Re: [kbuild-devel] call for eyes - kbuild 2.5 on alpha

2001-12-15 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 12:49:18PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 17:08:18 -0500, Ghozlane Toumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - the most used kernel format in the alpha world is the vmlinux.gz rather than vmlinuz. is vmlinuz an standard for kbuild2.5, or should i keep the old

Re: [kbuild-devel] call for eyes - kbuild 2.5 on alpha

2001-12-15 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 12:49:18PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: I want one standard name for vmlinux compressed with gzip - vmlinuz. Part of the problem with kbuild 2.4 is each arch did their own thing, I am trying to standardize. It helps documentation if nothing else. After thinking about

[kbuild-devel] call for eyes - kbuild 2.5 on alpha

2001-12-14 Thread Ghozlane Toumi
Hi all ... I'm almost done with the alpha port of kbuild-2.5 . The almost part is documenting the installable tagets if they make it in + an issue whith building using 2 trees (see below). The standard (vmlinu[xz]) booting methods build and boot, the other 2 build, but are not tested .

Re: [kbuild-devel] call for eyes - kbuild 2.5 on alpha

2001-12-14 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 05:08:18PM -0500, Ghozlane Toumi wrote: - the most used kernel format in the alpha world is the vmlinux.gz rather than vmlinuz. is vmlinuz an standard for kbuild2.5, or should i keep the old vmlinuz.gz ? Why can't the 'VMLINUZ' target produce a vmlinux.gz on alpha?