RE: [iText-questions] Sign field ( itext-paulo-110)

2003-03-10 Thread Paulo Soares
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 13:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [iText-questions] Sign field ( itext-paulo-110) Concerning the unofficial release of itext (itext-paulo-110) : Would the enhanced fdf

RE: [iText-questions] Sign field ( itext-paulo-110)

2003-03-10 Thread Thomas . Byholm
Anoter question concerning this problem would be as follows: Consider that I have a collection of two or more readily made PDF documents with FDF fields filled with that and a SIGN field that is already signed. The question would be: Is it possible, using the latest unofficial version of

RE: [iText-questions] Sign field ( itext-paulo-110)

2003-03-10 Thread Paulo Soares
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 14:38 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [iText-questions] Sign field ( itext-paulo-110) Anoter question concerning this problem would be as follows: Consider that I have a collection

RE: [iText-questions] Sign field ( itext-paulo-110)

2003-03-10 Thread Leonard Rosenthol
At 4:38 PM +0200 3/10/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Consider that I have a collection of two or more readily made PDF documents with FDF fields filled with that and a SIGN field that is already signed. OK. The question would be: Is it possible, using the latest unofficial version of I-Text, to