Hello Ivan!
It's so sad to me that you had bad results with that patch. :)
The discussion in the ticket is out-of-date - the patch was initially in
several classes, used WeakHashMap but then it evolved to what it's now - one
StoredFieldSortFactory class. I use it in my sharehound app in pretty
.
Regards,
Artem
On 4/24/07, Artem Vasiliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Ivan!
It's so sad to me that you had bad results with that patch. :)
The discussion in the ticket is out-of-date - the patch was initially in
several classes, used WeakHashMap but then it evolved to what it's now - one
Hi Ivan!
btw may be forbidding the sorted search in case of too many results is an
option? I did this way in my case.
Regards,
Artem.
On 4/24/07, Artem Vasiliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahhh, you said in your original post that your search matches _all_ the
results.. Yup my patch
Hello Scott!
I think your index is just not large really. My Sharehound's indexes of my
corporate LAN is about 10G/10mlns of (really small) documents now, and queries
get really little time, less than a second for non-sorted queries and some more
for sorted. The machine is some P4 with 1G RAM. I
, I'm interested in it :)
OG I'm also interested in a patch or contribution for Lucene itself.
OG Please follow-up on java-user or java-dev.
OG Thanks,
OG Otis
OG - Original Message
OG From: Artem Vasiliev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OG To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi guys!
I have noticed many questions on the list vonsidering Lucene sorting
memory consumption and hope my solution can help someone.
I faced a memory/time consumption problem on sorting in Lucene back in
April. With a help of this list's experts I came to solution which I
like: documents from
Hello Hoss,
Thanks for your answer, you're right, filepathes are pretty much
unique. Anyway I don't want this total-field-cache-loading situation occur
in any circumstances - it's too expensive. My app usually crawls while
user searches are performed. Crawl involves additions and deletions so
I tried to
sort by filePath field which can be 100 bytes at average meaning 400M
RAM for the cache
YS For string sorting, a FieldCache.StringIndex is used.
YS It contains a sorted String[num_unique_terms_in_field], and an int[maxDoc]
YS So if 10 documents share a large string field value, that
Hello Yonik,
Thanks, it explains my issue and that's definitely a hit - I tried to
sort by filePath field which can be 100 bytes at average meaning 400M
RAM for the cache + IO excess to load them from 3G index. I wish this
caching were configurable as lazy or switched off, do you know if
that's
Hi guys!
I'd like to thank the developers and contributors of Lucene project
for the fantastic library. And thanks Otis and Erik for a great book!
I'm writing an open source file searcher application 'sharehound'
(http://sharehound.sourceforge.net/) based on Lucene. It can now
search SMB file
Hello Xia,
XD what's the difference from dotLucene?
Why dotLucene? dotLucene is the .Net port of Lucene, so your question
is pretty much the same as 'what's the difference from Lucene?'
dotLucene as Lucene itself is not a search application, it's a
library, so that's the difference :).
Some of
11 matches
Mail list logo