Re: [indiana-discuss] Cannot activate BE

2009-01-28 Thread Cindy . Swearingen
Hi Sebastien, You can test booting from the second disk just by selecting the second disk to boot at the BIOS level. You can review this error scenario and other ZFS troubleshooting issues, here: http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Troubleshooting_Guide Not everything in this wi

Re: [indiana-discuss] Cannot activate BE

2009-01-28 Thread Sébastien Stormacq
Hello Cindy, Looks like everything went fine this tile. Thanks for the detailed procedure. Just one last question : how to check the boot on the second disk (step 7) ? Is it as simple as removing my primary disk from the pool and reboot ? or a more complex procedure ? Thanks Seb --- Sébastien

Re: [indiana-discuss] Cannot activate BE

2009-01-26 Thread Cindy . Swearingen
Hi Sebastien, I've outlined steps below to help you recovery from the label problem. Make sure you can boot from the primary disk, c4t0d0s0, before you begin. I've reproduced these steps correctly on my Nevada, build 104 system because my OpenSolaris system doesn't have two disks. An easier reco

Re: [indiana-discuss] Cannot activate BE

2009-01-24 Thread George Koutras
ore From: Sébastien Stormacq To: Evan Layton Cc: "indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org" Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 12:24:50 PM Subject: Re: [indiana-discuss] Cannot activate BE Hello, I tried that already format shows only a Solaris partition. I did label the disk too

Re: [indiana-discuss] Cannot activate BE

2009-01-24 Thread Sébastien Stormacq
Hello, I tried that already format shows only a Solaris partition. I did label the disk too but r...@yajug:~# zpool attach rpool mirror c4t1d0 cannot label 'c4t1d0': EFI labeled devices are not supported on root pools. Seb --- Sébastien Stormacq Senior Software Architect GSS Software Practi

Re: [indiana-discuss] Cannot activate BE

2009-01-23 Thread Evan Layton
Try running format, choose that disk, run fdisk and remove the EFI fdisk partition and create a Solaris partition. Then in format label the disk. -evan Sébastien Stormacq wrote: > OK will try this > Any suggestion to repartition ? I can't remind the exact errors but it > seems that fdisk is no

Re: [indiana-discuss] Cannot activate BE

2009-01-23 Thread Sébastien Stormacq
OK will try this Any suggestion to repartition ? I can't remind the exact errors but it seems that fdisk is not happy at all with the EFI partition :-( thanks --- Sébastien Stormacq Senior Software Architect GSS Software Practice, Sun Microsystems Luxembourg On 23 Jan 2009, at 23:26, Evan Lay

Re: [indiana-discuss] Cannot activate BE

2009-01-23 Thread Evan Layton
On Jan 23, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Sébastien Stormacq wrote: > Evan, > > Using BE_PRINT_ERR=true (instead of 1 ;-) gives one more line that > point to the error > > s...@yajug:~# beadm activate opensolaris-1 > be_do_installgrub: installgrub failed for device c4t1d0s2. > > > c4t1d0s2 is a mirror in m

Re: [indiana-discuss] Cannot activate BE

2009-01-23 Thread Sébastien Stormacq
Evan, Using BE_PRINT_ERR=true (instead of 1 ;-) gives one more line that point to the error s...@yajug:~# beadm activate opensolaris-1 be_do_installgrub: installgrub failed for device c4t1d0s2. c4t1d0s2 is a mirror in my zpool s...@yajug:~# zpool status pool: rpool state: ONLINE scrub

Re: [indiana-discuss] Cannot activate BE

2009-01-23 Thread Sébastien Stormacq
Thanks Brock, Here it is s...@yajug:~# export BE_PRINT_ERR=1 s...@yajug:~# beadm activate opensolaris-1 Unable to activate opensolaris-1. Unknown external error. s...@yajug:~# zfs list NAMEUSED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT rpool 7.43G 59.5G 72

Re: [indiana-discuss] Cannot activate BE

2009-01-23 Thread Evan Layton
Sébastien Stormacq wrote: > Hello, > > I installed OpenSolaris 2008.11 on a Sun v40z machine. > Unfortunately the build I use, although being 101b was not the latest > one, i.e. it was a couple of hours before GA : > Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.11 snv_101bNovember 2008 > > I tr

Re: [indiana-discuss] Cannot activate BE

2009-01-23 Thread Brock Pytlik
First thing to try is setting BE_PRINT_ERR=1 then running the beadm activate command again. If that doesn't make things clear, please show us the output of beadm list and zfs list, and then perhaps trying running truss on beadm activate. Hope that helps, Brock Sébastien Stormacq wrote: > Hello