On Jan 6, 9:15 pm, Acaz Souza acazso...@gmail.com wrote:
Is just for learning this interesting point.
What the matematics logic of both in animation framework.
They use the same logic?
This is the original question:
| MooTools:http://www.jsfiddle.net/4vnya/
|
MooTools:http://www.jsfiddle.net/4vnya/
jQuery: http://www.jsfiddle.net/eFbwJ/36/
(Compare the code, the effects. You decide.)
Why mootools is more smooth than jquery?
On Jan 6, 3:44 pm, Acaz Souza acazso...@gmail.com wrote:
MooTools:http://www.jsfiddle.net/4vnya/
jQuery:http://www.jsfiddle.net/eFbwJ/36/
(Compare the code, the effects. You decide.)
Why mootools is more smooth than jquery?
It's not, at least not in my FF3.5.6 on Win XP.
Haven't you been
It is, at least in my FF 3.5.7 on Win 7, but I haven't the slightest clue as
to why. Thanks for sharing those demos.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Scott Sauyet scott.sau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 6, 3:44 pm, Acaz Souza acazso...@gmail.com wrote:
MooTools:http://www.jsfiddle.net/4vnya/
They seem about the same to me as well, FF3.5.6 on Win7
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Scott Sauyet
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 1:29 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Why mootools animations is more
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Scott Sauyet
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 1:29 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Why mootools animations is more smooth than jquery?
On Jan 6, 3:44 pm, Acaz Souza
Hi everyone, i´m from brazilian, my english is too bad. Sorry for bad
questions.
But, ok ok, This depends on the computer hardware, engine of the
browser, how the plugin is written and more...
But, another question, The algorithm of animation that has been made
in jquery to give the best quality
to be honest no library is 100% efficient.
its like a template that anyone can download. what counts as what you do
with it and if suits your needs.
in some cases you would create your very own template if nothing suits your
needs.
so if you require 100% smoothness in everything you would
Hi everyone, i will do some tests with this librarys, i will elevate
the CPU usage and tests in the major browsers.
On 5 dez, 09:57, waseem sabjee waseemsab...@gmail.com wrote:
to be honest no library is 100% efficient.
its like a template that anyone can download. what counts as what you do
test with the minified version :)
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Acaz Souza acazso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone, i will do some tests with this librarys, i will elevate
the CPU usage and tests in the major browsers.
On 5 dez, 09:57, waseem sabjee waseemsab...@gmail.com wrote:
to be
Karl Swedberg wrote:
On Dec 3, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Dave Methvin wrote:
I refrained from replying because the OP seemed trollish, but he has a
point, IMHO.
It would be great if someone who knew both frameworks could set up a
page that demonstrated a side-by-side case where Mootools has
Just used your benchmark and I didn't see any significant differences. Both
had slight jumps from time to time, none felt like there was a pattern, I'm
using Firefox 3.5 on a iMac pro (last year's edition) running snow leopard.
Michel Belleville
2009/12/4 Jonathan Vanherpe (T T NV)
That's why I said you needed to find a slow computer to test it on ;-).
We need to cater to a diverse audience, and part of that audience is
using IE6 on a crappy Intel Celeron chip or Firefox on a G4.
Jonathan
Michel Belleville wrote:
Just used your benchmark and I didn't see any significant
Celeron? BAH!
They need to kill that beast.
In openSuse, on a not so slow machine ;) running KDE, Firefox 3.5.5
with only the cookie monster plugin activated, I noticed a slight lag
in the mootools sample.
Some of this perceived speed difference may be a direct result of
plugins, or proxy
I have a 'slow computer' that is 6 years old hardware, has been
upgraded from windows 3.1 and upward, to the current XP without ever a
wipe and reinstall. I figure I'm a worst-case scenario if there ever
was one. ;-)
I routinely find pages loading extremely slow from javascript-intense
sites.
Just out of curiosity, which browser are you using? Did you try it in
more than one?
--Karl
On Dec 4, 2009, at 9:43 AM, donb wrote:
I have a 'slow computer' that is 6 years old hardware, has been
upgraded from windows 3.1 and upward, to the current XP without ever a
wipe and reinstall. I
How the plugin is written is a huge part. I have jealously noticed in
the past that mootools animations typically seem to be smoother,
especially on slower machines and cruddy browsers, but I stick with
jQuery because I really like the syntax community. However, I agree
that no one has really
ok, I've used some code I had lying around and put dummy content in
there:http://www.tnt.be/bugs/jquery/moovsjquery/
I actually don't really see a difference on my Ubuntu box (using FF
3.6b4), but there's a huge difference on a colleague's G4 (OS X 10.4,
Firefox 3.5.5), so try to find a
The jquery framework in past, it use the fx animation, it's true?
On Dec 2, 4:26 pm, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote:
How is someone *possibly* supposed to answer that open ended and vague
question?
On Dec 2, 1:13 pm, Acaz Souza acazso...@gmail.com wrote:
anyone can help me?
On Dec
I wonder, is this a feeble attempt at launching a troll, a poorly worded
vague question, or just good old plain nonsense ?
Michel Belleville
2009/12/3 Acaz Souza acazso...@gmail.com
The jquery framework in past, it use the fx animation, it's true?
On Dec 2, 4:26 pm, MorningZ
Acaz,
I think you should consider looking into this yourself. The animations
provided by jQuery, while basic, are quite smooth and perform well. If
you feel that the ones provided by MooTools perform better, then I would
urge you to take the time to investigate it and consider offering
On Dec 3, 11:02 am, Rey Bango r...@reybango.com wrote:
I think you should consider looking into this yourself. The animations
provided by jQuery, while basic, are quite smooth and perform well. If
you feel that the ones provided by MooTools perform better, then I would
urge you to take the
LOL. :D
Thanks Scott.
Rey...
Scott Sauyet wrote:
On Dec 3, 11:02 am, Rey Bango r...@reybango.com wrote:
I think you should consider looking into this yourself. The animations
provided by jQuery, while basic, are quite smooth and perform well. If
you feel that the ones provided by MooTools
I'm not trolling (at least today I'm not ;-)), but mootools' effects are
smoother in at least some cases. I've switched to mootools for some
websites just because of that, even though I really prefer working with
jQuery.
Try using scrollTo() diagonally in both frameworks to see one example
lol, trollish
On Dec 3, 11:49 am, Jonathan Vanherpe (T T NV) jonat...@tnt.be
wrote:
I'm not trolling (at least today I'm not ;-)), but mootools' effects are
smoother in at least some cases. I've switched to mootools for some
websites just because of that, even though I really prefer working
That's certainly possible. Again, for me the animations provided by
jQuery have been great. I'd give you the same feedback in that if there
are issues, I'd urge you to see if you can pinpoint them and provide a
patch. That would be a great help to the project.
Rey...
Jonathan Vanherpe (T T
I refrained from replying because the OP seemed trollish, but he has a
point, IMHO.
It would be great if someone who knew both frameworks could set up a
page that demonstrated a side-by-side case where Mootools has smoother
animations than jQuery. Otherwise it's hard do know what might be
On Dec 3, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Dave Methvin wrote:
I refrained from replying because the OP seemed trollish, but he
has a
point, IMHO.
It would be great if someone who knew both frameworks could set up a
page that demonstrated a side-by-side case where Mootools has smoother
animations than
anyone can help me?
On Dec 2, 11:31 am, Acaz Souza acazso...@gmail.com wrote:
Why mootools animations is more smooth than jquery animations?
How is someone *possibly* supposed to answer that open ended and vague
question?
On Dec 2, 1:13 pm, Acaz Souza acazso...@gmail.com wrote:
anyone can help me?
On Dec 2, 11:31 am, Acaz Souza acazso...@gmail.com wrote:
Why mootools animations is more smooth than jquery animations?
30 matches
Mail list logo
