[IMGate] Re: Malware Boom Puts Pressure on AV Labs

2007-10-05 Thread Bonno Bloksma
Hi, http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,138033/article.html?tk=nl_dnxnws From my experience, I don't think malware or viruses are coming primarily through email anymore, since our low-volume system has seen a huge drop off of viruses caught by Kaspersky (updated twice daily) from the

[IMGate] Ignoring transport and relay_recipient

2007-10-05 Thread Todd
We have a couple domains that we wash email for then forward from our IMail server to their Exchange servers. Their email does not go through the IMGate server currently but goes directly to our IMail server bypassing the IMGate mx because I am using relay_recipeints and transport maps. These

[IMGate] Re: Ignoring transport and relay_recipient

2007-10-05 Thread Len Conrad
Is there a place that I can list their domains in the Postfix system so that it ignores the transport map there's no way to bypass transport.map. It's part of the domain resolution process of transport.map, hosts, DNS and relay_recipients restrictions whitelist the domain before

[IMGate] Re: Ignoring transport and relay_recipient

2007-10-05 Thread Todd
Thanks Len, Ok so I cant get around the transport map. I would think the next logical thing would be to try and add the domains I want to the transport map after its exported from IMail. Or is there another way to do this? Not being well versed in unix commands is there a way that I can modify

[IMGate] Re: Ignoring transport and relay_recipient

2007-10-05 Thread Todd
Btw I understand about the bounces and bad IMail recipients. When I was running without relay recipients it was Ugly and the utilization was so much higher. But one of the domains we wash for is the biggest recipient/target for spam on our system. I would really like to offload some of that

[IMGate] Re: Ignoring transport and relay_recipient

2007-10-05 Thread Len Conrad
I would think the next logical thing would be to try and add the domains I want to the transport map after its exported from IMail. Or is there another way to do this? you can have mutlitple files input to transport_maps = hash:/path/to/file1 hash:/path/to/file2 they are searched in

[IMGate] Re: Ignoring transport and relay_recipient

2007-10-05 Thread Todd
I went with your suggestion and added a second transport map with the washed domains. I also did the same for the relay recipients adding a 2nd map with wildcards. The gateway is now processing email for the washed domains and everything is working good. I plan in the future to get email