KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
lamb...@lambertfam.org
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
/ Kari Hurtta
In our configuration the set of users that can receive mail locally is
the contents of the assign file.
Messages are passed to deliver via the users' .qmail files.
The transformation of the Return-Path happens after qmail has
handed off the message to cyrus for final delivery.
We
Okay, we just did that and we are still having problems. Mail can be
delivered to the INBOX just fine, but a user+mbox@address causes a
user unknown error and bounces the message back.
That is quite natural because user+something does not exists on passwd.
I think that you can not write
Subject: [Cyrus imapd 2.0.12] STORE xxx FLAGS ()
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 23:14:32 +0300 (EEST)
Have I read RFC 2060 wrong ?
I have understand that commands such as
STORE 132 FLAGS ()
is valid.
Specially grammar of RFC 2060 gives:
store
Hi all,
I'm running hier FreeBSD 4.3 Release an I installed Cyrus-imapd with mysql
auth.
Right now I'm testing the sending of mails to local mailboxes of cyrus, but
it doesn't work.
Everytime I send an message I got the following failure message:
Jul 27 16:58:05 test
Why is this? None of the MTAs I've tested are case sensitive in the
local-part
of the address. I regularly recieve mail to my account in a mix of cases
and it
comes through fine.
For example Sendmail can be case sensitive in the local-part of the address.
/ Kari Hurtta
imtest produces this line in /var/log/messages
Jul 16 09:17:20 pico master[692]: process 698 exited, signaled to death by
11
(as of now this is the only error message i've been able to produce in my
logs).
If 11 is signal number, then it looks bad:
[hurtta@leija ~]$ grep 11
