I think it gets back to the issue of what is embedded in what. The magic of
the Jmol applet, of course, is that you can embed it in whatever context
you want -- Jena3D, for example. This is not directly possible for the Jmol
application. (It can be done, but you have to be a Java programmer to do
Am 09.06.17 um 15:21 schrieb Robert Hanson:
Yes. By "felt" you mean that the browser will manage its threads
relating to tabs and other dyanamic content (e.g. ads), and it may shift
a running JavaScript app to a lower priority more likely than a running
Java application would or, in particular,
Am 09.06.17 um 15:21 schrieb Robert Hanson:
I think we're one level off here. You can always run Jmol.jar if you
want Jmol's desktop application, and nothing is going to change about
that. It isn't an applet, so there is no browser issue.
I don't think that Jmol's current desktop application
I don't know anything about JavaFX, but it's not clear to me there has
>> been any development on it since 2012 or 2014. Maybe just an idea that
>> never took off? Do you see some advantage to this?
>>
>> Since I don't have done any Java programming I will know even less. When
> I spoke to a
Am 08.06.17 um 19:44 schrieb Robert Hanson:
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Rolf Huehne > wrote:
Am 08.06.17 um 14:41 schrieb Robert Hanson:
RIP, Java applets.
Since there still are many situations where the
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Rolf Huehne
wrote:
> Am 08.06.17 um 14:41 schrieb Robert Hanson:
>
>> RIP, Java applets.
>>
>> Since there still are many situations where the superior Java performance
> would be helpful (large structures; surfaces; complex Jmol
Am 08.06.17 um 14:41 schrieb Robert Hanson:
RIP, Java applets.
Since there still are many situations where the superior Java
performance would be helpful (large structures; surfaces; complex Jmol
scripts that are running about 50 times slower in the Javascript
version) it would still be
Hi, Henry,
In addition to Internet Explorer 11* (still included in Windows 10 as
far as I know), several minor browsers that still supported Java when
last I checked in March 2017 are listed here:
http://proteopedia.org/w/Installing_and_enabling_Java#Browsers_That_Support_Java
* See
09/29/2005 08:18 AM 1,813,012 ch3cl-density.cub
09/17/2006 07:47 AM 600,830 ch3cl-density.cub.gz
06/08/2017 08:39 AM 4,631 ch3cl-density.jvxl
06/08/2017 08:40 AM 2,928 ch3cl-density.jvxl.gz
So that is 390:1 with just the JVXL, or 619:1 compression
> On 8 Jun 2017, at 13:45, Robert Hanson wrote:
>
> ps -- neither of the VMD images at
> http://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/?p=18365#comment-243964 are volume
> rendering, by the way. They are just surfaces, one with reflection; one just
> a mesh. Right?
Yes. The
ps -- neither of the VMD images at
http://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/?p=18365#comment-243964 are volume
rendering, by the way. They are just surfaces, one with reflection; one
just a mesh. Right?
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 7:41 AM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> RIP, Java
RIP, Java applets.
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Rzepa, Henry S
wrote:
> I have had a look at Safari preview 32. In the preferences/security tab,
> the current production safari has settings for
>
> 1. Allow WebGL
> 2. Allow Internet Plugins, and in this latter one
12 matches
Mail list logo