On 2002.09.17_19:27:06_+, Brad Fritz wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 06:55:56 +0700 H. D. Lee wrote:
>
> > Great. May be this will be a good reason to incorporate IP_VS into
> > Bering or Dachstein kernel.
>
> Even if it's not included, the build-from-source approach being
> discussed should ma
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 06:55:56 +0700 H. D. Lee wrote:
> Great. May be this will be a good reason to incorporate IP_VS into
> Bering or Dachstein kernel.
Even if it's not included, the build-from-source approach being
discussed should make it easy for interested parties to roll their
own kernel an
On 2002.09.17_11:54:09_+, Brad Fritz wrote:
> I cannot answer your question about whether it will be included,
> but I can say that the linux-2.4.12-ipvs-0.8.2 patch applies
> cleanly over the stock Bering rc3 patched kernel[1].
Actually I have tested applying linux-2.4.19-ipvs-1.0.6.patch.gz
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 22:28:47 +0700 H. D. Lee wrote:
> List,
>
> I am on a very early step of a project to build Linux High Availability
> with Load Balancing Clusters using LVS[0] and other tools. I will use
> LEAF Bering or Dachstein for the directors.
Sounds interesting.
> Is there any chan
List,
I am on a very early step of a project to build Linux High Availability
with Load Balancing Clusters using LVS[0] and other tools. I will use
LEAF Bering or Dachstein for the directors.
Is there any chance that future releases of Bering or Dachstein have
IP_VS support compiled in? Even bui
