Re: [libreoffice-l10n] gettext and translations

Il 01/06/2017 21:45, Mihkel Tõnnov ha scritto: 2017-06-01 18:14 GMT+03:00 Sophie : Hi all, I invite all of you to have a read to that message from Caolan, it's a discussion, so please share your concerns, your solutions, your views :)

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] gettext and translations

Hi, one thing which I miss in the current system is the possibility to translate plurals correctly. gettext supports that - maybe that it would be necessary to change something in code, but I think its is worth that. Pls, think about this best Milos On 2017-06-05 13:44, Sophie wrote: > Hi all, >

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] gettext and translations

Hi all, Le 04/06/2017 à 22:38, Cor Nouws a écrit : > m.balaba...@gmail.com wrote on 04-06-17 21:23: >> Yes, Bulgarian is also one of those inflected languages that require >> different translations to the same English phrase depending on the context. >> If we lose msgctxt, we must have another

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] gettext and translations

m.balaba...@gmail.com wrote on 04-06-17 21:23: > Yes, Bulgarian is also one of those inflected languages that require > different translations to the same English phrase depending on the context. > If we lose msgctxt, we must have another way to separate different instances > of the same

RE: [libreoffice-l10n] gettext and translations

Hello, Yes, Bulgarian is also one of those inflected languages that require different translations to the same English phrase depending on the context. If we lose msgctxt, we must have another way to separate different instances of the same English phrase. Years ago at my workplace, we had

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] gettext and translations

Another big +1 for what Martin and Mikhel have said about matching existing translations and not losing the ability to translate to different targets depending on the context. And another bad thing if we lost qtz (KeyIDs) pseudo locale to differ one entry from another. -- wbr, sb, Russian Team

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] gettext and translations

I've used the .PO based workflow from the beginning of my OOO/LO L10N stint, and yes, you'd get those problems in such environment. You'd just have to keep the IDs for strings translations' variants/exceptions/etc. separately. That was how I was dealing with the problem, anyway -- last

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] gettext and translations

Big +1 for what Martin and Mikhel have said about matching existing translations and not losing the ability to translate to different targets depending on the context. If there is going to be wholesale re-organisation as to how the strings are presented for translation, two other

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] gettext and translations

2017-06-01 18:14 GMT+03:00 Sophie : > Hi all, > > I invite all of you to have a read to that message from Caolan, it's a > discussion, so please share your concerns, your solutions, your views :) > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2017-May/077818.html

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] gettext and translations

Hi, Sophie, regarding 16 and 18, I think these are important or even most important ones. The 18 is the crucial one and should be tried in a separate world, with an extra instance of Pootle to test what really happens. Without testing this with real world examples it should not be introduced.