Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
Just thought I would let everybody know, the SF.net SubVersion servers
seem to be back up again. It was some or other hardware failure.
Graeme.
On 25/01/2008, Osvaldo TC Filho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, 25/01/2008 11:18 ( -3:00 )
[EMAIL
Florian Klaempfl schrieb:
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
Just thought I would let everybody know, the SF.net SubVersion servers
seem to be back up again. It was some or other hardware failure.
Graeme.
On 25/01/2008, Osvaldo TC Filho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, 25/01/2008 11:18 ( -3:00 )
On 26/01/2008, Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://svn2.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus-ccr/
and
http://svn2.freepascal.org/svn/fpgui/
mirrors these repositories now.
Read only, i.e. one way mirror.
Many thanks Florian!
Regards,
- Graeme -
On 25/01/2008, Osvaldo TC Filho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, 25/01/2008 11:18 ( -3:00 )
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/deskx/pascal-src/subversion/lazarus-ccr$ svn up
svn: Requisição PROPFIND falhou em '/svnroot/lazarus-ccr'
svn: PROPFIND de '/svnroot/lazarus-ccr': não foi possível conectar-se ao
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
The SourceForce.net SubVersion servers have been down for the past 24
hours. A lot of people are complaining (including me!).
The problem has been reported, but still no action that we know of
from SourceForge.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=1atid=21
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
On 25/01/2008, Osvaldo TC Filho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, 25/01/2008 11:18 ( -3:00 )
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/deskx/pascal-src/subversion/lazarus-ccr$ svn up
svn: Requisição PROPFIND falhou em '/svnroot/lazarus-ccr'
svn: PROPFIND de '/svnroot/lazarus-ccr': não foi
Now, 25/01/2008 11:18 ( -3:00 )
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/deskx/pascal-src/subversion/lazarus-ccr$ svn cleanup
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/deskx/pascal-src/subversion/lazarus-ccr$ svn up
svn: Requisição PROPFIND falhou em '/svnroot/lazarus-ccr'
svn: PROPFIND de '/svnroot/lazarus-ccr': não foi possível
Just thought I would let everybody know, the SF.net SubVersion servers
seem to be back up again. It was some or other hardware failure.
Graeme.
On 25/01/2008, Osvaldo TC Filho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, 25/01/2008 11:18 ( -3:00 )
[EMAIL
Hi,
Anybody got issues with the Lazarus repository?
This is the error I get:
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:lazarus$ svn info
Path: .
URL: http://www.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/trunk
Repository Root: http://www.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus
Repository
On Jan 16, 2008, at 2:55 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
Anybody got issues with the Lazarus repository?
This is the error I get:
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:lazarus$ svn info
Path: .
URL: http://www.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/trunk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Anybody got issues with the Lazarus repository?
This is the error I get:
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:lazarus$ svn info
Path: .
URL: http://www.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/trunk
Repository Root: http
On Jan 16, 2008, at 3:04 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
No worries, I found the problem.
I had to relocate my working copy to a new svn address. No idea why it
was pointing to [http://www.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/trunk] instead
of [http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/trunk]
I don't
Graeme Geldenhuys ha scritto:
Hi,
Anybody got issues with the Lazarus repository?
This is the error I get:
[...]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:lazarus$ svn up
svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/svn/lazarus/trunk'
svn: PROPFIND of '/svn/lazarus/trunk': 405 Method Not Allowed
(http://www.freepascal.org
On 16/01/2008, Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm connecting from South Africa, if that's of any help.
So far ?!
It doesn't feel that far really. :-)
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
On Jan 16, 2008, at 3:08 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 16/01/2008, Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm connecting from South Africa, if that's of any help.
So far ?!
It doesn't feel that far really. :-)
From France a little :) Send a postcard ! :p
--
Damien Gerard
It seems the RSS for the subversion repository does not work anymore
since the 07/12/26.
(http://www.freepascal.org/feeds/lazarussvn.rss)
I have got a 404 not found.
It is really usefull :)
May be has it been moved somewhere else ?
--
Damien Gerard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
People who used
Damien Gerard schreef:
It seems the RSS for the subversion repository does not work anymore
since the 07/12/26.
(http://www.freepascal.org/feeds/lazarussvn.rss)
I have got a 404 not found.
It is really usefull :)
May be has it been moved somewhere else ?
The official url is:
http
On Jan 6, 2008, at 3:36 PM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
http://svn.freepascal.org/feeds/lazarussvn.rss
Thanks !
--
Damien Gerard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
People who used magic without knowing what they were doing usually
came to a sticky end. All over the entire room, sometimes.
-- (Terry
Damien Gerard wrote:
It seems the RSS for the subversion repository does not work anymore
since the 07/12/26.
(http://www.freepascal.org/feeds/lazarussvn.rss)
I have got a 404 not found.
It is really usefull :)
May be has it been moved somewhere else ?
Try this link
http://cia.vc/stats
On Jan 7, 2008, at 2:06 AM, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Damien Gerard wrote:
It seems the RSS for the subversion repository does not work
anymore since the 07/12/26.
(http://www.freepascal.org/feeds/lazarussvn.rss)
I have got a 404 not found.
It is really usefull :)
May be has
Hi all,
I'm trying to update my working copy but svn repository is down. I got:
C:\lazarussvn up
svn: richiesta PROPFIND fallita su '/svn/lazarus/trunk'
svn: PROPFIND di '/svn/lazarus/trunk': non ho potuto connettermi al server
(http
://svn.freepascal.org)
Has its address changed ?
Thanks
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Antonio Sanguigni wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to update my working copy but svn repository is down. I got:
C:\lazarussvn up
svn: richiesta PROPFIND fallita su '/svn/lazarus/trunk'
svn: PROPFIND di '/svn/lazarus/trunk': non ho potuto connettermi al server
(http
Nice to know this, will there be a repository for snapshots too ? :)
Razvan
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Razvan Adrian Bogdan schreef:
Nice to know this, will there be a repository for snapshots too ? :)
No, because it is too laborous to test them. Having possible unstable
(or very buggy) debs in the repository is not considered to be wise.
Debs will be available for download though
ik schreef:
I'm guessing, but it might be because I'm using amd64 and there is
only a directory for i386, that it can't find and just ignore the
repository or something ...
I added the amd64 debs for Lazarus 0.9.22 too.
I also put them on sourceforge:
http://sourceforge.net/project
ignore the
repository or something ...
I added the amd64 debs for Lazarus 0.9.22 too.
I also put them on sourceforge:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=89339package_id=243342
Vincent
_
To unsubscribe
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 11:16:41AM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
yes (latest (k)ubuntu feisty:
Sorry no, I was having a old /usr/local installation... :-(
--
Marco Ciampa
++
| Linux User #78271 |
| FSFE fellow #364 |
++
Marco Ciampa schreef:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 08:42:44PM +0200, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Marco Ciampa schreef:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 07:42:46PM +0200, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hi,
Since today Ubuntu users can install the latest Lazarus release from a
Unbuntu repository. 0.9.22 is only
://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/How_to_setup_a_FPC_and_Lazarus_Ubuntu_repository#The_debs
To put them into the lazarus-stable repository, they should be the
latest releases, i.e. fpc 2.0.4 and lazarus 0.9.22. I don't know if
Ubuntu already has fpc 2.0.4 debs, if so you can try to use the
instructions
On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 22:04:55 +0300
ik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm guessing, but it might be because I'm using amd64 and there is
only a directory for i386, that it can't find and just ignore the
repository or something ...
I extended the wiki page about an amd64 repository.
Mattias
Hi,
Since today Ubuntu users can install the latest Lazarus release from a
Unbuntu repository. 0.9.22 is only for i386, the upcoming 0.9.24 will be
available for x86_64 too.
For instructions see:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Getting_Lazarus#Getting_Lazarus_from_our_Ubuntu_repository
Hallo!
I'm ubuntu user who is maintaning 14 PCs with Lazarus in local academy (14
PC with ubuntu). And every time i install lazarus i have to recompile it
with GTK2 interface. It's time consuming activity.
Is it possable add to repository Lazarus-gtk2 version?
P.s.
I'm russian language user
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 07:42:46PM +0200, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hi,
Since today Ubuntu users can install the latest Lazarus release from a
Unbuntu repository. 0.9.22 is only for i386, the upcoming 0.9.24 will be
available for x86_64 too.
For instructions see:
http
Marco Ciampa schreef:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 07:42:46PM +0200, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hi,
Since today Ubuntu users can install the latest Lazarus release from a
Unbuntu repository. 0.9.22 is only for i386, the upcoming 0.9.24 will be
available for x86_64 too.
For instructions see:
http
Hi Vincent,
When I'm trying to get the repository, apt is unable to have it:
Get:5 http://www.hu.freepascal.org lazarus-stable Release.gpg [191B]
Ign http://www.hu.freepascal.org lazarus-stable/universe Translation-he
Are there any rules for locales on your http server ?
Anyway my locales
Jury Azovtzev schreef:
Hallo!
I'm ubuntu user who is maintaning 14 PCs with Lazarus in local academy
(14 PC with ubuntu). And every time i install lazarus i have to
recompile it with GTK2 interface. It's time consuming activity.
Is it possable add to repository Lazarus-gtk2 version?
P.s
ik schreef:
Hi Vincent,
When I'm trying to get the repository, apt is unable to have it:
Get:5 http://www.hu.freepascal.org lazarus-stable Release.gpg [191B]
I have this file:
http://www.hu.freepascal.org/lazarus/dists/lazarus-stable/Release.gpg
Ign http://www.hu.freepascal.org lazarus
I'm guessing, but it might be because I'm using amd64 and there is
only a directory for i386, that it can't find and just ignore the
repository or something ...
Ido
On 8/18/07, Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ik schreef:
Hi Vincent,
When I'm trying to get the repository, apt
i install lazarus i have to
recompile it with GTK2 interface. It's time consuming activity.
Is it possable add to repository Lazarus-gtk2 version?
P.s.
I'm russian language user and there is only one way to make lazarus show
messages and write in editor with russian letters - recompile
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 08:42:44PM +0200, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Marco Ciampa schreef:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 07:42:46PM +0200, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hi,
Since today Ubuntu users can install the latest Lazarus release from a
Unbuntu repository. 0.9.22 is only for i386, the upcoming
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:23:38 +0100 (CET), Marco van de Voort wrote:
[snip]
For Mac/PPC I did a test with the Indy after the 2.1.1 fix, but it
didn't work. I suspect some endianness trouble though. Maybe next
weekend I'll invest some time in testing this.
64-bit support is untested by me, but
IMO it is a good idea to provide a simple way/batch file to
build lazarus. But IMHO it is a bad idea to put several
batches/scripts for each platform into the main directory.
It would be better to add a INSTALL.txt, describing the most
common build commands for every platform and pointing to
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:20:45 +0100
Ale? Katona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which library would people suggest for this? Should I go for it,
would it be ok to use Indy or is there someother better / more
stable / supported lib for Lazarus?
First, you should know that as the author of
Thanks,
I'll make a .bat to set the FPC_PATH and FPC_BIN_PATH env vars and several
.bat for each of that stuff that call the first .bat that sets the FPC
path - so that you edit the paths only in one place (although I'd like it
better if FPC installer was setting these env vars globally - a
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:12:29 +0200
George Birbilis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks,
I'll make a .bat to set the FPC_PATH and FPC_BIN_PATH env vars and
several .bat for each of that stuff that call the first .bat that
sets the FPC path - so that you edit the paths only in one place
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:07:52 +0200
George Birbilis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO it is a good idea to provide a simple way/batch file to
build lazarus. But IMHO it is a bad idea to put several
batches/scripts for each platform into the main directory.
It would be better to add a
Nonsense. The .svn folders contain a whole copy of the files.
??? Strange, I'd expect them to contain signatures (MD5 or
something)
and get the whole copy from the server when needed to diff
(after all
the files [each one separately] aren't huge)
SVN does keep a copy in the .svn
On 12/12/06, George Birbilis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
parts of each file etc. However having all those copies at each client is
extra safety I suppose in case of disaster...
I find that a very useful feature as well!
Btw, I guess SVN doesn't download the files at the .svn folder, but creates
Once a file exists, SVN only get the difference on each
update, to minimize network traffic. Only the first checkout
is a complete copy of each file.
I suppose it downloads the real file, then copies to the .svn folder, not
get it twice
_
avast! Antivirus http://www.avast.com :
Which library would people suggest for this? Should I go for it, would
it be ok to use Indy or is there someother better / more stable /
supported lib for Lazarus?
Vincent asked me to comment on this so here goes:
First, you should know that as the author of LNet I'm biased towards it
but
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:00:30 +0200
George Birbilis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no singleton IDE option. Why would you want to have this ?
How will you debug lazarus with itself, in such a case ?
It is cause I use Windows Explorer (many people use that for
organizing project files)
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:41:10 +0200
George Birbilis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact it should be
Set path=%fpcmakepath%;%path%
So that the %fpcmakepath% takes precedence (the leftmost ones are
checked first), in case other MAKE are in the path from MS or Borland
or other tools
1) Can
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:20:45 +0100
Aleš Katona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which library would people suggest for this? Should I go for it,
would it be ok to use Indy or is there someother better / more
stable / supported lib for Lazarus?
Vincent asked me to comment on this so here goes:
All this is possible, but IMHO it is nonsense to put effort
into creating such a snapshot.
I think there is some intelligence test, test if people
persevere enough. If a person cannot find the link to getting
the sources from the home page and follow those instructions
to get a svn
George Birbilis schrieb:
All this is possible, but IMHO it is nonsense to put effort
into creating such a snapshot.
I think there is some intelligence test, test if people
persevere enough. If a person cannot find the link to getting
the sources from the home page and follow those
On 12/11/06, George Birbilis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't say I agree, people with experience and skills don't have the time
to spend reading all those instructions etc.
Downloading subversion Lazarus consists of typing 1 expression on the
command prompt. This expression can be copied from
On 12/11/06, Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
George Birbilis schreef:
All this is possible, but IMHO it is nonsense to put effort
into creating such a snapshot.
I think there is some intelligence test, test if people
persevere enough. If a person cannot find the link to getting
Adrian Maier wrote:
On 12/11/06, Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
George Birbilis schreef:
All this is possible, but IMHO it is nonsense to put effort
into creating such a snapshot.
I think there is some intelligence test, test if people
persevere enough. If a person
Somebody not patient enough to walk through the setup won't
fix anything anyways.
Well, I've fixed the unihighlighter (had posted the fix to the list, but
never found the time to setup and then diff etc. [was too busy - now trying
to make some time to send the diff, have installed laz, fpc, the
Regarding size, we could have a clever
autodownloader/installer that
reads a config/instructions file online from Laz site and grabs the
correct FPC archive from FPC site, unpacks it etc., same with Laz
files and places them were needed
Yes, please implement this. I cannot wait for your
But it doesn't seem to be extremely hard to build something like :
- the Lazarus tree is put on a ftp server
- inside the tree there is a file containing (for axemple) the list of
files and their md5 checksums
- when a user clicks Update Lazarus , the program downloads
the list of files
In fact it should be
Set path=%fpcmakepath%;%path%
So that the %fpcmakepath% takes precedence (the leftmost ones are checked
first), in case other MAKE are in the path from MS or Borland or other tools
1) Can you please add the following batch file to the Laz source distro?
Please name it
1) Can you please add the following batch file to the Laz
source distro?
Also, what is lazarus.exe and what startlazarus.exe? (big size difference).
Why are there two?
If it's for making a singleton process and starting the small one first,
then closing if large one is running it's not needed,
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, George Birbilis wrote:
1) Can you please add the following batch file to the Laz
source distro?
Also, what is lazarus.exe and what startlazarus.exe? (big size difference).
Why are there two?
If it's for making a singleton process and starting the small one first,
There is no singleton IDE option. Why would you want to have this ?
How will you debug lazarus with itself, in such a case ?
It is cause I use Windows Explorer (many people use that for organizing
project files) to open files in the IDE and with Lazarus I get a new IDE
running each time
The
On 12/11/06, George Birbilis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nonsense. The .svn folders contain a whole copy of the files.
??? Strange, I'd expect them to contain signatures (MD5 or something) and
get the whole copy from the server when needed to diff (after all the files
[each one separately] aren't
We have almost this. We call this snapshots:
http://www.hu.freepascal.org/lazarus/
They come with latest lazarus source + lazarus compiled +
free pascal
in either 2.0.4 or 2.1.1 versions.
The only difference from what you asked is that they cannot be
updated via subversion. You
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 12/1/06, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have almost this. We call this snapshots:
http://www.hu.freepascal.org/lazarus/
They come with latest lazarus source + lazarus compiled + free pascal
in either 2.0.4 or 2.1.1 versions.
The only
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Kris Leech wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 12/1/06, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have almost this. We call this snapshots:
http://www.hu.freepascal.org/lazarus/
They come with latest lazarus source + lazarus compiled +
On 12/8/06, Kris Leech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm considering creating a VMWare image as well. It will be
completely setup with icons on the desktop., updateable via svn,
etc... Contain the latest stable release of FPC and a 2.1.1 version.
I currently have this done with Windows 2000, but
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Kris Leech wrote:
PS. How come we can reply to the Lazarus mailing list using email, but
not the FPC mailing list... Are they on different systems?
They are.
But why wouldn't you be able to reply to the FPC mailing list using email
? I do
As well as VM a live linux CD is a pretty good idea as
well, can this
be done from the same image?
I've got no idea what is involved in creating a Live CD.
Knoppix has such I think, maybe it's easy to add/remove stuff to it
Think it's at www.knoppix.org (try also with one p)
Is there some way to get the source of lazarus from the repository together
with the free pascal compiler etc. and be able to build the IDE right after
that and run it? I mean just check-in one single thing, not read
instructions and find fpc and copy it there, then run it (or do I have the
wrong
Flávio Etrusco wrote:
On 6/30/06, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/30/06, Micha Nelissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When doing a svn export, you still have the build number. That's where
it's useful for.
And why do you need that file when doing a svn export? I didn´t
ok, I think I understand now.
But is it necessary to increase the revision when Lazarus is built?
How does that bring a correct revision? You build Lazarus after each patch?
Maybe we could have a script to update revision.inc
thanks,
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
ok, I think I understand now.
But is it necessary to increase the revision when Lazarus is built?
How does that bring a correct revision? You build Lazarus after each
patch?
Maybe we could have a script to update revision.inc
Have a look at the Makefile.fpc of the compiler. It creates a
On 6/30/06, Micha Nelissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When doing a svn export, you still have the build number. That's where
it's useful for.
And why do you need that file when doing a svn export? I didn´t understand.
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On 6/30/06, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/30/06, Micha Nelissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When doing a svn export, you still have the build number. That's where
it's useful for.
And why do you need that file when doing a svn export? I didn´t understand.
Hmm, I
(Just trying better luck with a different subject...)
On 6/22/06, Flávio Etrusco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Why is 'revision.inc' in the repository? It seems to be automatically
generated every time Lazarus is compiled, right?
Or else, why is it not always in sync (IOW it contains
Flávio Etrusco wrote:
Right now its only effect seem to be generate a svn conflict if you
compile and then update...
When doing a svn export, you still have the build number. That's where
it's useful for.
Micha
_
To
Hi,
Why is 'revision.inc' in the repository? It seems to be automatically
generated every time Lazarus is compiled, right?
Or else, why is it not always in sync (IOW it contains a different
revision than current HEAD)?
On a sidenote, can anybody running Linux suggest a better GUI for svn
better
Our german FTP machine was compromised recently (that is why the wiki
is down). The main server has also been compromised some time ago.
Since then, I am reluctant to open too much ports.
In reality, the problem is with your ISP, namely that they don't
seem to support all WebDAV
Hi,
Would whoever is running the Free Pascal / Lazarus repository consider
enabling the SVN protocol as well. Currently only the HTTP protocol is
enabled. (example: GCC has both protocols enabled at
svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/ or via http://gcc.gnu.org/svn/)
I have also heard that using the HTTP
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
Would whoever is running the Free Pascal / Lazarus repository consider
enabling the SVN protocol as well. Currently only the HTTP protocol is
enabled. (example: GCC has both protocols enabled at
svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/ or via http
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Michael,
The only SSH client I have used is Putty (for Windows) to maintain our
internal Linux server. What would such a setup involve?
I don't know, because I don't know what ssh client you use.
What is the security risk connecting via
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Michael,
The only SSH client I have used is Putty (for Windows) to maintain our
internal Linux server. What would such a setup involve?
I don't know, because I don't know what ssh client you use.
What is the
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Micha Nelissen wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Our german FTP machine was compromised recently (that is why the wiki
Let's be fair. The above is not confirmed, it may also have been a DOS
attack.
True, but the result is the same: the machine is unusable, and
a lot
What about letting apache listening to a second port ?
I got no idea what my ISP has change, and asking them was a useless
exercise! The only thing I could test on my own, was being able to
connect successfully to all attempted connection via the SVN protocol.
At this stage I am willing to
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Marc Weustink wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Michael,
The only SSH client I have used is Putty (for Windows) to maintain our
internal Linux server. What would such a setup involve?
I
Hi Michael,
I see the SmartSVN client I sometimes use, has SSH support built-in
(it says SVN+SSH for connection type), so could try that
The ssh part requires a username and password though.
Regards,
- Graeme -
On 3/3/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only SSH
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Michael,
I see the SmartSVN client I sometimes use, has SSH support built-in
(it says SVN+SSH for connection type), so could try that
The ssh part requires a username and password though.
I use putty to setup the connection. After that I configure svn so that
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Michael,
I see the SmartSVN client I sometimes use, has SSH support built-in
(it says SVN+SSH for connection type), so could try that
The ssh part requires a username and password though.
I use putty to setup the
On 3/3/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some mails on the FPC core list made clear that this option is not
feasible, because we don't allow password logins on the FPC machines.
The topic is still under consideration.
Thanks for the feedback, awaiting the final answer...
Hi Michael
That seems to have done the trick!! I just tested it from home and it
is now busy checking out the Lazarus repository, which it couldn't
before on port 80. Monday I will test it from work as well, which is
where I use it most.
So far so good. Thanks!
Regards,
- Graeme -
On 3
-Original Message-
From: Panagiotis Sidiropoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 November 2005 13:28
To: lazarus@miraclec.com
Subject: [lazarus] List repository
Is there any repository for all discussions through this list
so not to bother you for issues already answered? I
Marc Santhoff wrote:
Is there any way of searching through the list archives?
Some days ago I didn't find one, but it would really be a good thing.
http://www.mail-archive.com/lazarus@miraclec.com/
This one is searchable.
_
Am Donnerstag, den 17.11.2005, 15:13 +0300 schrieb Timothy Ha:
Marc Santhoff wrote:
Is there any way of searching through the list archives?
Some days ago I didn't find one, but it would really be a good thing.
http://www.mail-archive.com/lazarus@miraclec.com/
This one is
97 matches
Mail list logo
