Dear Jmol,
Is there a way to save Jmol state with the pre-calculated surface?
We can save the Jmol state, and render the structure with the same
look, orientation, etc. However, if the state contains a surface
calculation, the surface is recalculated again on load.
On the other side, I can save
yes you are right
--
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
Pieremanuele Canepa
Room 104
Functional Material Group
School of Physical Sciences, Ingram Building,
University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent,
CT2 7NH
United Kingdom
e-mail: pc...@kent.ac.uk
mobile: +44 (0)
Hi,
does someone else experience painfully slow callbacks in firefox on mac osx?
http://weirdbyte.de/jmol-test/html/slow_callbacks.html
I did some measurements. The numbers do very, but there is always a huge
difference between callbacks registered and not.
Best
Alexander
The numbers:
*
Seconded. I thought this would be fixed back when the 200 ms issue was
fixed, but I'm still experiencing slow callbacks.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Alexander Rose alexander.r...@weirdbyte.de
wrote:
Hi,
does someone else experience painfully slow callbacks in firefox on mac
osx?
This seems to be another example of Mac Firefox (and I suspect Camino and
SeaMonkey) behaving differently. I would be interested in the results of the
following three experiments:
1. What happens if you use the signed rather than the unsigned applet?
2. What happens if you remove the
Hi,
Am 11.08.2010 um 17:51 schrieb Robert Hanson:
I think you mean that you want to be able to set the cutoff or sigma value
on the fly.
you're right
That's not going to happen. Jmol doesn't save the entire cube file or map
data -- and doesn't generally have the memory available
Hi,
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
Von: Robert Hanson hans...@stolaf.edu
An: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. August 2010 14:48:50
Betreff: Re: [Jmol-users] change the visible part of an isosurface without
reloading
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Alexander Rose
Hi,
i can't set the memory for the applet (jmolSetMemoryMb(512);) on Firefox/Mac
OSX, but it works on Safari/Mac and Firefox/Ubuntu. Any Ideas? I also set the
memory Java-Preferences app on mac, but no change.
Example: http://weirdbyte.de/jmol-test/html/jvxl_vs_ccp4_speed.html
Alex
Hi,
Is there a way to disable the 'mouse down zoom area' on the right side of the
applet?
Alex
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
Alex,
I'm not sure what you are doing on your web page, but it is causing some
strange behavior for me on Safari 5.0 on OS X 10.6.4. Several times it crashed
the browser. It seems to be opening the page and somehow automatically opening
what looks like Firebug, but it is behind the applets
Hi,
Am 16.08.2010 um 20:58 schrieb Jeff Hansen:
Alex,
I'm not sure what you are doing on your web page, but it is causing some
strange behavior for me on Safari 5.0 on OS X 10.6.4. Several times it
crashed the browser. It seems to be opening the page and somehow
automatically opening
Yes, upping the memory given to java seems to have helped. I think in the
process of editing the page you may have messed something else up since the
following is showing at the bottom of the page.
function klick(){
isosurface display within 5.0 ({atomIndex = _atomPicked});
center
Hi,
I looked into it some more and it seems that 'jmolSetMemoryMb(512);' is also
not working for Safari/Mac. I was previously mistaken, because I hadn't taken
the effect of the Java-Preferences app into account.
Signed and unsigned Applet
Safari 5.0.1/Mac:
Java-Preferences app -Xmx512 - works
hi,
that's allright, its some jmolscript, just to show you what is supposed to
happen when you click on an atom
alex
Am 16.08.2010 um 22:56 schrieb Jeff Hansen:
Yes, upping the memory given to java seems to have helped. I think in the
process of editing the page you may have messed
Hi,
Am 16.08.2010 um 17:48 schrieb Philip Bays:
This seems to be another example of Mac Firefox (and I suspect Camino and
SeaMonkey) behaving differently. I would be interested in the results of the
following three experiments:
1. What happens if you use the signed rather than the
Sweet! Wonder what's different about 4.0?
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Alexander Rose alexander.r...@weirdbyte.de
wrote:
Hi,
Am 16.08.2010 um 17:48 schrieb Philip Bays:
This seems to be another example of Mac Firefox (and I suspect Camino and
SeaMonkey) behaving differently. I would
OK. The issue is with the embedding plugins and OS 10.6, as my issue was.
There is no workaround that I know of. The author of the plugin is working on
a revision, but it is not clear when that will be available and if it will be
useful for current versions of firefox. The beta versions
From the early days of Jmol, I remember having to install the embeddingPlugins
into firefox because it did not play well with Jmol and apparently other
applets. I thought the issue was taken care of, but instead Mozilla moved to
embedding the embeddingPlugins in the firefox distribution. OS
18 matches
Mail list logo
