On Feb 6, 2009, at 3:43 PM, Jeremy Slade wrote:
Mr. Meitar Moscovitz wrote:
On Feb 6, 2009, at 9:35 AM, Jeremy Slade wrote:
I've been using laconica for a couple weeks now, and it's been
working
well -- props to the team.
My instance is deployed in a corporate internet, so
On Feb 6, 2009, at 8:52 PM, Evan Prodromou wrote:
So, Ubuntu has a pretty famous Bug #1:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1
The title is Microsoft has a majority market share. I think it's a
great part of the Ubuntu culture, because it focuses people on what
they want to do with Ubuntu.
Hi all,
There's been some discussion on the Identi.ca Laconica group with
regards to bangtag syntax for groups infringing on the space of
tags[0]. A couple people have suggested changing the way groups work
so that rather than linking them inline, they are linked to in the
same manner as
Along the lines of, Because silos are for missiles, not microblogs
how about some rephrasing of that?
• My microblog is stuck in a silo
• ...
-M
(Terse email sent from my iPod.)
On Feb 6, 2009, at 11:43 PM, Mr. Meitar Moscovitz meit...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Feb 6, 2009, at 8:52 PM, Evan
On Feb 8, 2009, at 7:20 AM, Evan Prodromou wrote:
If we tried to make groups and tags the same thing, we would ruin
people's expectations of hash tags in order to make a bad version of
groups. I would prefer not to do either.
I should perhaps start by clarifying that I actually *like*
Professional: http://MeitarMoscovitz.com
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Mr. Meitar Moscovitz meit...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Feb 14, 2009, at 8:31 AM, Evan Prodromou wrote:
Gavin Schulz wrote:
As far as I know, it is also. There is really no way to guard
against the hack because its all about
On Mar 4, 2009, at 6:42 AM, Ciaran Gultnieks wrote:
One suggestion - it seems that creating and deleting repos
is a relatively cheap operation in gitorious, so how about
creating individual cloned repositories for each specific
feature or bug fix, and requesting the merge from the
relevant
Hi all,
First, thanks for providing me commit access to the dev repository
directly. However, while I don't have any issue committing locally,
whenever I try to push to the dev.git repository, I'm given a fatal
error:
$ git push
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
I've tried to
On Mar 17, 2009, at 1:21 AM, Tobias Diekershoff wrote:
git push g...@gitorious.org:laconica/bAvatar-clone.git
with a : instead of a / after the org.
Thanks, Tobias! This is exactly what I needed.
I took Eric's advice and updated my remote's URL configuration:
$ git config remote.dev.url
On Apr 10, 2009, at 8:52 AM, Eric wrote:
Hey all,
After upgrading to 0.7.3 I noticed my subscribe buttons on user
pages only are not handled by ajax, it brings me to a odd page
(screen shot attached)
Subscribe works correct from the subscription page, also in IE with
Javascript
On Jul 19, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Stephen Paul Weber singpol...@singpolyma.net
wrote:
We may want to fine-tune this further in the future by putting a time
limit or inbox limit on those other input channels. It's very
unlikely
that someone is replying by XMPP or SMS to a notice that was posted
On Jul 19, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Eric wrote:
But you reply to that old stuff you discover via the web or api, not
via xmpp or sms (since how would you find that stuff if it never came
through xmpp or sms) correct?
-Eric Helgeson
True; I use the web a lot in that situation since the discovery
On Aug 30, 2009, at 7:07 AM, Steve Remington wrote:
Has anyone ever looked into the retweet feature? Personally I think
the feature is stupid but others do seem to like it.
Steve
Steve,
Are you talking about the redent standard?
http://status.net/trac/ticket/939
I have an experimental
On Sep 1, 2009, at 5:24 AM, Toby Inkster wrote:
Also, is there something better than in-reply-to that we can do? A
redent is not logically a reply - it's a forward. It would be great
if replies and forwards could be distinguished in the database by
more than a Unicode character as a
On Sep 1, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Craig Andrews wrote:
What do we all think about the re-dent implementation in this merge
request? http://gitorious.org/laconica/mainline/merge_requests/1391
I've seen a lot of discussion... but I'm not aware of any consensus.
~Craig
So, from what I gathered in
On Sep 2, 2009, at 2:44 AM, Adrian Lang wrote:
I say we should not try to distinguish between resends and replies
(in the database or user interface).
What about in machine-readable output streams? I ask since I just
looked over a patch I actually like from Toby Inkster[0] wherein
On Sep 2, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Sarven Capadisli wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 21:42 +0100, Toby Inkster wrote:
* A convention could be established using hashtags to indicate
languages. I've done a little experimentation and think that #.en,
#.fr, #.pl, etc might be a good pattern to use. Of
On Sep 3, 2009, at 4:24 PM, (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
I like the ideas for twitter on this:
http://s.twimg.com/retweet-dev-mocks-7-aug-09.png
http://www.joedawsons.com/2009/08/retweeting-is-cheating-thread.html
I think some things in this mock up are nifty, but IMHO a major,
major
18 matches
Mail list logo
