Am 20.09.2014 um 15:05 schrieb Levi Morrison:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:58 AM, thomas.gutb...@anthrotec.de wrote:
What's about Typed Arguments?
I am proposing return types which are not arguments, so that would be
too narrow.
Sorry, I have mistaken that related to the recently
discussion
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:58 AM, thomas.gutb...@anthrotec.de wrote:
Am 19.09.2014 15:21, schrieb Levi Morrison:
Anyone else have an opinion they want to voice on this?
What's about Typed Arguments?
I am proposing return types which are not arguments, so that would be
too narrow.
--
PHP
Anyone else have an opinion they want to voice on this?
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Am 19.09.2014 15:21, schrieb Levi Morrison:
Anyone else have an opinion they want to voice on this?
What's about Typed Arguments?
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi!
The general concept should be called Optional Type Declarations, to
replace “Type Hinting. They are type declarations, and they are
optional. Thus the name. For the things themselves, they’re just Type
Declarations, to replace “Type Hints. So, for example:
I'd just call it type
What do you guys think?
Has the ship not already sailed on this one? The php.net web site (
http://php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.typehinting.php), and userland
developers, have been calling them type hints for years now, I'd imagine
whatever new name comes up will largely be ignored outside
On Sep 16, 2014, at 8:11, Levi Morrison le...@php.net wrote:
Can anyone come up with a better name than `hints`? Maybe `type
declarations`? Or should we just stick with `hints`?
My general feeling is to leave it alone. I agree that it's a misnomer, but as
has been mentioned, it's a well
On 17/09/14 09:46, Sara Golemon wrote:
As for Hint versus Declaration/Decl or Annotation or whatever... My second
choice (since staying with hint is my first) is probably decl(aration).
Despite my HHVM loyalties, I'm not fond of using annotation here anyway.
There's a reasonable argument
Robert Stoll wrote (on 16/09/2014):
I would argue type declaration is wrong as well since it is not a type
declaration as it is known in other languages where the type declaration is
binding. IMO it is more a type check. Consider the following
function foo(Bar $b){
$b = 1; //$b is not a Bar
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Rowan Collins [mailto:rowan.coll...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. September 2014 18:01
An: internals@lists.php.net
Betreff: Re: AW: [PHP-DEV] Renaming type-hints to something else?
Robert Stoll wrote (on 16/09/2014):
I would argue type
Sara Golemon wrote (on 17/09/2014):
My general feeling is to leave it alone. I agree that it's a misnomer, but as
has been mentioned, it's a well established misnomer. I don't see a big gain
from it apart from academic purity.
I guess in that way it's similar to overloading, which has a
Dear list,
I've always been bothered by the fact that we call type declarations
'hints', as if they aren't enforced. They have always been enforced
and we don't have an option to turn them off.
I'm wondering if we want to move away from that name to something
else. I have two RFCs already that
Hi!
Here are my thoughts.
The general concept should be called Optional Type Declarations, to replace
“Type Hinting. They are type declarations, and they are optional. Thus the
name. For the things themselves, they’re just Type Declarations, to replace
“Type Hints. So, for example:
“I am a
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Hi!
Here are my thoughts.
The general concept should be called Optional Type Declarations, to replace
“Type Hinting. They are type declarations, and they are optional. Thus the
name. For the things themselves, they’re just
On 16 Sep 2014, at 16:24, Levi Morrison le...@php.net wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
The general concept should be called Optional Type Declarations, to replace
“Type Hinting. They are type declarations, and they are optional. Thus the
name. For
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andrea Faulds [mailto:a...@ajf.me]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. September 2014 17:26
An: Levi Morrison
Cc: internals
Betreff: Re: [PHP-DEV] Renaming type-hints to something else?
On 16 Sep 2014, at 16:24, Levi Morrison le...@php.net wrote:
On Tue
16 matches
Mail list logo
