed.
I'm not sure what your point is, but you've made it!
--Original Message--
From: Ted Mac Neil
To: m...@yahoo
Sent: Feb 17, 2009 18:29
Subject: Should this be blocked ?
Should this mail be blocked ?
Is it coming from IBM ?
This a test Ted :-))
Bruno Sugliani
-
Too busy
I have th 5 lpars. Each one has its own set of OMVS datasets.
For example Lpar1 has SYS1.OMVS.ROOT.LPAR1, SYS1.OMVS.JV390.LPAR1,
SYS1.OMVS.SGIYROOT.LPAR1 and so on.
Lpar2 has a duplicate set of files that end with LPAR2 rather LPAR1
And so forth.
I see in syslog that the LPAR2 gets an IGW026I
How / why is LPAR2 trying to mount LPAR1's files? Do you have them defined in
BPXPRMxx? That is allowed if they are mounted read only on both LPARs
(which would create a SHR ENQ in SYSZDSN and not EXCL). Or is someone
manually trying to mount them?
If they are cross defined as R/W, then it's
I have discovered we have been experiencing high disconnect time to most our
LCUs/DASDs due to NORMAL/RANDOM read CACHE misses (only 50% hit ratio). I
have read somewhere that NORMAL read normally is not recommended for CACHING
and was suggested to be excluded. My question is have anyone here
For what is worth I did see there's a company which provides master catalog
mcnvtcat type services.
http://www.systemsprogramminginc.com/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
At 20:58 -0600 on 02/17/2009, Walt Farrell wrote about Re: How
Official are Supplied Sample Exits? (was Assemble:
On the other hand, with your RACROUTE example that one BALR is going to
invoke a set of routines that will usually execute at least several thousand
other instructions, possibly
51 matches
Mail list logo
