On 9/13/2011 12:26 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
I wouldn't say that. I'm not aware of a case where a delinker will
silently produce an object deck that doesn't match the load module.
Back in the sixties I ran into a problem with a module that had
several CSECTs from a single assembly. DELINK0
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:25:36 -0400, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
Back in the sixties I ran into a problem with a module that had
several CSECTs from a single assembly. DELINK0 appeared to work
correctly, but the linker forced one of the names to a
double-word boundary which it hadn't been before. I
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Gerhard Postpischil
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 9:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Object modules
On 9/13/2011 12:26 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
I wouldn't say that. I'm not aware of a case where a delinker
Thanks for all the responses. Good information.
The intention was to create the object module then use CMS ZAPTEXT
to update it then use the result in a SMPE PTF ++MOD statement.
From what I am hearing the delinkers are old and may not produce
an accurate object.
The programs in question
On 13 September 2011 07:23, Bill Hecox bill.he...@mail.com wrote:
Thanks for all the responses. Good information.
The intention was to create the object module then use CMS ZAPTEXT
to update it then use the result in a SMPE PTF ++MOD statement.
Ayee...
Could you not ZAP load modules using
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:26:45 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
The intention was to create the object module then use CMS ZAPTEXT
to update it then use the result in a SMPE PTF ++MOD statement.
Could you not ZAP load modules using AMASPZAP, and then use ++PROGRAM
in SMP/E? I realize that this may
This may or may not be of help. Rather than worrying about object decks you
could dis-assemble the csect in question. I think the high level assembler may
do this if not there is a disassembler, on the cbt tape.
Ed
--
For
The ASMDASM disassembler component of the HLASM Toolkit Feature
can reconstruct object modules from (a) load modules, (b) program
objects, (c) CMS modules, and (d) VSE phases. It is described in
the HLASM Toolkit User's Guide, GC26-8710, Chapter 3.
It has been available since December 1995
Hi,
Has anyone heard of a utility that can re-create object modules from a load
module?
Is this even possible?
Thanks,
Bill
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu
in question and create
an object deck from the dis-assembled source code.
HTH,
snip
Has anyone heard of a utility that can re-create object modules from a
load module?
Is this even possible?
/snip
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:13:17 -0500, Bill Hecox wrote:
Has anyone heard of a utility that can re-create object modules from a load
module?
Is this even possible?
You should be able to get a delinker from cbttape.org. What's your
underlying motivation?
-- gil
by the Binder than are object modules.
I hope that you have no notion of modifying object modules; but if you do,
don't do it.
John Gilmore Ashland, MA 01721-1817 USA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Long long ago IBM had let private se hands under the table a program called
delink0 ( yes zero) cbttape also has one if memory seves me. The IBM version
probably won#39;t work. With program objest and if I recall correctly it
didn#39;t work with some(most) of the newer options like overlay
In 0629061002524257.wa.bill.hecoxmail@bama.ua.edu, on 09/12/2011
at 03:13 PM, Bill Hecox bill.he...@mail.com said:
Has anyone heard of a utility that can re-create object modules from
a load module?
There are delink utilities on the CBT tape. If you need to extract
sections from a program
On 12 September 2011 16:13, Bill Hecox bill.he...@mail.com wrote:
Has anyone heard of a utility that can re-create object modules from a load
module?
Yes, indeed. The traditional program was the FE tool known as DELINK
or DELINK0. This is very old (1960s), was never supplied as part of
any
On 12 September 2011 19:23, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
Query; is there anything to build, e.g., GOFF, from program objects?
I've never met one, but the Binder API contains sufficient function to
retrieve all there is to a Program Object, and the GOFF format is
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 21:36:15 +, john gilmore wrote:
Paul Gilmartin's implicit question ...
Implicit? OK. I suppose it would have been (slightly) more explicit
to ask what may be the OP's intended use of object modules that
might not be likewise satisfied by load modules? (Inline SMP/E
I could wish that he had used slightly different language, but there is an
important sense in which Paul Gilmartin's
I believe that the boundaries of the input object modules are not preserved in
the load module . . .
is entirely correct. These discontinuities are more important for GOFFs
18 matches
Mail list logo
