Thank you for the information :)
Ido
On Jan 20, 2008 10:12 PM, Luca Olivetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
En/na ik ha escrit:
For someone that does not know arm cpus, what are oabi and eabi ?
oabi (I don't think that's the proper definition, anyway o stands for
old) is the previous arm binary
I have got this when using Lazarus :
TApplication.HandleException In Stream (line 2955 pos 63):
Unmatching element end tag (expected /seealso)
Stack trace:
$082CEDA8 TXMLREADER__RAISEEXC, line 277 of laz_xmlread.pas
$082D117C CREATENAMEELEMENT, line 1105 of laz_xmlread.pas
Damien Gerard schreef:
I have got this when using Lazarus :
TApplication.HandleException In Stream (line 2955 pos 63): Unmatching
element end tag (expected /seealso)
Stack trace:
On what identifier was the cursor?
Vincent
_
Damien Gerard schreef:
On Jan 21, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Damien Gerard schreef:
I have got this when using Lazarus :
TApplication.HandleException In Stream (line 2955 pos 63):
Unmatching element end tag (expected /seealso)
This is in forms.xml. I will fix this.
Vincent
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:27:27 +0100
Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Damien Gerard schreef:
I have got this when using Lazarus :
TApplication.HandleException In Stream (line 2955 pos 63):
Unmatching element end tag (expected
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:39:54 +0100
Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lord Satan schrieb:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:33:53 +0200 Graeme Geldenhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still think having a custom Object Pascal written toolkit for
Lazarus is the way to go. The LCL would have
Mattias Gaertner schreef:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:27:27 +0100
Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Damien Gerard schreef:
I have got this when using Lazarus :
TApplication.HandleException In Stream (line 2955 pos 63):
Unmatching
On 21/01/2008, Lord Satan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the point. fpGUI may be a nice idea but I got a little tired about
reading how great it is over and over again (because it is really, really
ugly, not the native gui for the different supported plattforms and native
gui support has
Zitat von Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mattias Gaertner schreef:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:27:27 +0100
Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Damien Gerard schreef:
I have got this when using Lazarus :
Mattias Gärtner schreef:
e a :)
So, someone is still editing the xml code directly instead of using lazde. What
is wrong with lazde?
At least:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=10274
Vincent
_
To unsubscribe: mail
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:45:16 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No offence taken. fpGUI is a young project and making it look native
is on the todo list. It simply hasn't been a priority yet (I have lots
of other things to do first). As for looking native... everybody
keeps
Marco van de Voort ha scritto:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 03:00:41AM -0200, Fl?vio Etrusco wrote:
On Jan 17, 2008 7:15 PM, Marco van de Voort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 08:40:11PM +0100, Giuliano Colla wrote:
I stumbled, by chance, into a rather fair comparison of Delphi
Florian Klaempfl ha scritto:
Lord Satan schrieb:
[...]
That's correct. And if they had used OpenGL for it, it would be
hardware accelerated, cross plattform and good looking, too. And we
would need no stupid Aero or Compiz or other composition managers.
And we could do things other widgetsets
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Giuliano Colla wrote:
Florian Klaempfl ha scritto:
Lord Satan schrieb:
[...]
That's correct. And if they had used OpenGL for it, it would be
hardware accelerated, cross plattform and good looking, too. And we
would need no stupid Aero or Compiz or other
On 21/01/2008, Giuliano Colla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the real catch. They're not stupid, but they're faced with an
impossible task: to implement conflicting specs.
vcl implies a number of precise, consistent specs, which dictate
component behavior. They're the real value of Delphi.
On 21/01/2008, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of putting a lot of time in such mostly useless debates (its not
the first, and probably not the last) it would have been better to report
Yeah, I can't even remember what the original post was about? :-)
Regards,
- Graeme
Michael Van Canneyt ha scritto:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Giuliano Colla wrote:
Florian Klaempfl ha scritto:
Lord Satan schrieb:
[...]
That's correct. And if they had used OpenGL for it, it would be
hardware accelerated, cross plattform and good looking, too. And we
would need no stupid Aero or
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 21/01/2008, Giuliano Colla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Without a mature IDE to work with, fpGUI isn't worth the trouble. It
becomes much easier to learn C++ and use Qt Designer, or whatever.
Umm... I don't know how I should take this! :-) fpGUI is by no means
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:08:30 +0100
Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008, at 5:00 PM, Al Boldi wrote:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Op maandag 21-01-2008 om 16:57 uur [tijdzone +0300], schreef Al
Boldi:
Exactly right! The best feature is find
Op maandag 21-01-2008 om 19:00 uur [tijdzone +0300], schreef Al Boldi:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Op maandag 21-01-2008 om 16:57 uur [tijdzone +0300], schreef Al Boldi:
Exactly right! The best feature is find declaration/implementation,
but this only works for pascal code. What is
On Monday 21 January 2008 01:18:56 pm Giuliano Colla wrote:
Either one takes the Qt way, i.e. using style to *mimic* the native
*look*, without actually using it, and provides a consistent behavior,
this does not honour the huge Qt effort. Qt DOES use
the native widget when necessary do have
Giuliano Colla wrote:
However, if you're so kind to tell me:
1) What is the irc channel (do I need a life jacket to join it? :-) )
2) How to join it
I'll gladly join the irc channel, because, from a user standpoint, I've
Server irc.freenode.net, join #lazarus-ide.
See you there ;-)
Micha
Micha Nelissen ha scritto:
Giuliano Colla wrote:
However, if you're so kind to tell me:
1) What is the irc channel (do I need a life jacket to join it? :-) )
2) How to join it
I'll gladly join the irc channel, because, from a user standpoint, I've
Server irc.freenode.net, join #lazarus-ide.
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Luca Olivetti schrieb:
En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit:
It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL
So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc?
Well, I did initial support. If you provide bugs reports, I'll try to
fix them.
hmm... current
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:57:39 +0300
Al Boldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 21/01/2008, Giuliano Colla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Without a mature IDE to work with, fpGUI isn't worth the trouble.
It becomes much easier to learn C++ and use Qt Designer, or
whatever.
Can anyone give me an idea of the cost of QT commercial licensing fees? Their
website provides only a contact form to get pricing. I was curious what a
license would be to deploy on windows and linux.
--
Warm Regards,
Lee
Everything I needed to learn in life, I learned selling
On 21/01/2008, Joost van der Sluis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Question to think about is why there isn't any open-source native IDE
like Lazarus for c/c++ at all?)
KDevelop? Eclipse (what I guess that's not native).
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
Graeme Geldenhuys пишет:
On 21/01/2008, Joost van der Sluis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Question to think about is why there isn't any open-source native IDE
like Lazarus for c/c++ at all?)
KDevelop? Eclipse (what I guess that's not native).
There is CodeBlocks too (see
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 07:00:46PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Op maandag 21-01-2008 om 16:57 uur [tijdzone +0300], schreef Al Boldi:
Exactly right! The best feature is find declaration/implementation,
but this only works for pascal code. What is needed to make
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008 9:44 PM, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone give me an idea of the cost of QT commercial licensing fees? Their
website provides only a contact form to get pricing. I was curious what a
license would be to deploy on windows and
On 21/01/2008, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone give me an idea of the cost of QT commercial licensing fees? Their
website provides only a contact form to get pricing. I was curious what a
license would be to deploy on windows and linux.
From memory (3 years ago) it was
On Jan 21, 2008, at 10:03 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 21/01/2008, Den Jean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 21 January 2008 01:18:56 pm Giuliano Colla wrote:
Either one takes the Qt way, i.e. using style to *mimic* the native
*look*, without actually using it, and provides a consistent
Marc Weustink wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Luca Olivetti schrieb:
En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit:
It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL
So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc?
Well, I did initial support. If you provide bugs reports, I'll try to
fix them.
Hi,
This always used to work fine, but lately any Toolbar component
doesn't paint it's canvas background. This appears under GTK1 and
GTK2. What changed to break it? Can we undo that change to get it
back to normal again? It's very annoying when you use the Editor
Toolbar add-on package with
[...I forgot the attachment size limit so I split the email in two...]
-- Forwarded message --
From: Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 22 Jan 2008 09:33
Subject: Lazarus compiled with GTK2
To: lazarus@miraclec.com
Hi,
Every couple of months I try Lazarus compiled with
[...I forgot the attachment size limit so split the email in two...]
-- Forwarded message --
From: Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 22 Jan 2008 09:33
Subject: Lazarus compiled with GTK2
To: lazarus@miraclec.com
Hi,
Every couple of months I try Lazarus compiled with
Graeme Geldenhuys пишет:
Hi,
This always used to work fine, but lately any Toolbar component
doesn't paint it's canvas background. This appears under GTK1 and
GTK2. What changed to break it? Can we undo that change to get it
back to normal again? It's very annoying when you use the Editor
37 matches
Mail list logo
