On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 02:19:58PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
[1] Should I have separate trees for different underlying versions of
net-snmp? For example, I committed net-snmp v4.2.4. I am contemplating
building and committing both v4.2.5 and the totally different
distribution v5.x. So,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:01:27PM -0700, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
CVS is designed to handle directories full of information... so a
directory tree of html documents is a natural thing to enter.
An idea...
net-snmp/
README.txt
package/
salut jacques
you need:
- image from
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/leaf/Bering_1.0-rc3_img_bering_1680.bin?d
ownload
- pptpd.lrp from
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/packages/pptpd.lrp
- patched pppd from
George,
David has a proposed solution for building our releases/branches from
cvs. It's similar to the BSD ports system. Any feedback you have on
David's proposed src build solution is welcome.
http://cvs.leaf-project.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/devel/ddouthitt/base/
This looks excellent!
//
Mike Noyes wrote:
Anyone,
Will removing the following lines from enforce_naming leave the perl
script functional?
Yes, absolutely yes; provided that either all of the lines are
completely _removed_ or completely commented out.
# Verify that all files are lowercase, except Makefiles
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 08:58, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Mike Noyes wrote:
Anyone,
Will removing the following lines from enforce_naming leave the perl
script functional?
Yes, absolutely yes; provided that either all of the lines are
completely _removed_ or completely commented out.
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 08:47:58AM +0200, Etienne Charlier wrote:
0. It's quite amazing that such a great product has been developed
and integrated by a few people during part time ( when do they sleep
??? )
Yes it is a fantastic project. I only want the distribution presented in
a way that
On 17 Jul 2002 09:11:44 PDT Mike Noyes wrote:
Hmm, then what did I do wrong in rev 1.2? I used vi to dd out the lines
below, and you ended up with a broken pipe from the server last night.
I am not sure about the broken pipe, but if you need more
evidence it *should* work, see below. My
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 14:41, David Douthitt wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 10:28:00AM -0700, Mike Noyes wrote:
I think a system similar to BSD Ports or Gentoo Portage would be
great. David already has sample implementation available.
Mike Noyes wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 08:58, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Mike Noyes wrote:
Anyone,
Will removing the following lines from enforce_naming leave the perl
script functional?
Yes, absolutely yes; provided that either all of the lines are
completely _removed_ or
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 09:54, Brad Fritz wrote:
On 17 Jul 2002 09:11:44 PDT Mike Noyes wrote:
Hmm, then what did I do wrong in rev 1.2? I used vi to dd out the lines
below, and you ended up with a broken pipe from the server last night.
I am not sure about the broken pipe, but if you
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 09:58, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Mike Noyes wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 08:58, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Mike Noyes wrote:
Anyone,
Will removing the following lines from enforce_naming leave the perl
script functional?
Yes, absolutely yes;
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, George Georgalis wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 08:47:58AM +0200, Etienne Charlier wrote:
[...]
3 You seem very upset by not being able to {use | install} bering on your
system and you feel better if you can put the responsability on someone
else.
I'm using Bering
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 08:34, Mike Noyes wrote:
leaf/CVSROOT/enforce_naming rev 1.3
http://cvs.leaf-project.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/CVSROOT/
Everyone,
Our enforce_naming is now at rev 1.4, and lowercase name enforcement
should be disabled. Please let me know if you experience any problems.
Below is a little script to mount and extract an image in a way that will
allow for editing and repackaging of the lrp modules.
It uses tmp files but eventually creates (replaces) a directory called
lrp-super, which contains a directory for each lrp module and the root
filesystem per the package
On 17 Jul 2002 10:24:21 PDT Mike Noyes wrote:
Brad,
Thanks for the proof. The broken pipe may have been a coincidence, but I
thought I should check before trying this again.
Almost always better to be safe than sorry, I suppose. :)
My diff doesn't look right (diff output below). The same
Everyone,
A request for Anubis support was mentioned to me this morning. Has
anyone taken a look at it?
http://anubis.sourceforge.net/
It may allow SMTP+TLS support for internal mail clients that don't
support TLS encryption.
--
Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 10:57, Brad Fritz wrote:
I also double-checked the r1.1 to r1.2 diff[1] from last night,
and I don't see anything wrong or any changes that should have
resulted in the broken pipe error.
Brad,
Thanks for taking another look at the file. I committed the changes
again.
Le Mercredi 17 Juillet 2002 15:15, Stefan a écrit :
Hi Stefan:
Thanks for this very precise description. I'll try to look at that before the
end of the week.
Two complementary questions:
1/ Could you confirm that this setting was working OK with rc1
2/ Could you give me the command (from the
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:56:31PM -0400, George Georgalis wrote:
Below is a little script to mount and extract an image in a way that will
allow for editing and repackaging of the lrp modules.
Every script is a solution to a problem; I don't see the problem, but
anyway...
#!/bin/sh
[ -z
I've been looking at some things, and updated
syslinux and e3 (in the CVS tree) to their apparent
current versions.
I've noticed that CVS can be a major pain, especially with
renaming files, or deleting or moving directories.
Anyway, there are a few updates to the ports-style
setup that need to
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, George Georgalis wrote:
Below is a little script to mount and extract an image in a way that will
allow for editing and repackaging of the lrp modules.
This is neat. I normally extract the contents of the package I am
interested in, since I navigate the actual router
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 12:23, David Douthitt wrote:
I've been looking at some things, and updated
syslinux and e3 (in the CVS tree) to their apparent
current versions.
I've noticed that CVS can be a major pain, especially with
renaming files, or deleting or moving directories.
David,
Mike Noyes wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 12:23, David Douthitt wrote:
I've been looking at some things, and updated
syslinux and e3 (in the CVS tree) to their apparent
current versions.
I've noticed that CVS can be a major pain, especially with
renaming files, or deleting or moving
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 13:00, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Mike Noyes wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 12:23, David Douthitt wrote:
I've been looking at some things, and updated
syslinux and e3 (in the CVS tree) to their apparent
current versions.
I've noticed that CVS can be a
Jeff Newmiller wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
[ snip ]
I am starting to realize that, perhaps, I should take a directory based
approach to helices' cvs tree.
I have not settled on any particular structure. However, I am wondering
about several things:
[
Hi Mike
in case noone noticed until now..
there was a glitch in the perl script anyway, see the following test
luna perl casetest.pl MakefilefoobarDDD
All filenames must be completely lowercase except Makefiles. (/)
All filenames must be completely lowercase except Makefiles.
Everyone,
Project members should subscribe to our leaf-cvs-commits list.
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-cvs-commits
--
Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
http://leaf-project.org/
---
This
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 03:21:32PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Jeff Newmiller wrote:
CVS is designed to handle directories full of information... so a
directory tree of html documents is a natural thing to enter.
An idea...
net-snmp/
README.txt
package/
[US Conferences, that is]
Anyone going to DefCon 10 in Las Vegas, NV, Aug 2-4, or to
11th Usenix Security Symposium, Aug 5-9, in San Francisco, CA?
Just wondering... Interesting that they're so close together
in time and space :-)
---
This
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 15:12, David Douthitt wrote:
[US Conferences, that is]
Anyone going to DefCon 10 in Las Vegas, NV, Aug 2-4, or to
11th Usenix Security Symposium, Aug 5-9, in San Francisco, CA?
Just wondering... Interesting that they're so close together
in time and space :-)
David Douthitt wrote:
[ snip ]
My model has been the following:
archives/
somearchive.tar.gz
otherarchive.bz2
...
iproute2/
distinfo
Makefile
patches/
somepatchname.diff
somepatchname2.diff
...
work/
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 15:50, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
[2] Since cvs does not retain group, mode nor ownership attributes, [1]
is further complicated and requires another kludge to correct directory
and files attributes.
Michael,
This should only be an issue when exporting for public
Le Mardi 16 Juillet 2002 20:33, vous avez écrit :
Hi Vic
My UML doc is really outdated. I'll try to uptade it over the WE.
Basically you have to create your Bering LEAF fs yourself.
The procedure is as follow:
1/ creates a 2M minix file on the same dir as your linux-uml kernel
dd if=/dev/zero
On 17 Jul 2002 15:23:22 -0700
Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 15:12, David Douthitt wrote:
[US Conferences, that is]
Anyone going to DefCon 10 in Las Vegas, NV, Aug 2-4, or to
11th Usenix Security Symposium, Aug 5-9, in San Francisco, CA?
Just
35 matches
Mail list logo
