Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Personally I would rank debugger way higher on my wishlist than packages.
That won't work. DDD is a frontend to GDB. And guess where the problem
is? The problem is GDB.
Can you tell me more about the problems with GDB ?
Joost.
regards Wim
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 29/01/2008, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aha !
So, in the end, the problem solves itself, if they are all on linux ;-)
It's a slow process though! :-) +-250 franchisees with avg 25+
computers and +-230 schools with a avg 30+ computers.
Trolltech gets acquired by Nokia.
The key motivation of Nokia is CrossPlatform development.
That also a kyey interest of Lazarus.
So I think the Qt interface is becoming more important in the future.
Regards Wim
_
To
Damien Gerard wrote:
On Jan 28, 2008, at 10:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on Hamradio station logging program in Lazarus
(http://cqrlog.sourceforge.net/). I started a few months (maybe a year)
ago in Lazarus 0.9.23 CVS (I don't remember date, I'm on another
computer). Why
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on Hamradio station logging program in Lazarus
(http://cqrlog.sourceforge.net/). I started a few months (maybe a year)
ago in Lazarus 0.9.23 CVS (I don't remember date, I'm on another
computer). Why this CVS version? Because almost what I need works very
Bogusław Brandys wrote:
John Stoneham wrote:
On Jan 28, 2008 2:05 AM, willem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trolltech gets acquired by Nokia.
The key motivation of Nokia is CrossPlatform development.
That also a kyey interest of Lazarus.
So I think the Qt interface is becoming more important
John Stoneham wrote:
On Jan 28, 2008 2:05 AM, willem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trolltech gets acquired by Nokia.
The key motivation of Nokia is CrossPlatform development.
That also a kyey interest of Lazarus.
So I think the Qt interface is becoming more important in the future.
Regards Wim
Albert Zeyer wrote:
Am Montag, den 28.01.2008, 10:31 +0100 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'm working on Hamradio station logging program in Lazarus
(http://cqrlog.sourceforge.net/). I started a few months (maybe a year)
ago in Lazarus 0.9.23 CVS (I don't remember date, I'm on another
John Stoneham wrote:
On Jan 28, 2008 5:25 AM, Ales Katona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Qt4 cannot be closed. Development can be stopped from the
Trolltech/Nokia side, but the GPL v4 which was released will remain.
Moreover, the foundation has rights to continue Qt development should
Trolltech be
Funky Beast wrote:
willem wrote:
Yes I agree but I find KDE 4 a very interesting development.
Interesting indeed ... KDE 4 somehow has the same goal as FPC/Lazarus,
yes I agree
Lazarus cooperating with KDE4 will lead to a very strong multiplatform
development.
IBM took Open
Warren Postma wrote:
My reason for complaining about Lazarus, and calling it unusable, is
that it suffers from worse usability defects (for what I want to use
it for)
than even the worst-ever versions of Delphi such as Delphi 2005.
If Lazarus could be as useful to me as Delphi 7, I would
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Warren Postma wrote:
My reason for complaining about Lazarus, and calling it unusable, is that it
suffers from worse usability defects (for what I want to use it for)
than even the worst-ever versions of Delphi such as Delphi 2005.
If Lazarus
Sergio Samayoa wrote:
Interesting.
What puzzles me is the very low traffic on forums and this list: Very few
active posters.
Regards.
Well I am more busy with coding than posting on this forum =-O
regards wim
-Mensaje original-
De: Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho [mailto:[EMAIL
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:48:56PM -0500, Warren Postma wrote:
My reason for complaining about Lazarus, and calling it unusable, is that
it suffers from worse usability defects (for what I want to use it for)
than even the worst-ever versions of Delphi such as
Vincent Snijders wrote:
willem schreef:
I try to generate xml with fpdoc, but I get an error message
xml isn input for fpdoc. To generate fpdoc xml use makeskel.
Vincent
Ok, I have done that.
output is now :
MakeSkel - FPDoc skeleton XML description file generator
Version 2.2.0 [2007/08
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, willem wrote:
I try to generate xml with fpdoc, but I get an error message
FPDoc - Free Pascal Documentation Tool
Version 2.2.0 [2007/08/30]
(c) 2000 - 2003 Areca Systems GmbH / Sebastian Guenther, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Invalid format XML-STRUCT
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, willem wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, willem wrote:
I try to generate xml with fpdoc, but I get an error message
FPDoc - Free Pascal Documentation Tool
Version 2.2.0 [2007/08/30]
(c) 2000 - 2003 Areca
Well I want to implement UML in the Lazarus Project.
Therefore I need XML documentation.
But in the Fpdoc source of dw_xml.pp the TXMLWriter.WriteDoc is is a Stub.
Its only a stub.
with a begin
then nothing !!
then end;
And Also the Fpdoc documentation says nothing about that.
Reagards Wim
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, willem wrote:
Well I want to implement UML in the Lazarus Project.
Therefore I need XML documentation.
? I don't see the connection between these two.
But in the Fpdoc source of dw_xml.pp the TXMLWriter.WriteDoc is is a Stub.
Its
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, willem wrote:
I call fpdoc with fpdoc --package=regexdna --input=regexdna.pas
This is the example of the fpdoc documentation.
And should be created a directory regdna which contains the Documentation.
But that does not occur .
What
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, willem wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, willem wrote:
I call fpdoc with fpdoc --package=regexdna --input=regexdna.pas
This is the example of the fpdoc documentation.
And should be created a directory
Adrian Maier wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008 7:36 AM, willem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to participate in the google android contest.
I want to argue to google that the lazarus object pascal platform is a
better choice than Java.
Hello,
It's unclear what are you trying to accomplish
Adrian Maier wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008 7:36 AM, willem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to participate in the google android contest.
I want to argue to google that the lazarus object pascal platform is a
better choice than Java.
Hello,
It's unclear what are you trying to accomplish
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, willem wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, willem wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, willem wrote:
I call fpdoc with fpdoc --package=regexdna
Adrian Maier wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008 1:03 PM, Adrian Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to mention that the android emulator is most likely a desktop
implementation of the
android java API : so probably it's impossible to actually run any
non-java applications
at this time .
Sorry
Damien Gerard wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008, at 2:40 PM, willem wrote:
Adrian Maier wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008 1:03 PM, Adrian Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to mention that the android emulator is most likely a desktop
implementation of the
android java API : so probably it's impossible
Liyuan Garcia Caballero wrote:
Damien Gerard escribió:
On Jan 10, 2008, at 2:40 PM, willem wrote:
Adrian Maier wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008 1:03 PM, Adrian Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to mention that the android emulator is most likely a desktop
implementation of the
android java API
Marius wrote:
willem wrote:
I want to argue to google that the lazarus object pascal platform is
a better choice than Java.
That would be real nice advertisement for FPC and pascal development
in general. (I doubt however you can change there platform)
I myself have been thinking about
I try to generate xml with fpdoc, but I get an error message
FPDoc - Free Pascal Documentation Tool
Version 2.2.0 [2007/08/30]
(c) 2000 - 2003 Areca Systems GmbH / Sebastian Guenther, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Invalid format XML-STRUCT specified
Writing 9 pages...
Done.
The pages are html in stead of
Well I am a newbie of Lazarus.
So i did use the Lazarus Wiki many times.
But I did notice that Porn sites did also discoved the Wiki of Lazarus.
But the Lazarus Core Developers are not distured by this Fact !!!
Regards Wim
_
Lee Jenkins wrote:
willem wrote:
Well I am a newbie of Lazarus.
So i did use the Lazarus Wiki many times.
But I did notice that Porn sites did also discoved the Wiki of Lazarus.
But the Lazarus Core Developers are not distured by this Fact !!!
Regards Wim
This one sure got some people
I want to participate in the google android contest.
I want to argue to google that the lazarus object pascal platform is a
better choice than Java.
I use the gentoo benchmark as a means make a case of it see
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/
In this benchmark game :-) you can find
I call fpdoc with fpdoc --package=regexdna --input=regexdna.pas
This is the example of the fpdoc documentation.
And should be created a directory regdna which contains the Documentation.
But that does not occur .
regards Wim
_
-Original Message-
From: Giuliano Colla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 January 2008 00:00
To: lazarus@miraclec.com
Subject: Re: [lazarus] Making GTK Thread Safe
willem ha scritto:
Giuliano Colla wrote:
willem ha scritto:
Please send your modified threadbug program , so that i can
I have a wiki site about google android.
It covers also the topic of lazarus and free pascal.
My visitors are interested in benchmark as my ranking.
A partical interesting benchmark is the free pas rex-dna benchmark.
Does one of the developers have more information of this benchmark ?
Regards
Al Boldi wrote:
willem wrote:
well I made 10 copy's of threadbug and run them in parallel. In my case
libpthread does not allocate a 10 Mb memory block, because
the 10 processes should allocate 100Mb of memory Top does show only a
sligth increase in memory . On my kubuntu there are
145
Giuliano Colla wrote:
willem ha scritto:
I cannot observe memery leaks on my my kubuntu system.
Which kernel version and libc are you running?
Giuliano
I am using kernel 2.6.22
and libc6 2.6.1-ubuntu10
regards Wim
Giuliano Colla wrote:
willem ha scritto:
well I made 10 copy's of threadbug and run them in parallel. In my
case libpthread does not allocate a 10 Mb memory block, because
the 10 processes should allocate 100Mb of memory Top does show only
a sligth increase in memory . On my kubuntu
Giuliano Colla wrote:
willem ha scritto:
Please send your modified threadbug program , so that i can compare
the results on my system.
Please find it here attached.
Giuliano
Well I have the same result.
the virtual memory has increased.
But I am using kernel 2.6.22 but the latest kernel
Giuliano Colla wrote:
Al Boldi ha scritto:
For now, when you start a thread non-suspended,
TThread.Execute(false), can you see the memory increase for your
project1 app when checking with top? Then, when you
TThread.WaitFor/TThread.Free, does it decrease? And by how much?
Below is the
willem wrote:
Giuliano Colla wrote:
Al Boldi ha scritto:
For now, when you start a thread non-suspended,
TThread.Execute(false), can you see the memory increase for your
project1 app when checking with top? Then, when you
TThread.WaitFor/TThread.Free, does it decrease? And by how much
Giuliano Colla wrote:
willem ha scritto:
willem wrote:
Giuliano Colla wrote:
Al Boldi ha scritto:
For now, when you start a thread non-suspended,
TThread.Execute(false), can you see the memory increase for your
project1 app when checking with top? Then, when you
TThread.WaitFor
Paulo Costa wrote:
At 18:46 02/01/2008, willem wrote:
Vincent has made an improved Mandelbrot benchmark.
i did run the original mandelbrot benchmark with N =5000. It took 2:
20 minutes.
The improved version took 2:00 minutes.
If you see the gcc version you'll see that it relies on SSE2
Vincent Snijders wrote:
willem schreef:
In mandelbrot.pas the Calulatatepoint is used. If you remove this
function then you can also gain speed.
I think I am missing something. How can you remove the calculatepoint?
Of course it would speed up, because 90% of the caclulations occur
Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
willem wrote:
1 IF we take the mandelbrot paramet N = 5000 then Calculatepoint will
be called 2500 times.
andCalculatePoint pushes x*Step - 1.5,Cy on the stack.
then it executes the statements of CalculatePoint
and finally it pops a boolean from the stack.
It does
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Sergei Gorelkin schreef:
willem wrote:
1 IF we take the mandelbrot paramet N = 5000 then Calculatepoint
will be called 2500 times.
andCalculatePoint pushes x*Step - 1.5,Cy on the stack.
then it executes the statements of CalculatePoint
and finally it pops
Peter Vreman wrote:
At 17:01 1-1-2008, you wrote:
Vincent Snijders wrote:
willem schreef:
Benchmark results from :
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=sumcollang=all#about
Conclusion : It would be good to have a compiler switch that
optimizes for speed
Lee Jenkins wrote:
willem wrote:
Benchmark results from :
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=sumcollang=all#about
To me, it looks like FreePascal is ranking up there almost every
Vincent Snijders wrote:
willem schreef:
Peter Vreman wrote:
At 17:01 1-1-2008, you wrote:
Vincent Snijders wrote:
willem schreef:
Benchmark results from :
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=sumcollang=all#about
Conclusion : It would be good to have a compiler switch
Vincent has made an improved Mandelbrot benchmark.
i did run the original mandelbrot benchmark with N =5000. It took 2: 20
minutes.
The improved version took 2:00 minutes.
I also tried to run the g++ mandelbrot benchmark but I got 14 errors
because this program is very complex.
regards
Vincent Snijders wrote:
willem schreef:
Benchmark results from :
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=sumcollang=all#about
Conclusion : It would be good to have a compiler switch that
optimizes for speed.
That is a wrong conclusion. All these programs were compiled
Well I get an debugger error.
Lazarus # 0.9.24 beta i386-linux-gtk
steps to reproduce:
1 create new project.
2 choose console application.
3 create
4 save change to project
5 applicationname test
6 source editor add line : writeln('test');
7 run - buildall
8 file - save all
9 save project1 -
Benchmark results from :
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=sumcollang=all#about
the thread-ring (new) benchmark rules
Each program should create and keep alive 503 threads, explicity or
Vincent Snijders wrote:
willem schreef:
Hello,
I just added Language benchmarks to my site.
If you take in account restricted memory and
speed then Free Pascal is the number ONE on
his list.
How did you make these measurements?
So the Lazarus and Free Pascal developers have
done
Alvise Nicoletti wrote:
willem ha scritto:
Hello,
I just added Language benchmarks to my site.
If you take in account restricted memory and
speed then Free Pascal is the number ONE on
his list.
So the Lazarus and Free Pascal developers have
done an excellent Job !
regards
Vincent Snijders wrote:
willem schreef:
Vincent Snijders wrote:
willem schreef:
Hello,
I just added Language benchmarks to my site.
If you take in account restricted memory and
speed then Free Pascal is the number ONE on
his list.
How did you make these measurements?
So the Lazarus
Vincent Snijders wrote:
willem schreef:
Vincent Snijders wrote:
willem schreef:
Hello,
I just added Language benchmarks to my site.
If you take in account restricted memory and
speed then Free Pascal is the number ONE on
his list.
How did you make these measurements?
So the Lazarus
Hello All,
The google android emulator now run under the
Lazarus IDE. See the the image in www.android-google.tk
Regards Wim
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
archives at
Bee wrote:
The google android emulator now run under the
Lazarus IDE. See the the image in www.android-google.tk
If I'm not mistaken, I saw you just call Android emulator through
Laz's custom tool. We could call anything using custom tool. What's
the point? Can we make application for
Hello,
I just added Language benchmarks to my site.
If you take in account restricted memory and
speed then Free Pascal is the number ONE on
his list.
So the Lazarus and Free Pascal developers have
done an excellent Job !
regards.
Under Kubuntu I downloaded the newest lazarus and fpc.
But i cannot use software breakpoints.
It is disabled. Is this a configuration issue or
are software not implemented yet ?
regards
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marc Weustink wrote:
willem wrote:
Under Kubuntu I downloaded the newest lazarus and fpc.
But i cannot use software breakpoints.
It is disabled. Is this a configuration issue or
are software not implemented yet ?
Did you configure a debugger in envirenmentoptions - debugger ?
Marc
Marc Weustink wrote:
willem wrote:
Marc Weustink wrote:
willem wrote:
Under Kubuntu I downloaded the newest lazarus and fpc.
But i cannot use software breakpoints.
It is disabled. Is this a configuration issue or
are software not implemented yet ?
Did you configure a debugger
Marc Weustink wrote:
willem wrote:
Marc Weustink wrote:
willem wrote:
Under Kubuntu I downloaded the newest lazarus and fpc.
But i cannot use software breakpoints.
It is disabled. Is this a configuration issue or
are software not implemented yet ?
Did you configure a debugger
Roberto Padovani wrote:
2007/11/26, Daniel Rincón García [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi, I need to capture the FieldValues of a SQLite database into a string
variable.
If I do it:
while not dsTest.EOF do
begin
DataToSend := DataToSend +
dsTest.FieldValues
Marc Santhoff wrote:
Hi Willem,
Am Freitag, den 23.11.2007, 10:19 +0100 schrieb willem:
Pieter Valentijn wrote:
Hi Willem Nice to see your from holland to.
Im sure where all intrested in what ever you can produce.
You seem to have a impressive ambition that is supporten by your
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 12:45:12 +0200
Razvan Adrian Bogdan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed the CodeGear roadmap and thought it would be nice to
see what they are planning to do so we keep somewhat close to Delphi's
improvements, they don't plan 64 bit support
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:56:21AM +0100, willem wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 07:52:59PM +0100, willem wrote:
I know that the lazarus grammar is based on yacc
I did some google search on the fpc
I do know
haha none of course vincent.
kind regards
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Pieter Valentijn wrote:
Hi Willem Nice to see your from holland to.
Im sure where all intrested in what ever you can produce.
You seem to have a impressive ambition that is supporten by your
experience.
Sorry in my previous post i made a mistake!
i used the java grammar file in stead
Pieter Valentijn wrote:
Hi Willem Nice to see your from holland to.
Im sure where all intrested in what ever you can produce.
You seem to have a impressive ambition that is supporten by your
experience.
Hello Pieter,
Yes i am from holland.
i am experienced but ia newby in the lazarus field
Well object pascal lies between java and c++.
android uses the eclipse ide.
but antlr has also an eclipse plugin.
object pascal and java grammars are available for antlr.
so we can bridge the gap between java and object pascal.
regards
Razvan Adrian Bogdan wrote:
Google is creating a
Víctor R. Ruiz wrote:
Hi:
2007/11/22, Luca Olivetti [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Considering that application for android have to be written in java I
somewhat doubt it.
Well I do hava android running on my pc as well as lazarus.
with a objesct pascal to java translator it must be
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 04:52:34PM +0700, Paul Ishenin wrote:
2007/11/22, Luca Olivetti [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Considering that application for android have to be written in java I
somewhat doubt it.
Even worse, Google uses its own virtual machine.
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:41:44AM +0100, willem wrote:
Well object pascal lies between java and c++.
It lies at C++ level.
android uses the eclipse ide.
but antlr has also an eclipse plugin.
object pascal and java grammars are available for antlr
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 02:42:58PM +0100, willem wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:41:44AM +0100, willem wrote:
Well object pascal lies between java and c++.
It lies at C++ level.
android uses
Sérgio Marcelo - Sumicity Networks wrote:
I would at first doubt one c++ programmer would say that. But who did?
:-)
well the c++ programmer who did say that is Bjarne Stoustrup,
the designer and implementor of the c++ language
Sérgio Marcelo
willem escreveu:
and the developper of c++ said
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 07:52:59PM +0100, willem wrote:
I know that the lazarus grammar is based on yacc
I did some google search on the fpc
I do know that google searches results are not always correct.
I a a newby to the lazarus project.
but i did study
In my opinion lazarus should be delphi compatible.
I know of other users who will switch to lazarus
if 100 % compatibility is achieved.
regards
Giuliano Colla schreef:
Mattias Gaertner ha scritto:
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 15:15:41 +0100
Tobias Giesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
if we add
Hello,
i do fully agree with you.
Implementing Semaphores is very important.
So i hope someone will implement this.
regards
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schreef:
On 10/30/07, 12 12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why TSemaphore not implemented for Win32?
AFAIK TSemaphore is just an alias
80 matches
Mail list logo
