Re: [ilugd] indic in mails

2005-09-05 Thread abhay
Pankaj kaushal wrote: Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: On Sunday 04 Sep 2005 8:29 pm, Raj Mathur wrote: Not really. Kenneth's mail composition client does not line wrap UTF8 messages properly not correct. your mail client cannot render *any* mail with indic in it. Kenneth's fault is not in his

Re: [ilugd] indic in mails

2005-09-05 Thread Abhijit Menon-Sen
At 2005-09-05 00:53:14 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kenneth's: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Interesting. In my copies of all of Kenneth's message headers, I see the Content-Transfer-Encoding is not 8bit, but base64

Re: [ilugd] indic in mails

2005-09-04 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Sunday 04 Sep 2005 10:56 am, Raj Mathur wrote: Kenneth == Kenneth Gonsalves [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Kenneth On Saturday 03 Sep 2005 10:50 pm, Raj Mathur wrote: Unfortunately my mail client isn't Indic-enabled, so both your and Kenneth's mail are still being received as

Re: [ilugd] indic in mails

2005-09-04 Thread Abhijit Menon-Sen
At 2005-09-04 19:00:36 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but the point is, how long should we pander to CLI ppl? Don't be silly. The point is about fixing one specific problem. Your MUA is sending (as far as I can tell) properly-encoded UTF-8 text in a perfectly acceptable fashion. If Raju's MUA

Re: [ilugd] indic in mails

2005-09-04 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Sunday 04 Sep 2005 8:10 pm, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: Spouting ad hominem rubbish does not strengthen your case, particularly not when essentially the same thing has been said about the dying breed of Unix people. just a joke - no intention to start a flame war, consider it withdrawn --

Re: [ilugd] indic in mails

2005-09-04 Thread Raj Mathur
ams == Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ams At 2005-09-04 19:00:36 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but the point is, how long should we pander to CLI ppl? ams Don't be silly. The point is about fixing one specific ams problem. ams Your MUA is sending (as far as

Re: [ilugd] indic in mails

2005-09-04 Thread Abhijit Menon-Sen
At 2005-09-04 20:29:41 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kenneth's mail composition client does not line wrap UTF8 messages properly -- the whole message is one long line, which is why my mail client doesn't render it properly. When I decoded the base64 body of his messages, I did not get one

Re: [ilugd] indic in mails

2005-09-04 Thread Raj Mathur
ams == Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ams At 2005-09-04 20:29:41 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kenneth's mail composition client does not line wrap UTF8 messages properly -- the whole message is one long line, which is why my mail client doesn't render it

Re: [ilugd] indic in mails

2005-09-04 Thread Pankaj kaushal
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: On Sunday 04 Sep 2005 8:29 pm, Raj Mathur wrote: Not really. Kenneth's mail composition client does not line wrap UTF8 messages properly not correct. your mail client cannot render *any* mail with indic in it. Kenneth's fault is not in his mail client, but in

Re: [ilugd] indic in mails

2005-09-03 Thread Sandip Bhattacharya
On Saturday, 3 Sep 2005 1:07 am, Linux Lingam wrote: [snip] i am using gmail, via firefox, on gnulinux. i see ?? characters in your sig. could you please share with me how to enable indic-support here? While your viewing the indic enabled mails require an indic enabled distro, you can

Re: [ilugd] indic in mails

2005-09-03 Thread Raj Mathur
Sandip == Sandip Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sandip On Saturday, 3 Sep 2005 1:07 am, Linux Lingam wrote: Sandip [snip] i am using gmail, via firefox, on gnulinux. i see Sandip ?? characters in your sig. could you please share Sandip with me how to enable

Re: [ilugd] indic in mails

2005-09-03 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Saturday 03 Sep 2005 10:50 pm, Raj Mathur wrote: Sandip == Sandip Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Unfortunately my mail client isn't Indic-enabled, so both your and Kenneth's mail are still being received as unformatted. Kenneth had mentioned he had figured out a way to fix that

Re: [ilugd] indic in mails

2005-09-03 Thread Raj Mathur
Kenneth == Kenneth Gonsalves [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Kenneth On Saturday 03 Sep 2005 10:50 pm, Raj Mathur wrote: Unfortunately my mail client isn't Indic-enabled, so both your and Kenneth's mail are still being received as unformatted. Kenneth had mentioned he had figured

Re: [ilugd] indic in mails

2005-09-03 Thread Sandip Bhattacharya
On Saturday, 3 Sep 2005 10:50 pm, Raj Mathur wrote: Unfortunately my mail client isn't Indic-enabled, so both your and Kenneth's mail are still being received as unformatted. Kenneth had mentioned he had figured out a way to fix that for text-based clients, so you may want to try that setting

Re: [ilugd] indic in mails

2005-09-02 Thread Linux Lingam
[snip] i am using gmail, via firefox, on gnulinux. i see ?? characters in your sig. could you please share with me how to enable indic-support here? tia. :-) LL ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org

Re: [ilugd] indic in mails

2005-09-02 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Saturday 03 Sep 2005 1:07 am, Linux Lingam wrote: [snip] i am using gmail, via firefox, on gnulinux. i see ?? characters in your sig. could you please share with me how to enable indic-support here? what distro? if you are seeing ?? it means that you dont have utf8 on your system