>
> Hello internals!
>
> The RFC that proposes adding retry functionality to the
> `try/catch/finally` block is now officially "under discussion".
>
This feature seems like something that would be extremely useful. However,
the proposed syntax for the number of retries for a block level seems to
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 5:20 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
>
> Please review the RFC https://wiki.php.net/rfc/async_signals
I do not like the idea of introducing this via an INI directive, what might
be of value is to have a behavior on the function recommendation
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Sara Golemon wrote:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rfc.third-party-editing
>
> Let's make RFCs more useful before AND after voting!
>
Yes please! It certainly would make it far easier to see the arguments for
and against and have a history of
On Dec 30, 2015 5:29 PM, "Davey Shafik" wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> In the PR for adding HTTP/2 Server Push support to curl, Julien raises the
> question of adding tests for this feature [1].
>
> This is currently very difficult.
>
> While we have the cli-server, it currently only
Hello Yasuo,
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> > I would like to restart better session management for PHP 7.1.
> >
> >
Lester,
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
> On 09/12/15 16:24, Rowan Collins wrote:
> >> So as somebody already said, maybe your code or setup is really busted.
> >
> > Really busted, or spending all its time in a type of operation that ZE3
> > can't
Hello Internals,
I had requested a wiki account (mwillbanks) as I would like to propose an
RFC on Object casts to scalar types. This has previously been discussed
prior to scalar type hints and since we have those now coming into PHP 7, I
believe it would be a great time to take a look at this
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi Netroby,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Netroby hufeng1...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the in support this kind of php code ?
```php
?php
$arr = ['a', 'b', 'c'];
for ($v in $arr) {
echo $v;
}
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi all,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Dennis Birkholz den...@birkholz.biz
wrote:
Am 16.03.2015 um 06:28 schrieb Xinchen Hui:
lib.php
?php
declare(strict_types = 1);
function
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
Hi, I’d like to start vote on RFC:continue_ob — any objections?
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/continue_ob https://wiki.php.net/rfc/continue_ob
I think it would be good to put an example of why this is immensely useful
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Adrian Parker
i.am.hidden.somewh...@gmail.com wrote:
Seeing it makes me vomit, IMHO.
Seeing $var = [] makes me vomit, IMHO.
This is just a proposal, I know next to nothing about core PHP development.
On a serious note, this would never happen. The
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Dan Ackroyd dan...@basereality.com
wrote:
On 26 February 2015 at 17:48, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
From: Theodore Brown [mailto:theodor...@outlook.com]
2. Strict types are important in some cases.
I would *want* any value with the wrong
Anthony,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com
wrote:
Mike,
One point of clarification:
This is true, however, the types that you are receiving back form a
multitude of data sources might be in a mixed format (databases for
example
often provide
Zeev,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mike Willbanks [mailto:pen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:46 PM
To: Anthony Ferrara
Cc: Dan Ackroyd; Zeev Suraski; Theodore Brown; internals@lists.php.net
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mike Willbanks [mailto:pen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 10:43 PM
To: Zeev Suraski
Cc: PHP Internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] A different user perspective on scalar type
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Philip Sturgeon pjsturg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Good day!
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/anonymous_classes
There's a little RFC + patch that Joe Watkins put together, and as
before with the ArrayOf RFC, I'll be helping out.
So, lets get this discussion rolling.
It
Hello,
I'm writing this as an author and maintainer of a framework and many
libraries.
Caveat, for those who aren't already aware: I work for Zend, and report to
Zeev.
If you feel that will make my points impartial, please feel free to stop
reading, but I do think my points on STH bear some
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 3 Feb 2015, at 14:49, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
On 03/02/15 14:03, Andrea Faulds wrote:
But I don’t consider 0.25MB extra to be such a problem in practice. The
PHP binary is already huge, and every system
Hello Pierre, Andrea and Niklas,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 20 Jan 2015, at 03:30, Mike Willbanks pen...@gmail.com wrote:
I am very familiar with the in operator. However
to see the scope of the conversation.
Regards,
Mike
2015-01-20 10:41 GMT-03:00 Mike Willbanks pen...@gmail.com:
Hello Pierre, Andrea and Niklas,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote
Hello Niklas,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Niklas Keller m...@kelunik.com wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to propose a new feature to PHP: The in Operator
Bob mentioned a few weeks ago he wants such an operator in PHP and today I
stumbled over
Hello Andrea,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Hey Levi,
Upon further thought, I’m not super-enthusiastic about this. As has been
pointed out, it’s a pretty serious BC break, whether code can be
automatically updated or not. PHP 4 constructors may be
Hi Andrea,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:28 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Good morning,
This is a reboot of Davey Shafik’s RFC (with permission). After recent
discussions about sort functions, I was inspired to bring this back up, as
I think it would be a useful feature.
The RFC is
Hello Andrea,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Hi Zeev,
On 15 Jan 2015, at 11:56, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
Andrea,
I'm not sure what you're basing that assumption on. The incidental
interactions you (or anybody) may have with 'the
Hi Andrea,
On 15 Jan 2015, at 16:55, Mike Willbanks pen...@gmail.com wrote:
I actually quite disagree with that statement.
I don’t understand. I said either approach to scalar hints will upset a
large portion of the community”. Are you not demonstrating that point, in
that you don’t
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
Hi internals!
I'd like to propose removing support for hexadecimal strings in the
is_numeric_string() function, in order to achieve consistency with ordinary
integer and float casts:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de
wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 17:05 +0100, Mathias Grimm wrote:
Hi,
I would like to suggest something for php like a class I am using
https://github.com/mathiasgrimm/arraypath
The reason is to access arrays like
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Ingwie Phoenix ingwie2...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Am 03.10.2014 um 19:38 schrieb Levi Morrison le...@php.net:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Thomas Gossmann m...@gossimaniac.net
wrote:
Hey there,
I'm just a php developer, thus not even having a
Hi!
No, no it would not. PHP’s explicit casts cannot fail, and there is
absolutely no good reason to change this. If people want strict
casting, we can add new functions or operators for that specifically.
But to break explicit casts and make them sometimes fail would cause
innumerable
First off, I realize I am top posting but this thread is becoming extremely
off-topic, unbalanced and overall ridiculous to see from the sidelines as
someone that contributes to open source and also utilizes PHP on a daily
basis for more than the last decade.
Seriously, cut the shit! Everyone is
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Hi all,
There isn't any good counter measure session hijack.
However, we can regenerate session ID if IP address has changed.
Hijacked users might notice that they have been logged out if session
ID is regenerated by attackers. Therefore,
Hello Jeremy,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Jeremy Curcio j.cur...@icloud.com wrote:
Hello,
I would like to submit an RFC to add a new function to the PHP language.
The function would be called map(). The purpose of this function would be
to take an existing value within a range and
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On 04/02/2013 07:52 PM, Sara Golemon wrote:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php-array-api
Very nice. I would love to see more of the API simplified for common
tasks like this. It is a macro jungle currently.
-Rasmus
Coming from a mostly
thank you! It is a useful feature to me.
class MyBitmask {
const POS_1 = 1;
//const POS_2 = 2;// reserved/undefined
//const POS_3 = 3;// reserved/undefined
const POS_4 = 4;
I'm developing software with PHP since version 2 and i'm still easily
I am simply suggesting an alternative to using Reflection whereas:
get_class_constants([object|**string]);
get_object_constants([object])**;
Do we need both; probably not; the first would likely do.
+1 for the first one only
Am 27.02.2013 16:12, Analyst (Frank Schenk) trolled:
Hello All,
Before drafting an RFC I would like to gauge interest in adding:
get_object_constants and get_class_constants
Currently this can only be done through ReflectionClass which is far slower
than retrieving them directly from the constants table. Some simple
timings show that through
Before drafting an RFC I would like to gauge interest in adding:
get_object_constants and get_class_constants
I have already drafted up a PR with the changes and supplemental data:
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/292
You took the time to make a PR, but not an RFC? This should
Hello All,
The reference issues I previously noted were mostly about unset not being a
proper write context when the ZE is tricked into thinking it is a
reference; this is used for both write and read write but not unset.
This causes countless issues where you are unable to unset a
Hello Again,
I wanted to bring back the topic I started on ArrayObject; I've been doing
a ton of work with ArrayObject lately and finding some odd behavior.
Firstly it would be great to know if these are by design or bugs.
Secondly there are some areas where it likely needs to be improved.
1:
Hello,
Already answered before. Performance is important. A native C
implementation is much faster than a PHP code implementation.
Well, that's always a safe assumption. But a shiny benchmark would be
useful in this review.
Interesting hard fact would to be know if -for the overall
/splclassloader
I'm not 100% sure the patch still works since it's been over 1 year
since it was proposed... =\
Cheers,
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
wrote:
Hi!
On 6/29/11 6:31 AM, Mike Willbanks wrote:
There's a RFC covering this. There's
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Peter Cowburn petercowb...@gmail.comwrote:
On 24 October 2011 15:57, David Coallier dav...@php.net wrote:
On 24 October 2011 16:53, Paul Dragoonis dragoo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:47 PM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com
forgot to include everyone on this response - sorry.
when building PHP using
(I) ./configure --with-mysql --with-mysqli --with-pdo-mysql
you currently get a build using the system default libmysql, usually
in /us or
such. Alternatively PHP can be built using
(II) ./configure
There's a RFC covering this. There's a patch also.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/splclassloader
This one seems to have fallen through the cracks?
I know this would benefit many of the frameworks that are out there and give
a speed bump to people utilizing them. Is this a possibility for 5.4?
*
I've gone through the GeoIP extension and ensured all of the tests now pass.
Bug Report: http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=22749
Patch File: http://blog.digitalstruct.com/patches/geoip-svn-tests.patch.txt
Also, it looks like the GeoIP extension is based on an extremely old
version, I am going
Forgot to keep the list on this one.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Mike Willbanks pen...@gmail.com wrote:
A while ago I submitted a patch to allow session_set_save_handler() to
accept a class, and support the inheritance of the default session
handler's methods.
The RFC has a more
Guilherme,
As per many of the conversations on annotations one of that hardest parts of
it is that there are generally 3 conversations going on about it when this
starts to be discussed. It seems many threads are hi-jacked and I can
understand why.
I would like to state that annotations in the
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Mike Willbanks pen...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it would be better just to fix the issue in the code. If you
run include 'My/Path/To/File.php' does it lowercase it? It does not.
The expected behavior would to not lowercase it. There are ways that
this could be fixed
13:34, Mike Willbanks wrote:
It seems like the only potential BC break is on linux if people were
using all lowercase paths. To me it would seem like this is really
not the case or would happen only sometimes.
I'd have trouble finding a single one of my apps that had a path with any
uppercase
I think it would be better just to fix the issue in the code. If you
run include 'My/Path/To/File.php' does it lowercase it? It does not.
The expected behavior would to not lowercase it. There are ways that
this could be fixed directly in the code. The only real requirement
that it looks like
1. #3 - it is much cleaner to read than the other implementations in
resolving the conflict. a different separator will be much harder to simply
see from a comparison. in a state where many people are in fact doing code
reviews and as it gets larger into big business the easier to read is going
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Janusz is damn right here. Make the patches available but do not
make it easy for people to stick to 4 please. Instead, stick to th
eplan.
We do, there are
I know they've been marked deprecated and all, but, really, what's
the cost/penalty to having a couple functions around for legacy apps?
Then we will continue to be at the same old issue of they exist, people will
continue to use them and never move away from them.
Mike
53 matches
Mail list logo